• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Ask him;
1. As you never tell us anything how is it so many people seem to think they know your business?

2. How do you put up with so much personal abuse especially that from people who do not even know you?

3. Why give a Q and A session when whatever you say will be disbelieved because so many think they know better?
 
Ask him;
1. As you never tell us anything how is it so many people seem to think they know your business?

2. How do you put up with so much personal abuse especially that from people who do not even know you?

3. Why give a Q and A session when whatever you say will be disbelieved because so many think they know better?

I can answer those for you.

1) Because people find things out not from Ron but other sources as the clubs commincation is terrible. Ron actually as keen to hold this Q&A.

2) Thats part and parcel of being a chairman when the club is in trouble and he isnt able to finance it. (He had plenty of plaudits, me included, during the good times).

3) Because communication is important and even if we fill in some of the blanks it will be start.

Can we please keep this thread clear for those who actually have questions.
 
I can answer those for you.

1) Because people find things out not from Ron but other sources as the clubs commincation is terrible.

2) Thats part and parcel of being a chairman when the club is in trouble and he isnt able to finance it. (He had plenty of plaudits, me included, during the good times).

3) Because communication is important and even if we fill in some of the blanks it will be start.

1) What people find out is not a complete picture

2) Some of the comments are beyond part and parcel and if similar were constantly targeted at players few would condone it.

3) Its the filling in of the blanks that causes the controversy. You and others on here wish to know/ think they know far less than they do.
 
I can answer those for you.

1) Because people find things out not from Ron but other sources as the clubs commincation is terrible. Ron actually as keen to hold this Q&A.

2) Thats part and parcel of being a chairman when the club is in trouble and he isnt able to finance it. (He had plenty of plaudits, me included, during the good times).

3) Because communication is important and even if we fill in some of the blanks it will be start.

Can we please keep this thread clear for those who actually have questions.
The final line of your response sounds a little patronising, I thought they were all good questions as it goes, especially the last one.
 
The final line of your response sounds a little patronising, I thought they were all good questions as it goes, especially the last one.

You really think asking Ron at a Q&A why he bothers having a Q&A because we all know better is a good question to ask ?
 
1) What people find out is not a complete picture

2) Some of the comments are beyond part and parcel and if similar were constantly targeted at players few would condone it.

3) Its the filling in of the blanks that causes the controversy. You and others on here wish to know/ think they know far less than they do.

Thats why we are having a Q&A! :omg::omg:
 
Check back on this thread and see how many questions you would not ask are on here. whats so wrong with mine?

Ok, lets assume we aske ron why he bothers having a Q&A when we all know better.

What answer will he give that will benefit anyone at all?

The point of this Q&A is to try to clarify issues at the club. We have 30-45 minutes to ask as many questions as we can about the state of the club and its finances and future. We will certainly not have time to ask all questions raised.
 
If we only have 30-45 minutes, then I'd probably say that questions relating to future ownership/revenue of FF aren't particularly pertinent. Although they've become increasingly sparse over the last two years in particular, the likelihood is we'll have another opportunity to press RM on those issues if/before the project is completed.

Questions need to be limited to our immediate future. What loss are we currently running at per month, what's the break-even attendance, how does RM intend for us to meet our liabilities on a month-to-month basis, what is the current involvement of Sainsbury's in the running of the club, how are negotiations going with the Pizza Man and/or contractors. Basically, information relating to how RM intends to keep the club limping along until such a time that we can move into FF.
 
Ok, lets assume we aske ron why he bothers having a Q&A when we all know better.

What answer will he give that will benefit anyone at all?

The point of this Q&A is to try to clarify issues at the club. We have 30-45 minutes to ask as many questions as we can about the state of the club and its finances and future. We will certainly not have time to ask all questions raised.

My questions were posed in order to underline the futility of this exercise in the absence of objectivity. Compile your list of questions, post the answers and I look forward to reading the usual 'RM is a liar' responses.
 
If he starts the show off with some "good news" (and he must have a little morsel of some sort, if he's keen on the meeting) about the FF start date, you could go for the old favourite:

Assuming, and here we require a great leap of faith, the stadium gets build, how will the Football Club (as opposed to a myriad of other various, currently penniless, companies) benefit financially from it ?
 
Is he expecting us to be promoted this season, as in is his finincial planning including higher revenue next season?

If the answer is yes, I would suggest he amends this projection.
 
Just the one(ish) suggested question from me

How long, based on our currect projected cashflows can the club survive without receiving financial investment from an external source? And if no external source is available does RM have funds in any of his businesses to cover the projected deficit and for how long?
 
Exactly how much have Sainsburys bailed us out with to date?
How has this money been spent?
Should we fail to pay HMRC again will they help again, as I recall at the last court appearance, the registar said should we appear before the court again we should be wound up-end of story.
 
My questions were posed in order to underline the futility of this exercise in the absence of objectivity. Compile your list of questions, post the answers and I look forward to reading the usual 'RM is a liar' responses.

You reap what you sow. Just about everything that RM has said, has turned out not to be true. Has it been prevarication, equivocation or downright lies ? Or even, being charitable, errors of judgement ? As that nice Mr Adams used to say, in his quaint Northern accent, you pays your money and takes your choice. My personal choice is that I would find it hard to believe anything he says. Not completely impossible .... just very hard.
 
Indeed, he isnt going to trip up Hollywood courtroom drama style.

There are questions that need asking though and we may or may not be somewhat wise afterwards. Who knows...



Bear in mind we have 30 minutes at most. Do we really want to start getting bogged down in the details ?

May give an insight in to where unnecessary expenses can be saved
 
You reap what you sow. Just about everything that RM has said, has turned out not to be true. Has it been prevarication, equivocation or downright lies ? Or even, being charitable, errors of judgement ? As that nice Mr Adams used to say, in his quaint Northern accent, you pays your money and takes your choice. My personal choice is that I would find it hard to believe anything he says. Not completely impossible .... just very hard.

Well Mick, that was a rounded and reasonable stance but it also supports what I said. The Q and A is pointless and its time to see actions and not hear words.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top