To go a little further if I'm allowed my previous comment on this thread came from one of our players but won't say who. To go that little further Freddy was becoming a little devisive in the dressing room in the few months before we sold him aqnd if you can remember his sulks caused his form to dip towards the end. The player goes onto say with him showing signs of laziness and being a potentially bad apple if things don't go his way then Paul Sturrock won't entertain him although he did express an interest in him in january. If we bring him in again we risk another individual causing strife and divisions in the dressing room all over again which is what we don't need.It'll do more harm than good. Hence why Paul S left alone a couple of months ago. In my view can't see much has changed on this front.
Well thats Bol**cks, because nobody from this squad was here when Freddy was
Then theres a saying - never go back to the same place twice. Doesn't always apply though. But from what I hear from the horses mouths it wouldn't be a wise risk worth taking as I've commented.
Brad these plyers have contacts. Luggy will have contacts. He would have asked questions.He has done. The fact no player here has played with him is irrelevant. You can only bring in players if you've played with them?
If we did sign him on loan this week it would add at least 1,000 to Saturdays gate which would enable Ron to finance the deal!
His reported to be on £10,000.00 a week you would need more that a extra 1000 people through the gate to help finance the deal , the only other stumbling block his unfit and i belive his injured so what is the bloody point its not going to happen
Added to which Coventry want him off their books, so I'd say tey wouldn't be up for funding his return to the Essex Riviera.
His reported to be on £10,000.00 a week you would need more that a extra 1000 people through the gate to help finance the deal , the only other stumbling block his unfit and i belive his injured so what is the bloody point its not going to happen