• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

SUFC: The Future SUFC up for sale

Our hopes and visions for the rebirth of Southend United, plus any plans published by the consortium for discussion
Status
Not open for further replies.
The thing that has always puzzled me - Southend have been promoted three times during RMs tenure. If you are only in it for a a profit then why fund several promotion winning and near promotion winning teams?





Who knows what was in his head but I doubt it involved waiting at least quarter of a century for the plan to come to fruition.
its quite clear to me what was in his head.

1. Buy club on the cheap

2. Knock down roots hall and build flats, with the money build another stadium.

Make a huge personal profit and be a local hero. Bloody good plan, shame it never worked. A massive part of him must feel like he's wasted 20 years of his life.
 
The Floodlights have been blazing away at RH for the last hour. Is it a sign of a brighter future or has someone leant on the light switch by mistake?
This would be my guess


Floodlighting
Floodlights must be provided to an average lux in accordance with the requirements in the table below.
Readings shall be on a grid of 88 markings (8 across, 11 down) evenly spaced with the outside readings taken 2.5 metres inside from the touchline. The average of all the readings is taken to be the average illumination level in lux of the floodlighting installation.
The lux values must be tested every two years in accordance with current guidelines by an approved independent contractor. Floodlights must be retested after any significant alterations. Existing certification will be accepted provided that the test was carried out within the last two years unless work has been carried out at the ground which may have affected previous readings.
It is also recommended that, at the same time as testing the lights, clubs also test the electrical supply within the ground to ensure that the system complies with current electrical standards and also request a visual inspection of the columns for signs of corrosion, fatigue and overloading.
An example of an ‘approved’ contractor is one who possesses the NICEIC (National Inspection Council for Electrical Installation Contracting) Approved Contractors Award or ISO 9000/BS 5750 (International Standards/British Standards), or who is a member of the Electrical Contractors’ Association. Alternatively, it can be a contractor deemed acceptable by the league.
The contractor must, when detailing the lux values, give confirmation in writing of the date when the illumination test equipment used was last calibrated.
GRADE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
GRADE 1
Floodlights must be provided to an average lux reading of at least 250. No single reading can be less than 100 lux and no single reading can be less than one quarter of the highest reading, to ensure an even spread of light.
When applying for a higher grading, the certificate should have been issued no more than six months prior to application.
GRADE 2
Floodlights must be provided to an average lux reading of at least 180. No single reading can be less than 100 lux and no single reading can be less than one quarter of the highest reading, to ensure an even spread of light.
When new or improved installations are being planned, the lighting procured must meet BS 12193 Class 2 and have an average lux reading of at least 200 with the capability of increasing to 250 if promoted to Step 1.
When applying for a higher grading, the certificate should have been issued no more than six months prior to application.
GRADE 3
GRADE 4
GRADE 5
Floodlights must be provided to an average lux reading of at least 120. No single reading can be less than one quarter of the highest reading, to ensure an even spread of light. When new or improved installations are being planned, the lighting procured must meet BS 12193 Class 2 and have an average lux reading of at least 200.
GRADE 6
GRADE 7
NEW BUILDS AND CONVERSIONS
Before installing new floodlights or upgrading existing floodlights, clubs are advised to consult with their Local Authority planning department. All new installations and upgrades must be LED floodlights.
GROUND-GRADING GUIDANCE AND CRITERIA 28

6
NATIONAL GROUND-GRADING CRITERIA
 
If I had a totally free choice of available ground this would make sense, either that or the Kursal
It makes no sense...sorry. Only if the flood lights could be maximum 20 feet off the ground....and no building taller than 1 storey. (including roof). Small matter of a runway a few meters away.
 
If I had a totally free choice of available ground this would make sense, either that or the Kursal
Cannot be here to the approach lighting for the runway.

Can’t be at kursaal, too small

Can’t be in car park (either how it is or perpendicular), too small.

Can’t be at Queensway, too small.

Unless we acquire some kind of green belt land, I can’t see any alternative but to redevelop roots hall to be honest
 
Cannot be here to the approach lighting for the runway.

Can’t be at kursaal, too small

Can’t be in car park (either how it is or perpendicular), too small.

Can’t be at Queensway, too small.

Unless we acquire some kind of green belt land, I can’t see any alternative but to redevelop roots hall to be honest
Repurposing some of the land by Toomey and Cherry Orchard?
 
It makes no sense...sorry. Only if the flood lights could be maximum 20 feet off the ground....and no building taller than 1 storey. (including roof). Small matter of a runway a few meters away.
Precisely.

There's a reason the streetlights on Nestuda Way are lowered. And then there's the small matter of stadium itself obstructing the approach and floodlight glare affecting the landing lights.

It's a non starter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gpd
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top