• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

I'd have thought we need to get a couple of players out, and quickly. Kane and Granty would be my bets.
 
Would be disappointed to see Grant go. Some have said he hasn't looked interested in his last few appearances which is disappointing as he is obviously a talented player.
 
I'd like to see a loan CB come in until the end of the season, I don't see Prosser as anything more than short term cover tbh, not good enough for a promotion side.
 
I'd like to see a loan CB come in until the end of the season, I don't see Prosser as anything more than short term cover tbh, not good enough for a promotion side.

Prosser has impressed me the last couple of times I've seen him. If he's not going to get a look in then I don't see why he's worth keeping, he needs games.
 
Prosser is really cover for Barker because he is left-footed, hence why he stood in for him. Barker and Prosser together wouldn't work, IMO. He is also the alternative to Gilbert at left-back, of course, but the Daggers game demonstrated to me that he is a liability there.
 
Prosser is a player that really isnt good enough to be cover and says something when i would prefer a 36 year old journeyman assistant manager playing instead.

I think im right in saying that we had christian daily training with us . Im sure he could do a job for a few games .
 
Prosser is a player that really isnt good enough to be cover and says something when i would prefer a 36 year old journeyman assistant manager playing instead.

I think im right in saying that we had christian daily training with us . Im sure he could do a job for a few games .
Dailly was last training with Northampton. Personally, I think Prosser has done well when covering this season - certainly looks a lot more confident than last season. He's still young and getting time alongside Barker or Coughlan or even Phillips can only be of benefit in the long run. Prosser won the Trust's POTM award for August this season, started the season really well.
 
Dailly was training with Northampton a couple of weeks ago. Not sure what's happened to him since then.

If Phillips is facing a lengthy spell on the sidelines then I've no problem with Prosser filling in.

Let's not forget, we still have Bilel!
 
Do we really want to see Prosser and Gilbert in the same back four when we line up against Swindon ?

The problem is that Barker is the one massively out of form. If, as Kris says, Prosser was playing instead of Barker and Phillips was alongside, then that would be fine by me.
 
Perhaps more to the point.............will we have another option???
Clohessy, Coughlan, Prosser and Barker at LB, with Mohsni on the bench to slot in if and where necessary. I really do think it's worth the "old man" starting this one, it's one where guile may be a lot more valuable than other defensive attributes.
 
The problem is that Barker is the one massively out of form. If as Kris says, Prosser was playing instead of Barker and Phillips was alongside, then that would be fine by me.
Unless it's a bit of kidology, according to the Echo, Phillips looks dubtful for Swindon. If it is ONLY Swindon he is out for.....is that something to be relieved about?
 
Prosser is really cover for Barker because he is left-footed, hence why he stood in for him. Barker and Prosser together wouldn't work, IMO. He is also the alternative to Gilbert at left-back, of course, but the Daggers game demonstrated to me that he is a liability there.

He can head the ball which Gilbert can't.Otherwise I'd agree there's not much difference between them.They're both **** poor.We should be looking urgently for a new left back in this transfer window otherwise we might blow our chances of automatic promotion.
Is Barker still playing as badly as he did against Daggers btw?
 
Can we please get away from this idea that Prosser is '****' poor. He had a poor start, and got better, so much that he surprised quite a lot of people this season and as OBL said, won player of the month. At 23 he's got a lot of football ahead of him, and should be getting opportunities if we see him having a long term future with us.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top