• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Migrant "children" from Calais

A bit unnecessary - I've met ***, and drunk with him and been to a match with him. Just because people have different politics doesn't mean we can't get on.
And I haven't forgotten I owe your husband a drink after we failed to find the second pub. I always intend to get my round in!


Rigsby seems unable to have a discussion or debate without lacing it with spite and insults. It seems his main reason for being on here is to make enemies.
 
As I clearly stated - if you are using dating websites to work out how old someone is then your methodology is the problem - people lie on dating websites.


When I said that if an over 18 is found to be claiming to be under 18 is easily dealt with I meant that you treat them as an over 18 - so no access to schooling and schemes that are for under 18's.


You are focussing on a tiny minuscule amount of the refugees which is exactly what the Sun and Mail want you to do. You are then taking a tiny element of one of numerous posts and thinking you have found an Achilles heal. If you find out someone is not a child then don't treat them like a child.


It turns out I am not a child either, so maybe try to stop acting like I am?

So what would you do with the people who do get caught clearly lying about their age, including the complicit 'uncles'
 
Now we are into your other tactic...Playing dumb. Why not answer the question.

Ask a revelent question tben you ****ing moron. Every single thread you get on turns into this continueous farce. You dodge more questions tban every other member on the site put together.
 
The story was on the front page. That way even the most naïve Guardian reader won't miss the truth.

Yes, I read it this morning.That's why I made my comment.(Can't get the Guardian/Observer anymore in Cebazan,except online).:raspberry:

FWIW,I think the ST is the most snobbish paper I've ever read.
 
I read that the Good old USofA has only taken 10k Syrian Refugees this past year, which is the same level which the U.K are alleged to be expected to take?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/08/30/us/syrian-refugees-in-the-united-states.html?_r=0

Do the 'math' :dim:

Oh, and looking at the NYT link it seems that George Clooney has let himself go a bit...

Mideast_Jordan_Syrian_Refugees.jpg
 
Spain have a very similar amount of Syrians as UK do.
Services are bursting at the seems because of austerity and underfunding not because there are 10,000 Syrians here.

Doesn't matter why. That's another argument altogether and for another thread perhaps, not here. What's not in dispute is the fact they are.
 
France proudly announce the camp is cleared.......except for 1,500 "children".

I beg Mrs May to help these "children" relocate to the UK:nope::nope:
 
So how did he end up in Italy after being removed from the UK back to Afganistan where he never actually returned to? Just asking as The Guardian seems a little vague on the matter.
 
Please explain to me why people like Sattar, (aged 22), shouldn't be allowed back to the UK.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...orthern-france-dunkirk-calais-camp-demolished


Propaganda story...more than likely made up.

Sattar was ejected from the UK,went to Italy and now sleeps in a ditch!,the interesting part if this tale is the ditch...25 people live in this ditch...locals have no idea about the ditch....how can 25 people live in a ditch?.....ditches are normally wet/damp/muddy yet 25 people have somehow transformed the ditch into a habital ditch....do the 25 drink ditch water and eat boiled mud.
 
So what would you do with the people who do get caught clearly lying about their age, including the complicit 'uncles'

Ask a revelent question tben you ****ing moron. Every single thread you get on turns into this continueous farce. You dodge more questions tban every other member on the site put together.



So what is not relevant about that question.....On a thread called Migrant "children" from Calais. Or am I expecting to much from an angry lorry driver.
 
The secret ditch.

How can 25 people go undetected?

25 people need to eat, drink ,sleep and use the loo,yet nobody sees them,how do they cook,surely any smoke would be seen,how did they drain the ditch,why did French helicopters with heat seeking cameras fail to spot a large crowd of people.

Storymadeupbyamedialuvvie
 
So what is not relevant about that question.....On a thread called Migrant "children" from Calais. Or am I expecting to much from an angry lorry driver.
I think his objection was more with you taking tiny parts of the debate to focus on and then surrounding your question with insults.
The post that you have now attached his post to is not the one he quoted. I can see why you would do that (to show you had a relevant question at some point in the discussion) but it misrepresents why he wrote what he wrote.

I'd suggest the thing to take from his post is that due to your style of attack - someone who supports the same team as you and mostly has the same politics as you felt the need to complain to you about your methods of discussion.
 
I think his objection was more with you taking tiny parts of the debate to focus on and then surrounding your question with insults.
The post that you have now attached his post to is not the one he quoted. I can see why you would do that (to show you had a relevant question at some point in the discussion) but it misrepresents why he wrote what he wrote.

I'd suggest the thing to take from his post is that due to your style of attack - someone who supports the same team as you and mostly has the same politics as you felt the need to complain to you about your methods of discussion.


So what do you think we should do when we find out the 'child' sitting in the classroom and placed with a foster family is not really 15 but in fact 22. As happened in Kent recently.
 
So what do you think we should do when we find out the 'child' sitting in the classroom and placed with a foster family is not really 15 but in fact 22. As happened in Kent recently.


Some people simply couldn't care,they only can see what they want to see.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top