• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

The fact that the ‘system’ can be used to justify the sentencing of Edwards and of the anti-immigration protesters doesn’t make those sentences morally acceptable. It just shows that the system is broken.

Maybe some of the anti-immigration protestors should have played the 'didn't get into Oxford' card?
 
I listened a barrister explain why Edward’s received the sentence he did and it made sense. The fact that you or anyone else don't think it was severe enough is irrelevant.
Of course it’s not irrelevant because it’s Called an opinion which the last time I looked is still allowed .
 
Incredible that whenever a celebrity paedophile gets mentioned on here, the same people defend them in one way or another. He got caught with some of the worst images you can think of, then asked his sender for more. Some of those male children or recent teenagers being abused will carry a life sentence. As proven, many will become drug addicts or alcoholics when they are old enough to realise what was done to them, and they use drugs or/and alcohol to block it out. Some will commit suicide. My heart goes out to all victims, and not a highly privileged person that is living a sickening double life. And by the way, strings were pulled as cases like this normally go to Crown Court, not a magistrates Court.
 
Last edited:
Incredible that whenever a celebrity paedophile gets mentioned on here, the same people defend them in one way or another. He got caught with some of the worst images you can think of, then asked his sender for more. Some of those male children or recent teenagers being abused will carry a life sentence. As proven, many will become drug addicts or alcoholics when they are old enough to realise what was done to them, and they use drugs or/and alcohol to block it out. Some will commit suicide. My heart goes out to all victims, and not a highly privileged person that is living a sickening double life. And by the way, strings were pulled as cases like this normally go to Crown Court, not a magistrates Court.

I don’t see anyone defending Huw Edwards.

I see people defending the fact that his punishment is consistent with sentencing guidelines. Guidelines that are drawn up by experts rather then the social media court of public opinion.

Similar sentences are handed down every week without public outcry.
 
I listened a barrister explain why Edward’s received the sentence he did and it made sense. The fact that you or anyone else don't think it was severe enough is irrelevant.
I don't really give two hoots what a barrister says. I've listened to and read reports and comments from several victims of these kind of crimes and it should be relevant that the vast majority of people who care, think this is utterly disgraceful.
 
I don't really give two hoots what a barrister says. I've listened to and read reports and comments from several victims of these kind of crimes and it should be relevant that the vast majority of people who care, think this is utterly disgraceful.

Then do something about it - perhaps campaign for a review of sentencing guidelines?
 
There is a big difference between the desire for revenge and justice. It would be a very slippery slope to start accommodating populist rhetoric in the legal system.

Of course - if you want revenge move to Iran or Saudi.

You are quite right about populism - no one baying for blood cared about the sentencing guidelines for these cases last week. I doubt they will next week.
 
The killer of my mate got sentanced at Bas Crown Court yesterday, finally pleaded guilty to death by reckless. (60-70 mph in a 30, on phone, in defective car)
After mitigation and sobbing in box etc got 30mths.
I know the widow, children, grand children, laid off employees and closed firms as a result of Garry's death aren't feeling justice has been served; but they are wise enough to acknowledge 30 years wouldn't bring him safely home.
 
The killer of my mate got sentanced at Bas Crown Court yesterday, finally pleaded guilty to death by reckless. (60-70 mph in a 30, on phone, in defective car)
After mitigation and sobbing in box etc got 30mths.
I know the widow, children, grand children, laid off employees and closed firms as a result of Garry's death aren't feeling justice has been served; but they are wise enough to acknowledge 30 years wouldn't bring him safely home.
I am certainly not an advocate for 'throwing away the key'. I volunteered in the local state prison here in Oregon and the sentencing of some of the men is just ridiculous. One of the inmates, who I'm now privileged to call my friend, had a childhood that just beggared belief. Baby P levels of abuse, but he survived. Sent out to steal and assault by a drug addicted mother. He killed a man during an attempt to rob him. He doesn't deny it, doesn't make any excuses, although he did admit to me that he doesn't even remember the event because he was on a 72 hour meth binge. He doesn't deny that he belonged in prison. But he was sentenced to life without parole - to me, that is beyond excessive. I want rehabilitation, not punishment. But most of all, I want consistency and I want fairness.
 
@The Original Tribal Chief , agree. Life isn:t fair and what happens to so many innocent young children is stuff of nightmares. I worked with homeless for a while and when they can talk about what happened to force them on the streets/drugs/crime etc it is not a fairy tale or easy options for too many. Given hope and help who knows what might achieved.
 
I am certainly not an advocate for 'throwing away the key'. I volunteered in the local state prison here in Oregon and the sentencing of some of the men is just ridiculous. One of the inmates, who I'm now privileged to call my friend, had a childhood that just beggared belief. Baby P levels of abuse, but he survived. Sent out to steal and assault by a drug addicted mother. He killed a man during an attempt to rob him. He doesn't deny it, doesn't make any excuses, although he did admit to me that he doesn't even remember the event because he was on a 72 hour meth binge. He doesn't deny that he belonged in prison. But he was sentenced to life without parole - to me, that is beyond excessive. I want rehabilitation, not punishment. But most of all, I want consistency and I want fairness.
Please don't take this the wrong way as I'm genuinely interested, but how do you square that with being pro the death penalty (as I believe you are)? How do you rehabilitate someone who is dead? Because, let's be fair, there are people who would argue your friend should have been given the death penalty.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top