The Original Tribal Chief
Top G ⭐⭐🦐
The fact that the ‘system’ can be used to justify the sentencing of Edwards and of the anti-immigration protesters doesn’t make those sentences morally acceptable. It just shows that the system is broken.
The fact that the ‘system’ can be used to justify the sentencing of Edwards and of the anti-immigration protesters doesn’t make those sentences morally acceptable. It just shows that the system is broken.
A 67-year-old got 20 months for chanting "you're not English anymore" at police officers. You think that's worse than looking a pictures of child sexual abuse?
This is precisely the two-tier justice that people are protesting about.
Of course it’s not irrelevant because it’s Called an opinion which the last time I looked is still allowed .I listened a barrister explain why Edward’s received the sentence he did and it made sense. The fact that you or anyone else don't think it was severe enough is irrelevant.
Only those that are approved.Of course it’s not irrelevant because it’s Called an opinion which the last time I looked is still allowed .
Incredible that whenever a celebrity paedophile gets mentioned on here, the same people defend them in one way or another. He got caught with some of the worst images you can think of, then asked his sender for more. Some of those male children or recent teenagers being abused will carry a life sentence. As proven, many will become drug addicts or alcoholics when they are old enough to realise what was done to them, and they use drugs or/and alcohol to block it out. Some will commit suicide. My heart goes out to all victims, and not a highly privileged person that is living a sickening double life. And by the way, strings were pulled as cases like this normally go to Crown Court, not a magistrates Court.
Pleading guilty is the get (keep) out of gaol card....
But still receives his pension pot from the BBC including his recent pay rise.He has effectively a life sentence, he's not going to able to go anywhere without people recognising him and with what he's done. I would imagine he will leave the country and set up somewhere else.
I don't really give two hoots what a barrister says. I've listened to and read reports and comments from several victims of these kind of crimes and it should be relevant that the vast majority of people who care, think this is utterly disgraceful.I listened a barrister explain why Edward’s received the sentence he did and it made sense. The fact that you or anyone else don't think it was severe enough is irrelevant.
I don't really give two hoots what a barrister says. I've listened to and read reports and comments from several victims of these kind of crimes and it should be relevant that the vast majority of people who care, think this is utterly disgraceful.
There is a big difference between the desire for revenge and justice. It would be a very slippery slope to start accommodating populist rhetoric in the legal system.Then do something about it - perhaps campaign for a review of sentencing guidelines?
He will. Shame he won't be able to enjoy it. It's not as if he can go on a cruise or on holiday without people recognising him and calling him a nonce.But still receives his pension pot from the BBC including his recent pay rise.
There is a big difference between the desire for revenge and justice. It would be a very slippery slope to start accommodating populist rhetoric in the legal system.
He will. Shame he won't be able to enjoy it. It's not as if he can go on a cruise or on holiday without people recognising him and calling him a nonce.
I am certainly not an advocate for 'throwing away the key'. I volunteered in the local state prison here in Oregon and the sentencing of some of the men is just ridiculous. One of the inmates, who I'm now privileged to call my friend, had a childhood that just beggared belief. Baby P levels of abuse, but he survived. Sent out to steal and assault by a drug addicted mother. He killed a man during an attempt to rob him. He doesn't deny it, doesn't make any excuses, although he did admit to me that he doesn't even remember the event because he was on a 72 hour meth binge. He doesn't deny that he belonged in prison. But he was sentenced to life without parole - to me, that is beyond excessive. I want rehabilitation, not punishment. But most of all, I want consistency and I want fairness.The killer of my mate got sentanced at Bas Crown Court yesterday, finally pleaded guilty to death by reckless. (60-70 mph in a 30, on phone, in defective car)
After mitigation and sobbing in box etc got 30mths.
I know the widow, children, grand children, laid off employees and closed firms as a result of Garry's death aren't feeling justice has been served; but they are wise enough to acknowledge 30 years wouldn't bring him safely home.
Please don't take this the wrong way as I'm genuinely interested, but how do you square that with being pro the death penalty (as I believe you are)? How do you rehabilitate someone who is dead? Because, let's be fair, there are people who would argue your friend should have been given the death penalty.I am certainly not an advocate for 'throwing away the key'. I volunteered in the local state prison here in Oregon and the sentencing of some of the men is just ridiculous. One of the inmates, who I'm now privileged to call my friend, had a childhood that just beggared belief. Baby P levels of abuse, but he survived. Sent out to steal and assault by a drug addicted mother. He killed a man during an attempt to rob him. He doesn't deny it, doesn't make any excuses, although he did admit to me that he doesn't even remember the event because he was on a 72 hour meth binge. He doesn't deny that he belonged in prison. But he was sentenced to life without parole - to me, that is beyond excessive. I want rehabilitation, not punishment. But most of all, I want consistency and I want fairness.