Mr Browns Ghost
Youth Team
Surely the trust can just pay that no questions asked or no contract neededI would be pleasantly surprised if it was only £1.25M.
Surely the trust can just pay that no questions asked or no contract neededI would be pleasantly surprised if it was only £1.25M.
That made up 500k that Ron used to sell us ?Anyone know when the £500k + safety certificate needs to be approved and paid for?
Maybe impacted areas/stands could be closed if somehow we pay HMRC and manage to build a team of nobodies to start!
I see it nowChill out everyone, this is all just to make the first few episodes of the documentary as entertaining as possible
This should all be flushed out during DD, which is why posts on here of the price being agreed pre-completion of DD would have been premature. Until you know what the current or future financial commitments are, and financial risks, you simply would not be in a position to agree a price. Likewise the terms and conditions of a sale can affect the price, so the price might still be fluid until the end of negotiations.
My understanding, from talking to a lawyer, is that DD won't change the agreed price. It will change the warranties built into the contract.
In the email from RM, he has clearly breached the NDA where he stats the terms were agreed on June 2nd. Not that I care.
But surely if the terms are agreed, and Kimura actually want to buy the club, they just will.
Yes , but if the revised figure is below the bid of a competitor why should Ron accept this revised Kimura bid . He will want the best deal possible for himself .What is remarkable about RM's response is that he seems to be talking as if the process of DD - which RM has often cited with approval in his spell as Chairman - does not count. De-coded, RM seems to be saying a price was agreed on 2 June and that the findings of DD - even if it unearths a number of hidden debts - must be largely discounted and the costs of undeclared debts should be absorbed by the prospective buyer! If that is true, Kimura have predictably and rightly said that the original price cannot but be affected by the discoveries of DD.
This assumes that the competitor will fit Ron's mould of somebody that is happy to either not do any meaningful DD, or to wave through the issues that they encounter when they do. Ultimately, the bid of the competitor will probably also get lowered when they make the same discoveries that Kimura have perhaps made.Yes , but if the revised figure is below the bid of a competitor why should Ron accept this revised Kimura bid . He will want the best deal possible for himself .
Thing is no-one knows if anything came out of the DD process that has caused a problem. Just loads of people assuming it, but as far as I can see they don’t know. If heads of terms, including price were agreed on 2nd, there would still need to be detailed contracts drawn up and agreed? And either or both parties might be looking to get certain clauses agreed the other is pushing back on. I think the only thing we can say is surely those terms have very meaningful financial impacts (or effect e.g. control or potential liabilities going forward, particularly maybe around FF/RH) or surely it would be sorted? And if it were just lawyers doing there bit, given the chaos caused by these, delays surely they would have been locked in a room, and not allowed out, until done?What is remarkable about RM's response is that he seems to be talking as if the process of DD - which RM has often cited with approval in his spell as Chairman - does not count. De-coded, RM seems to be saying a price was agreed on 2 June and that the findings of DD - even if it unearths a number of hidden debts - must be largely discounted and the costs of undeclared debts should be absorbed by the prospective buyer! If that is true, Kimura have predictably and rightly said that the original price cannot but be affected by the discoveries of DD.
Showing your age, runwell hospital closed 13 years ago, it’s houses nowRussian Roulette !
That court hearing is going to be one not to be missed, i think some TV channel should show it live . Media going to have a field day too .
RM Your honour Kimura accepted a deal ,then tried to change it.
Kimura. Yes your honor a deal was agreed , but after the DD it was found that RM had hidden several debts amounting to a very high number not just in the 100000s ,so yes we have attempted to broker a new deal.
RM Your Honour its my club ,i own it ,a deal is a deal ,
Judge , Bailiff take this Narcissistic mentally deranged man away and have him assessed for incarceration at Runwell Hospital
Showing your age, runwell hospital closed 13 years ago, it’s houses now
That is good logical thinking and explains why the third party would really like to see the club put into administration . You are then able to avoid meaningful DD which is very expensive to do . A new company is set up which inherits SUFC assets which are minimal - player registrations only . Only a proportion of SUFC creditors will be paid off . Of course football creditors- players ,staff , other football clubs etc - must be paid back in full.. But all other creditors perhaps only 25p in the £1 would be necessary to meet league membership rules . Don't forget that the administrator only has responsibility for the club- he has no responsibility for selling a stadium which does not exist .This assumes that the competitor will fit Ron's mould of somebody that is happy to either not do any meaningful DD, or to wave through the issues that they encounter when they do. Ultimately, the bid of the competitor will probably also get lowered when they make the same discoveries that Kimura have perhaps made.