Alternatively he's come on here making a very bold and important statement and when asked to explain with examples his response is well I guess we'll find out soon enough.
I’ve made a bold statement in as much as I’ve said Ron’s lied in a statement? Seriously, Is that anything that new?
The man has lied to the fanbase for 25 years.
@ForeverBlue i agree Martin has lied for a lot of years. But I can see it from others side also, you have stated he has lied about all 5 points on the statement, but haven’t been able to elaborate on this further. I think and I obviously don’t speak for everyone, but think they are just looking for some context behind the statement that he has lied on all 5 points.
If we break them down:
£1 for shares in SEL of circa 70% - if this is a lie could you please expand on this, is the lie in relation to £1 figure or the % for sale?
Roots Hall stadium £4.5m. This was the purchase price paid 25 years ago. — I think it was actually around £3.92m 25 years ago, but then I haven’t got access to the records. Are you saying he didn’t purchase it for £4.5m? if not who much do you think he paid? If he isn’t selling this for £4.5m how much is he selling for in your opinion/info.
We could agree to spread the purchase price of Roots Hall over 3 years with no rent payable in between. -- I think the word “could” is important here, all depends on his terms so maybe not a lie, but also not likely practical as he may want say 75% upfront etc. are you able to explain why this is a lie?
am happy to sell the new training ground at cost. — What is cost, again open to interpretation. How is this a lie, as do we not have the figures for what cost is? Does it include as is now or with temp or perm structures for changing gym canteen etc.
The money to fund the Club’s debt is not required on day one. The Club assesses the cash required in the short term, including settling HMRC (releasing the embargo), to be about £1m. The balance of debts (around £1.5m) can be spread over a period of time, as we have with many of our creditors. —This bit, is hard to substantiate as there is no-one who is able know, other than Martin what the debts truly are. So could be a lie here, granted.
Would you be kind enough to elaborate why you think each point was a lie, obviously without giving sensitive info, but for example your source/group of buyers were quoted more than this figure 2 days ago, over several weeks ago etc.
Could it be that the info you have was accurate, but the goalposts have moved again on Monday and that is why you feel it is a lie as in effect the details you have are now out of date due to the fast moving nature of the situation?