• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Transfer News and Gossip Summer/Autumn Transfer Targets/Rumours Thread 2022

Transfer news
Status
Not open for further replies.
Forgive me but over the course of 163 pages, I have lost sight of the overall picture. (And at times my will to live ..............)


We have signed 5 I believe. We have let a good few pursue careers at other clubs.

If all the players that have been offered contracts sign, what is the net "movement"?

And there is a feeling on here that perhaps another 3 players are required.

In terms of numbers, is that contary to the strategy of having a smaller, tighter squad?



We released 16 and this is the amount they played in the League after December:

Rob Howard - 0
Abu Ogogo - 0
Josh Coulson - 0
James Dunne - 4 starts and 5 sub appearances (the longest of which was 14 minutes) - I think Harry Taylor will replace him
Harry Phillips - 0
Lewis Gard - 68 minutes - Wood (signed in February) and Coker and Benton from the youths take his minutes
Simeon Akinola - 0
Will Atkinson - 19 and 3 sub - the weak link in the side and has already been upgraded with Cav Miley
Leon Davies - 13 starts and 4 sub app - a replacement has seemingly been signed but not yet announced
John White - 1 farewell 89th minute sub appearance.
Ashley Nathaniel-George - 0 appearances
Matt Rush - 2 sub appearances totalling 50 minutes
Reiss Chandler - 0
Terrell Egbri - 0
Eren Kinali - 0
Miles Mitchell- Nelson - 0

Their loss isn’t really going to be noticed.

The loss of the loan players is more significant but the loan market hasn’t really opened yet.

Lopata played 11 matches and then Clark 5 and Gubbins 9 and a sub appearance. Lomas, Kensdale and Harry Taylor take their minutes.

Neal played 19+3

Dennis played 13+6 and we’ve basically signed his replacement in Mooney

So from the final 5 months of the season we only really need someone to play Neal’s minutes.

Of course this assumes the three believed to have signed do sign and Tom Clifford accepts his contract offer.
Scott-Morriss in for Davies
Lomas in for Lopata/Gubbins
Miley in for Atkinson
Taylor in for Dunne
Mooney in for Dennis

Assuming Clifford re-signs that leaves only Neal’s minutes to replace plus 119 minutes of assorted sub appearances.

The loss of the others will be mainly noticed by the financial director because no matter what we may think of them they haven’t been in the management team’s plans since the new year and most of them were farmed out on loan.
 
For me our squad is almost complete. I’d add 3 loans. one in defence, one in midfield and one up top. People forget we are struggling to pay the bills as it is. We don’t need an oversized squad again
That is a very sensible comment which I hope others in leadership positions at the club will follow . Good luck with your posting career - you have made a great start.
 
For me our squad is almost complete. I’d add 3 loans. one in defence, one in midfield and one up top. People forget we are struggling to pay the bills as it is. We don’t need an oversized squad again
One good thing is that we have cut down our wage bill massively, so wriggle room was expanded. Can't see the new players being on ridiculously large wages and we got rid of Brown the Dinosaur's players, if we can keep it to a minimal after 1 more permanent signing, we're on a good track.
 
For me our squad is almost complete. I’d add 3 loans. one in defence, one in midfield and one up top. People forget we are struggling to pay the bills as it is. We don’t need an oversized squad again
I don’t think we are too far away but I would definitely say the squad isn’t complete. We need possibly 3-4 more signings IMO, one more centre back, another centre midfielder, a forward and possibly one more winger. I agree with you about paying the bills etc so we can’t spend too much but at the same time we need to ensure that with the amount of players we have let go that we are well covered in every position. We are building what seems to be a very good squad, it would be a big shame to see all that hard work undone though by not having a bigger enough squad to allow for injuries, suspensions and international call ups
 
Last edited:
We need to remember that when the budget for the season was agreed Vald hadn't popped next door and caused mayhem. Which means the elecy bill amongst others will be a lot higher. I hope we don't get too many midweek home matches :Sorry:
 
That was the real big news of this week for me. The new shirt sleeve sponsor.

Doesnt get any bigger than that!
Well strictly speaking... we know an XXXL is bigger than an XXL, which in turn is bigger than an XL. So it depends on the size of the shirt as to whether it's gets any bigger? ;-)
 
Scott-Morriss in for Davies
Lomas in for Lopata/Gubbins
Miley in for Atkinson
Taylor in for Dunne
Mooney in for Dennis

Assuming Clifford re-signs that leaves only Neal’s minutes to replace plus 119 minutes of assorted sub appearances.

The loss of the others will be mainly noticed by the financial director because no matter what we may think of them they haven’t been in the management team’s plans since the new year and most of them were farmed out on loan.
Excellent information Yorkshire Blue - so, let me see if I have understood properly.

5 in, 16 released & 3 loan players returned to their clubs.

So, if we presume that the current players sign contracts & we get another 3 permanent (or loan?) players in, we (Southend United) will have trimmed the player numbers by around 8 to 11.

That sounds quite significant to me - although I fully appreciate the analysis that shows that the players released were not making a large contribution in terms of playing time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top