• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Jeremy Corbyn's Labour

Would working families actually sort it though ?

The pension scenario is indeed a major problem and IMO requires an overhaul by way of means testing,many have lucrative income streams yet still are able to claim state pension.


Oh dear, yet another simplistic and unreal utterance (remember the leaflets to Africa to stop the boat traffickers naivety);
AND again, so off topic.

On Topic; JC becoming Labour leader will promote industrial/union strife to return and put the brakes onto this slow and weak economic growth in the UK.
 
You read it here first!!!! #322


NOW some labourites are worried about a split if JC wins.

To me, it appears there will be no proper and effective opposition to the tories for a few years or more.:'(
 
JC will not win the Leadership race. Sufficient votes from moderates in the party will prevent it.
 
In simple terms a lot of people are enthusiastic about JC and in reality can you name another politician of any party that people are enthusiastic about? Boris Johnson is the only one I can think of and that is based on being a 'character' rather than being any good at anything.
Enthusiasm about politics - that certainly has an appeal.
 

Would you expect him to condemn the atrocities caused by the UFF/UDA and British Army during the troubles? Asking someone to try and 'pick sides' regarding NI is stupid and futile.

I quite like that photo of Corbyn with Gerry Adams and McGuinness - it strikes me as an open-minded person who's willing to have a coffee and a chat with fellow politicians, is that a crime?

However my general concern/issue with Corbyn (which I guess is in line with the general point of that Telegraph article) is that he does seem to have a worrying soft spot for international dictators who have been complicit and guilty of awful crimes and atrocities (Gaddafi, Chavez, Putin, Castro et al).

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/james-bloodworth-left-wing-case-against-comrade-jeremy-corbyn-1513969
 
Would you expect him to condemn the atrocities caused by the UFF/UDA and British Army during the troubles? Asking someone to try and 'pick sides' regarding NI is stupid and futile.

I quite like that photo of Corbyn with Gerry Adams and McGuinness - it strikes me as an open-minded person who's willing to have a coffee and a chat with fellow politicians, is that a crime?

However my general concern/issue with Corbyn (which I guess is in line with the general point of that Telegraph article) is that he does seem to have a worrying soft spot for international dictators who have been complicit and guilty of awful crimes and atrocities (Gaddafi, Chavez, Putin, Castro et al).

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/james-bloodworth-left-wing-case-against-comrade-jeremy-corbyn-1513969

Was that the photo from last week that gave you the feeling of open mindedness or the one taken a few weeks after the Brighton Bombings?
 
Was that the photo from last week that gave you the feeling of open mindedness or the one taken a few weeks after the Brighton Bombings?

I don't have much time for Adams and McGuinness. However having conversations with them seems a sensible idea on many levels. Why is a photograph of Corbyn with them automatically a bad thing?

Also, why did you not respond to the rest of my post, which in many ways agreed with you?

The Brighton Bomb was on the day I was born so have always had an interest in knowing more about that day. I haven't seen the pic that you mention so feel free to post a link.

You don't see photos of Cameron, Miliband, Osborne, Cooper, Clegg etc with Adams because 'it's bad publicity' - which to me seems a strange way to decide whether or not to speak to someone. A major requirement of being PM is being able to discuss issues with people you don't agree with.

Corbyn is in complete contrast to the current system of modern image-based politics, which is half of his appeal.
 
Sorry Pubey but I am a bit of a lefty (in the liking of socialist ideas and betterment of the average working persons) BUT JC is a prize knob of a champagne socialist, with ideas straight from 1950 Russia and his manifesto is a 1970s joke that could have been written by a British Leyland shop steward as it would do to the UK the same as happened to that company.
 
Sorry Pubey but I am a bit of a lefty (in the liking of socialist ideas and betterment of the average working persons) BUT JC is a prize knob of a champagne socialist, with ideas straight from 1950 Russia and his manifesto is a 1970s joke that could have been written by a British Leyland shop steward as it would do to the UK the same as happened to that company.

I don't think I've ever said that I support Corbyn or all of his views.

Some of his proposed policies I like. Many I don't. I like that he's asking questions of the Labour Party and I like that he's very different to Blair, Brown and Cameron.
 
I don't think I've ever said that I support Corbyn or all of his views.

Some of his proposed policies I like. Many I don't. I like that he's asking questions of the Labour Party and I like that he's very different to Blair, Brown and Cameron.

All he will do is make Labour un-electable and unable to function as an effective opposition; in short him being elected would be a Tory dream.
 
All he will do is make Labour un-electable and unable to function as an effective opposition; in short him being elected would be a Tory dream.

Not only a Tory dream but also the preferred candidate of all those left-wingers, (both inside and outside Labour), who had largely given up hope that the party would ever again elect a genuine left-winger as its leader.

Most political commentators concluded after two consecutive G/E defeats that Labour had no real chance even in 2020.

JC at least offers hope that Labour is still a left-wing party.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top