Blues4LifeDan
Manager
What I would say, over those ten years, it's gone from traditional non-league, to more money driven over that time. You only have to look at how many clubs were semi-pro when Barnet and Cheltenham went up, to how many are there now. It was arguably easier to get promoted then compared to now.I think there is a danger of thinking Big budget = Guaranteed promotion. Whilst it undoubtably gives an edge, Wrexham went up in their second season of high wages. Also, in the last 10 seasons, these teams have been promoted (1st named as champions, 2nd named as Play-off winners). How many of these had huge playing budgets do we think?
Barnet - Bristol Rovers
Cheltenham - Grimsby
Lincoln - FGR
Macclesfield - Tranmere
Orient - Salford
Barrow - Harrogate
Sutton - Hartlepool
Stockport - Grimsby
Wrexham - Notts Co
Chesterfield - Bromley
It's a genuine question by the way, I don't know the answer. I would imagine several of those teams did NOT have the biggest wage budgets in the world. But I seriously have no idea.
The last 3 seasons, 4 including this one, has all been about money in regards to winning the league. Stockport, Wrexham and Chesterfield all spent a lot of money. York and FGR's are doing the same. We also have the likes of Oldham spending too. Carlisle have new owners and are already trying to spend their way out of trouble. If the get relegated, they will be another spender down here.
Spending is by no means a guarantee, but no one can say that it doesn't help. Players get sold, that's a given, but it's what you do in return. Barnet have lost Kabamba and gone and got Ndlovlu. That's what is required to challenge.