Strykr
Manager
Bung all the away fans in the south with the fox ****Maybe so but that leaves huge "opportunities" (I hate that word now) for the North bank and East stand.
Bung all the away fans in the south with the fox ****Maybe so but that leaves huge "opportunities" (I hate that word now) for the North bank and East stand.
It would do, at least in the meantime. Maybe lease with a view to a future purchase?I'd compromise on a deal whereby RH is owned by the new party, and the new training ground freehold is retained by Ron and leased out to said new owner.
Yes it does and i agree. Although the new flats at the east may complain i guessMaybe so but that leaves huge "opportunities" (I hate that word now) for the North bank and East stand.
Be better with the burgers ,they probably have more Bacteria in themBung all the away fans in the south with the fox ****
I'd compromise on a deal whereby RH is owned by the new party, and the new training ground freehold is retained by Ron and leased out to said new owner.
It is doable. Just by not having the debts that have been run up under Ron, immediately saves us huge amounts of money and eases cashflow.
Bring in people that know how to run a business, stop the haemorrhaging of cash, re-develop and modernise RH to include better corporate/entertainment facilities in the East and public concessions inside/outside than we have now (Sports Bar open all week etc) and with our attendances, we have a club that can definitely reduce that £100k a month shortfall.
Will it be as modern and profitable as a new build at FF? Probably not, but it's a hell of a lot better than we have now. Will it cost millions? Yes, but a lot less millions than FF that is for sure.
Well as a start - improving match day and non match day revenue streams. Forward thinking. I'm sure many SUFC fans could help there. Decent catering/beer tents/entertainment .. a decent club shop.. get all those who drink in the Railway or the Spread till 2.50pm inside the ground spending cash there. Let's face it we're hardly enticing them in now. Local clubs further down the leagues put us to shame.
One way would be to stop paying numerous late fines, legal fees and interest on borrowings, let alone the amount that must of gone down the toilet re the plans at FF and beyond.
Oh yes and stop highering ****ing Helicopters!
These 4 posts absolutely nail it.Redeveloping RH could cost less than paying a premium for a ground that may never make it to construction. I know what I'd choose in this scenario. One stadium exists, the other doesn't.
If new owners were to own the Roots Hall site, they would have lots of freedom to pick and choose what facilities they add to the stadium.
Not to mention, it would probably take a similar amount of time to spruce RH up as it would to have an entire new stadium built.
As for the additional revenues, they will not be forthcoming in the next few years or so anyway so likely makes no difference to any buying party. They know they're inheriting a loss making venture and need to turn it around to add value to the club.
They know the club will be running at a loss until it is made sustainable by whatever means, whether that be a new ground, making our current ground better, or simply being rid of Ron's incompetence that costs us dearly.
Which is exactly why the Portsmouth model works, because it is predominantly revamping the existing structures without any significant change in scale.The main problem with redeveloping Roots Hall is you would need to start the planning permission all over again. We are currently limited to how high the South stand can go so we would probable need to rotate the pitch and that would mean a ground share for a few years and if you wanted to hold concerts/conventions when completed where will people park?
In our case, the North Stand first would be nice, to give all of us in the East somewhere to go when the East inevitably gets redone.Which is exactly why the Portsmouth model works, because it is predominantly revamping the existing structures without any significant change in scale.
The East Stand (which would be the one you want to rebuild) would be the one which requires a bit more time and effort to design and plan, but that doesn't have to be undertaken in Year One.
Thats an interesting question. And would gauge how much they want to own a football club, vs acquiring a property deal.I completely agree with this but would an investor such as Kimura be willing to undertake this, that's the issue, we only have three weeks.
We can but hope so Joshy boy.. Try to keep smiling even though we all know it is very hard to ATM.Does anyone think that there would be anything positive coming out this week? Just asking
Wouldn't the alleged presence of asbestos hinder the demolition of our stands?Which is exactly why the Portsmouth model works, because it is predominantly revamping the existing structures without any significant change in scale.
The East Stand (which would be the one you want to rebuild) would be the one which requires a bit more time and effort to design and plan, but that doesn't have to be undertaken in Year One.
Specialist companies would do that.Wouldn't the alleged presence of asbestos hinder the demolition of our stands?
It is not a stadium being built near house is it. It is a sports stadium being built with house near it. You would only buy one knowing that. No cause to complain.You'd be ok with a stadium being built next to your house and having monthly music concerts and stuff yea?
No, would just need removing by a specialist companyWouldn't the alleged presence of asbestos hinder the demolition of our stands?
Is this kind of positive?KIMURA don’t need to buy the new ground.
RM will sell it for 40% of the build costs, on a FORWARD PLANNING PURCHASE.
Which makes absolute sense to anyone buying the club!