Ricky Otto
President⭐
I don't remember the governor of the Bank of England ever saying that, in fact quite the oppositeAre they the same experts who told us the country would go under if we didn’t join the euro by any chance?
I don't remember the governor of the Bank of England ever saying that, in fact quite the oppositeAre they the same experts who told us the country would go under if we didn’t join the euro by any chance?
I don't remember the governor of the Bank of England ever saying that, in fact quite the opposite
Just to keep you up to date, as PC moves on so quickly these days
You can’t call a black person coloured but you can call them a person of colour. Because that includes everyone who is not white. In one vast big mega group who struggle against white oppression.
Be warned though people I consider friends prefer the term black.As they don’t want to be lumped in one big group.
Likewise another friend prefers Sikh or Asian rather than person of colour
He broke the law, that's a simple fact.
My last sentence is not a blatant lie, just another simple fact.
I don't remember the governor of the Bank of England ever saying that, in fact quite the opposite
Prove it.Or shut up.Liar.
Bare with me, it was a while ago. Found reference to it in the Immigration thread so getting closer. I trust there will be an apolegy forthcoming when I find and point everyone in the right direction to what a fraud you really are.
Can I just ask if it's exceptable for anyone to be 'chilling out' in a uninsured car parked on the road and I assume recently driven. I mean, what makes him so special?
“The man provided officers with his details and they established that he did in fact have insurance for the vehicle"
been repeated a couple of times that he broke the law - just offering clarification, he didn't, DVLA records were wrong (I understand that they quite often are).But the DVLA record showed no insurance which is why he was stopped. All filmed on camera by the officers involved.
Don't want to get into a debate about the merits of the DVLA as tbh I don't give a damn, just want to point out George hadn't broken the law, that's all I have to say.More likely not to have been updated rather than wrong. I use them all the time, appear pretty accurate to me.
Bare with me, it was a while ago. Found reference to it in the Immigration thread so getting closer. I trust there will be an apolegy forthcoming when I find and point everyone in the right direction to what a fraud you really are.
Don't want to get into a debate about the merits of the DVLA as tbh I don't give a damn, just want to point out George hadn't broken the law, that's all I have to say.
I don't drive so DVLA don't effect me. I'm happy enough to reiterate for the forth time that George committed no crime though.Fair play, if you don’t know what you’re on about probably best not to give a damn. Just want to point out that the police stopped him because he was sitting in a car showing no insurance - which is their right and what they should be doing.
Tick,tock,the clock is ticking (just like in the Brexit negotiations).You accused me of something, which you haven't been able to substantiate.Where's my apology?
I don't drive so DVLA don't effect me. I'm happy enough to reiterate for the forth time that George committed no crime though.
If you are vouching for DVLA and they are unlikely to have incorrect information then that may lead to some people thinking on a conspiratorial level about the police pretending to have duff information and in fact targeting someone due to race and colour.
He committed no crime but the DVLA had wrong information is the more straightforward option in this case.
What's your hurry? You looking forward to being embarrassed.
Any embarrassment will be on your part. Ever heard of "netiquette? " You're supposed to reply within 24 hours.
Meanwhile here's a film clip you might enjoy.