I've said it before, I will say it again....continue the season next March. In other words a 12 month break which would most likely incorporate a second wave of infections within that period.I haven't read further but presumably the shorter games idea is so they can fit games in closer proximity to each other, teams can play 3 or 4 times a week? or is it so they can play them back to back at the same venues?
I've said it before, I will say it again....continue the season next March. In other words a 12 month break which would most likely incorporate a likely second wave.
All these wonderful ideas about how to end the season before August. Are people assuming that a new season then would be uninterrupted? A second wave in late autumn/winter would screw up next season as well. We would have the same discussions then that we are having now.
12 months without football wouldn't bother me. I would rather they found an effective, fair way of completing this season (albeit one year late), than some of these half thought out ideas of average points per game, promotions but no relegations, no play-offs etc etc.
Just treat it as an enforced 12 month lay-off and come back next March to end this season.
And all these other ill thought out half-baked ideas will?You can’t come back to a season after a year away. Sorry, but it just won’t work.
And all these other ill thought out half-baked ideas will?
Without going into the issues of contracts and financing which I tried to cover in an earlier post on this thread, please elaborate rather than just say "it wouldn't work".
All I will say is that there was a BBC Have Your Say recently on the same subject, which offers both likes and dislikes to peoples' comments, and albeit from a small sample I received 19 likes and 2 dislikes to this suggestion.Blimey, where do I even start?
I will touch on contracts and financing because despite what you’ve previously said, those things alone make your solution nigh-on impossible, certainly for the lower leagues anyway.
But even leaving those things aside, come back to it after a whole year? Man, a lot of things can change in a year. I don’t think you can just pause an intensely competitive campaign and come back to it with everything the same a year later. There is a lot to be said for “momentum” and you can’t necessarily expect teams to get right back into the well-oiled rhythm after a whole year away from the environment of competitive matches. That could have a big sporting effect on those last 10 games and I don’t think that’s fair.
Pausing for a 2-3 months is one thing - a year is a whole other level. If the season can’t be completed by the end of June or July then it should be cancelled.
All I will say is that there was a BBC Have Your Say recently on the same subject, which offers both likes and dislikes to peoples' comments, and albeit from a small sample I received 19 likes and 2 dislikes to this suggestion.
I accept there would have to be a major restructuring within the game, combined with a far-reaching reallocation of money amongst the 91 league clubs and the professional non-league clubs.
However, the points about momentum and rhythm don't wash with me. It is the same for every club I.e. a level playing field. What about the 1962-63 season with virtually no games for three months due to the snow and ice? Yes, this would be longer but so what? Nobody could accuse it of being unfair to some teams and fair for others. Not like the other proposals where in each case some clubs would have a reason to feel badly done by, and the law-suits would come flying in.
Tell me one club who would have a justifiable grievance about re-starting this season next March ?
If you went by the number of retweets and likes on election day Corbyn should have won by a landslide, extrapolating the views of people that use the comment section of a website to the general population is generally a bad idea. In any case the most popular option with the public may not even be viable depending on what it is.All I will say is that there was a BBC Have Your Say recently on the same subject, which offers both likes and dislikes to peoples' comments, and albeit from a small sample I received 19 likes and 2 dislikes to this suggestion.
I accept there would have to be a major restructuring within the game, combined with a far-reaching reallocation of money amongst the 91 league clubs and the professional non-league clubs.
However, the points about momentum and rhythm don't wash with me. It is the same for every club I.e. a level playing field. What about the 1962-63 season with virtually no games for three months due to the snow and ice? Yes, this would be longer but so what? Nobody could accuse it of being unfair to some teams and fair for others. Not like the other proposals where in each case some clubs would have a reason to feel badly done by, and the law-suits would come flying in.
Tell me one club who would have a justifiable grievance about re-starting this season next March ?
I haven't read further but presumably the shorter games idea is so they can fit games in closer proximity to each other, teams can play 3 or 4 times a week? or is it so they can play them back to back at the same venues?
I've said it before, I will say it again....continue the season next March. In other words a 12 month break which would most likely incorporate a second wave of infections within that period.
All these wonderful ideas about how to end the season before August. Are people assuming that a new season then would be uninterrupted? A second wave in late autumn/winter would screw up next season as well. We would have the same discussions then that we are having now.
12 months without football wouldn't bother me. I would rather they found an effective, fair way of completing this season (albeit one year late), than some of these half thought out ideas of average points per game, promotions but no relegations, no play-offs etc etc.
Just treat it as an enforced 12 month lay-off and come back next March to end this season.
As a statistician I am well aware of this thank you, but in the absence of any other feedback I felt it was worth quoting. At least it shows 21 people had actually looked at my suggestion, whereas I get a general impression on here that a number of people post on a thread without looking back at earlier postings on the same thread.If you went by the number of retweets and likes on election day Corbyn should have won by a landslide, extrapolating the views of people that use the comment section of a website to the general population is generally a bad idea. In any case the most popular option with the public may not even be viable depending on what it is.
As a statistician I am well aware of this thank you, but in the absence of any other feedback I felt it was worth quoting. At least it shows 21 people had actually looked at my suggestion, whereas I get a general impression on here that a number of people post on a thread without looking back at earlier postings on the same thread.
A lot of sense spoken there.Player wages and contracts will bankrupt EFL clubs: it's time for the PFA to act | Mark Palios
A radical solution is needed and the PFA has the money and the power to step in and help clubs that have no income for the foreseeable futurewww.theguardian.com
A very good and detailed analysis - well worth a read