• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

SUFC: The Future SUFC up for sale

Our hopes and visions for the rebirth of Southend United, plus any plans published by the consortium for discussion
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is he so pathetic that he has to go to Court yet again, to show hid tedious self, just to prove debts he should never have allowed in the first place to ratchet up, have now been paid

Its hardly glorious is it , although maybe Ron thinks it is, although the majority of reasonable people can only think, what a plonker !
 
That’s an easy one. The protesters have hampered and slowed down any sale because they’ve put the wind up all the potential buyers.
Even he wouldn't attempt that one..................would he?
 
With the deadline just a few days away unless I have missed something I think it’s virtually impossible to have a sale before Wednesday quite simply there is no way the owners/ directors test will be completed by 23/8
What that means quite simple RM will still be a director and the majority owner come Wednesday
Let’s put it this way if there was a sale on the horizon you would think that the new owners ( they will be huge football fans honest ) will be in the directors box today and you would also thing that Ron will be hosting … sadly neither will happen
 
Let’s put it this way if there was a sale on the horizon you would think that the new owners ( they will be huge football fans honest ) will be in the directors box today and you would also thing that Ron will be hosting … sadly neither will happen
Potential new owners were at the previous home game, so it’s quite likely they will be again - but if they aren’t it shouldn’t be panic stations purely on the basis that they aren’t there today. There are other things going on in life that mean we all miss some matches whether we want to or not.

Ron won’t be there. Just like Lucy Letby refusing to attend her sentencing, Ron doesn’t have the decency (or remotest interest in the football now) to attend and face the music.
 
Potential new owners were at the previous home game, so it’s quite likely they will be again - but if they aren’t it shouldn’t be panic stations purely on the basis that they aren’t there today. There are other things going on in life that mean we all miss some matches whether we want to or not.

Ron won’t be there. Just like Lucy Letby refusing to attend her sentencing, Ron doesn’t have the decency (or remotest interest in the football now) to attend and face the music.
On a point of fact, she refused to attend the verdicts not her sentencing which hasn't taken place yet. More seriously, as badly as Martin runs the club and continues to damage its good name, to draw an analogy with the worst serial child murderer in modern times might be taking it a little bit too far
 
On a point of fact, she refused to attend the verdicts not her sentencing which hasn't taken place yet. More seriously, as badly as Martin runs the club and continues to damage its good name, to draw an analogy with the worst serial child murderer in modern times might be taking it a little bit too far
On a point of fact, she has openly stated for the record and the judge that she will not attend any further proceedings, including her sentencing on Monday - which has brought rightful criticism from victims groups, and comparisons with other murderers recently who have chosen the same.

Which is why I said it.
 
On a point of fact, she has openly stated for the record and the judge that she will not attend any further proceedings, including her sentencing on Monday - which has brought rightful criticism from victims groups, and comparisons with other murderers recently who have chosen the same.

Which is why I said it.
Not the point, she hasn't been sentenced yet. You avoid the more important issue of drawing a distasteful analogy between her and Martin.
 
Not the point, she hasn't been sentenced yet. You avoid the more important issue of drawing a distasteful analogy between her and Martin.
It requires a very flimsy grasp of the English language, or a wilful desire to misrepresent just so that you can provoke an argument (or both), to overlook the plainly obvious truth that the comparison is about having the decency to attend in person to hear the condemnation you deserve.

It self evidently has nothing to do with saying Ron’s mismanagement equates with being a mass child murderer.

It is a relevant, current comparison and you can misrepresent it if you you wish but all your barbs will, as usual, be as pointless as they are factually incorrect. Knock yourself out.
 
It requires a very flimsy grasp of the English language, or a wilful desire to misrepresent just so that you can provoke an argument (or both), to overlook the plainly obvious truth that the comparison is about having the decency to attend in person to hear the condemnation you deserve.

It self evidently has nothing to do with saying Ron’s mismanagement equates with being a mass child murderer.

It is a relevant, current comparison and you can misrepresent it if you you wish but all your barbs will, as usual, be as pointless as they are factually incorrect. Knock yourself out.
What an egregiously inappropriate response from a mod!
 
Heard from a member of staff that the "Aussies" have signed on the dotted line and will be at court weds to show their proof🤞
That would be nice if true, assuming that theoretical dotted line is to close the deal. However, if the WUP's related debts aren't cleared and their proof gets us an adjournment, we'll be slapped with a 10 point deduction.
 
Last edited:
Heard from a member of staff that the "Aussies" have signed on the dotted line and will be at court weds to show their proof🤞
Does that mean the goalposts stop moving? Hope it's a buyout rather than investment, but beggers can't be choosers.
I'll await official confirmation before getting too excited
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top