He's all talk, but all he's going to do is delay this process even more.Here
I think there is a wrong stance. He’s had 25 years to get the third of the shares that his Dad’s estate is supposedly owed. If he was that bothered about them he’d already have done something about it. Why try and ruin things now.No judgement, no right or wrong stance from me on this, just a simple observation, would you really want to be, at this late stage, seen as being responsible for causing further delay or indeed possibly jeopardising the takeover? I thought it would be near on impossible for anyone to eclipse the in the unpopularity stakes, but that might just make him a contender!
Prick. You could have done this at any time in the last 25 years and you choose now?!?Here
Don't disagree at all! My comments were more aimed at the potential damage his actions could bring as an outcome, but if you address the cause why on earth would you wait all these years? Maybe wants a moment in the limelight then plays the "for the sake of the Club I have decided not to pursue" Maybe another one with a touch of narcissistic nature!I think there is a wrong stance. He’s had 25 years to get the third of the shares that his Dad’s estate is supposedly owed. If he was that bothered about them he’d already have done something about it. Why try and ruin things now.
Because he sees a business opportunity, get money out of Ron Martin and the consortium.I think there is a wrong stance. He’s had 25 years to get the third of the shares that his Dad’s estate is supposedly owed. If he was that bothered about them he’d already have done something about it. Why try and ruin things now.
Pretty sure the Trust have already spoken to him in connection with this in the past.
Then what is it, exactly, that he does want? Notoriety on SZ?So he wants to give his late fathers shares that Ron stole from him to the trust?
Surely the consortium will own those shares upon the takeover, so he may just need to agree that the consortium hand those shares over to the trust instead?
It seems he doesn’t want any of the money Ron owes on them?
To get one over on Ron Martin, who he intensely dislikes.Then what is it, exactly, that he does want? Notoriety on SZ?
I've spoken to him on & off over the last 9 months. It's his belief that he is entitled to 1/3rd of the shares bought by Ron from Vic Jobson as it is alleged that Ron never paid the final installment when taking ownership of the club.
With how thorough the consortium are being, I did think that they would be fully aware of any mishaps and this is a rather large mishap. I totally get his stance and understand the ill feeling towards Ron (we can all empathise) but bringing down the potential sale is not going to help his dad's legacy, especially if his intention is to donate the shares to the trust anyway. That donation suggests he wants the best for the club, hindering the sale is most definitely not helping that cause. The best thing to do, and the biggest two fingers up to Ron, is to let the sale go through and let our club flourish without him.I've spoken to him on & off over the last 9 months. It's his belief that he is entitled to 1/3rd of the shares bought by Ron from Vic Jobson as it is alleged that Ron never paid the final installment when taking ownership of the club.
He says he wants to take hold of the shares and donate them to the Trust.
I don't know what legal advice he has been given (and what paperwork he has to support his claim) but our legal team (of 1 brilliant law partner specialising in M&As) has suggested that it's unlikely to be successful in court and that he/the Jobson estate *might* be able to pursue a debt claim.
All the relevant parties in the deal are aware of the situation and seem to be carrying on regardless.
I'll add my piece on top of what @OldBlueLady @Liam AAS and @Medway Blue have said.