SUFC: The Future SUFC up for sale

[damien]

it's a trap...

Can you imagine if after all this, with the amount of hatred in the martin out chants. We end with Martin in

 

[Avl1983]

One of my concerns is how the NL will retain any credibility by allowing us to start a season that there is a real chance we may not be able to finish

I don't think we'll get that far, I imagine their deadline, providing they give one will be about 2 weeks

 

[ThurrockShrimper]

Can you imagine if after all this, with the amount of hatred in the martin out chants. We end with Martin in

stuff of nightmares!

 

[Whispering Bob]

it's a trap...

How ironic, he started out as an accountant, has a degree in accountancy, yet producing a set of accounts once a year is beyond him.

 

[LennySUFC]

I don't think we'll get that far, I imagine their deadline, providing they give one will be about 2 weeks

I'd be amazed if it's that close to the season starting.

It's three weeks this Saturday until the opening games and currently our squad of 13 players are not training due to the medical staff not being paid. There may or may not be water supplied to the training facility and there's no proof we will exist in 42 days time.

There is no chance we play that opening game against Oldham and I think the NL will confirm this within the next week.

 

[Smiffy]

The party I know of are long past the necessary fit and proper owner tests @Smithy.

Yet another lie from Ron.

Thanks for clarification, Sir.

So that confirms then, three parties are potentially bidding.

1. Kimura (assuming they haven't withdrawn?)

2. The unnamed party CP mentioned this morning.

3. The unnamed party @ForeverBlue mentions.

 

[ForeverBlue]

For the avoidance of doubt. When you say "second party" is this the party you know of, or is this the party Chris Phillips mentioned on Twitter this morning?

I'm of the opinion there could be three parties in total?

The party I know of are way way past the fit and proper owner tests @Smithy

This is yet another lie from Ron Martin.

 

[Cricko]

I suppose if the NL did kick us out. ****head will be blaming them for everything.

 

[Shrimper]

Of course all this could be clarified with a simple statement

 

[hlane17]

The party I know of are way way past the fit and proper owner tests @Smithy

This is yet another lie from Ron Martin.

What level of clout do they bring to the table? On par or better than our best known offer? (Kimura)

 

[ShrimperNath]

Reading between the lines, looks like kimura bid was only bid so ron happy to negotiate for a while, kimura turn up extra £1.5m debt when doing Those words are banned and try to lower Ron's asking price, this Viger fella turns up and is prepared to meet asking price so now ron not interested in kimura and wants deal with Viger?

 

[Blue Yonder]

="Smiffy, post: 2634962, member: 1345"]
Thanks for clarification, Sir.

So that confirms then, three parties are potentially bidding.

1. Kimura (assuming they haven't withdrawn?)

2. The unnamed party CP mentioned this morning.

3. The unnamed party @ForeverBlue mentions.

Can’t 2 and 3 be the same ?

 

[Kenny]

Roll on (around) 5pm, where we can fully expect a corner flag posting on the official site, full of lies, spin, and utter deflection of blame.

 

[euroshrimper]

Of course all this could be clarified with a simple statement

You forgot a simple "truthful" statement........ not the normal bull **** club statement we normally get !

 

[BedfordShrimper]

The party I know of are way way past the fit and proper owner tests @Smithy

This is yet another lie from Ron Martin.

Why is he lying though? If the party you know of are ready to go, then why has it not gone anywhere?!

 

[ForeverBlue]

What level of clout do they bring to the table? On par or better than our best known offer? (Kimura

Better.

Worlds apart in terms of personal wealth.

 

[Boreham Blue]

The trouble is with this sorry saga, we are lucky to have ITK posters who have a track record and clearly are reliable on the footballing side of things. The 'ITKs' in these matters tend to come from nowhere, could be on a wind up and seem to be linked to a party rather than close to the process. When the stakes are so high it plays with the emotions. They also offer nothing to suggest where their credibility comes from.

 

[Che's Left Foot]

The party I know of are way way past the fit and proper owner tests @Smithy

This is yet another lie from Ron Martin.

Lying under oath in a court of law, or making a false statement after taking the oath – perjury – is an offence under the Perjury Act 1911.

Tread carefully, ronnie boy.

 

[Avl1983]

Not at all, quite the opposite. I’m very positive about the second party and the huge difference it would make to our club.

Tell us more then about their intentions, financial clout etc?

 

[Smiffy]

Can’t 2 and 3 be the same ?

Possibly, although I believe them to be separate parties.

The BBC seems to suggest 3 parties also.