What to do with Roots Hall?. The best result will come from dreaming first and then addressing the practicalities.
We don’t have pots of money, the East stand will need replacing, the South stand is too small.
So:
Anchor the pitch in the NW corner but rotate 90 degrees so the pitch runs East-West. Build a new East End stand on the car park, accessible for away supporters via the lower car park entrance
Retain the West and North bank structures. Extend the existing north bank to run the full length of the new E-W pitch. The redundant south section of the west stand can be converted to much needed rest and catering facilities. Convert the West End and North Side to high density safe standing.
Demolish the South stand and build a new South Side stand alongside the new E-W pitch. This will open up access between Shakespeare Drive and the car park
Capacity:
West End (standing) 4,000
North Side (standing) 3,500 + possible upper North tier seating (2,500)
East End (away seating) 3,000 + possible upper East tier seating (2,000)
South Side 5,500
Initial Total Capacity 16,000 with possible expansion to 20,500
This new RH will have something for everyone.
The West End will become our new kop for our ultras. The North side will be for the more mature ultra. The ground will retain its character and atmosphere.
The South stand can be two levels, separated by exec boxes. The lower level will be bread-and-butter seating only slightly more spacious than our existing East stand. The upper South side stand can be more exclusive, with spacious padded seats and prawn sandwiches.
The original RH saw less than 30% of the crowd choosing to sit. Go to an Isthmian league fixture now, where both seating and standing are still available, and that preference still applies.
The differential cost of all this is not so great. A new main stand is a given so the extra cost will be for the one third of a pitch needed for the rotation, plus the East End stand. The East End stand can be partially dug into the raised earth of the car park. It doesn’t need complex construction. The Sid Broomfield method will work, i.e., planks of wood and a cement mixer.
The Trust can be tasked with funding the extended North side. The fans managed to fund a whole new stadium in 1955 so this North bank extension must be fundable by the fans.
Either way, do you think we’re up to date on building insurance premiums?On the cost front - how much is the east stand insured for?
Yes that has been commented on before. Im sure Uncle Vic knew what he was doing!?I've just had a look at the site plan. To me it appears that a big part of the South Stand actually falls outside of the site. I'm assuming that the red line is accurate.
Makes him an even bigger #### than I thought he was. Maybe we will not be allowed to do much at all with the South Stand if we don't own much of the land it stands on.Yes that has been commented on before. Im sure Uncle Vic knew what he was doing!?
Has rotating it 180° been thought of?Feel free to carry on discussing rotating the pitch as you wish. However, please do bear in mind an industry professional has already mentioned that it’s likely not feasible either for space or cost reasons.
The cost would be immenseThere is ample room to extend the existing North Bank structure. There would be more space behind an extended North Bank than there is behind the existing North bank foot print !. I'm not talking about building a new North Bank stand.
Also, the position of the new south side pitch line would run in a line extending from the existing Shakespeare drive entrance. There is ample room behind that line to build a new South Side stand.
View attachment 29739
Looking at that plot again, no 25 could restrict moving the ground east by a distance significant enough to make improvements to the west feasible.@THE SEVENTIES NORTH BANK the RH footprint is still not wide enough to comfortably allow for a 90° shift. The land marked up as 25 Roots Hall Avenue on the site plan would need to be purchased and even then ot would be tight. I would have thought levelling the site would put the whole scheme financially prohibitive not to mention a new East Stand, a new South Stand and in reality new West and North stands as well.
The costs of what I'm proposing are made up of:THE PITCH
The cost would be immense
Like I said, the new East Stand would take up some of the car park. And then you need fans space to enter the new East Stand, taking up even more of the car park than your example shows. It just doesn't work.This would be the result. The new East End plot is based on the 2,900 capacity Oxford Utd East Stand. The depth of the new South Side stand is based on the 5,026 capacity Oxford Utd North Stand. Their stand is shorter than our pitch length so the 5,500 capacity I suggested could be achievable.
View attachment 29742
What did you think of my idea of knocking down and building a new stand about every 5 years if possible financially?Ultimately. As long as character remains, the ground becomes more self sufficient with a capacity of around 13-16k then we should be just fine in tiers 2-5.
At the moment. We have a reduced capacity of around 10k max (if that!)
The facilities are absolutely shocking and the ground is bordering on being closed for health and safety.
That all needs to change.