Indeed. That is why when people wanted Ron out now it was endlessly pointed out that the optimum time to sell was when the stadium was built. That remains the obvious course except he no longer believes he can/wants to fund the club until that point. So we are getting our wish. So yes it is messy. Not helped if you then believe either, or both, of two fictions: 1. RH was ever available for sale. It wasn't. Ever. 2. Ron has no money to deliver FF or RH as no-one would ever lend to him- such statements always somehow ignore the fact the joint developers are the billionaire Dellals.Imagine being a prospective buyer of a football club, whereby you can't buy the stadium it plays in, and there's no cast iron guarantees the forever promised new stadium will ever be built. Why would you? In an ideal world RM would have built the stadium (or at least enough of it for the club to play in it) so the buyers have something tangible to buy. Its going to take some serious negotiating to get around this hurdle.
Very true....... on the face of it the football club itself doesn't look attractive investment but saying that clubs have been bought in the past with their assets leased back to the club/new owners...... This situation isn't new. The thing which concerns me is the new stadium looks miles away from construction. Given Ron inept failure in getting FF to stage where construction is atleast started, I would imagine any potential new owners would be quite wary of that. They may even get cold feet and pull out all together. Our situation does look messy! The attractive part of Southend united is the size of its catchment area and location which will tempt potential buyers to take a punt....... everything else looks **** from buyers point of view.Imagine being a prospective buyer of a football club, whereby you can't buy the stadium it plays in, and there's no cast iron guarantees the forever promised new stadium will ever be built. Why would you? In an ideal world RM would have built the stadium (or at least enough of it for the club to play in it) so the buyers have something tangible to buy. Its going to take some serious negotiating to get around this hurdle.
I was thinking along those lines. The club owner agrees to pay for the upkeep of RH to keep it useable in the short term, but no rent as such. Then RM has to pull his finger out to get the new stadium built asap.Just thinking out loud more than anything, a potential solution to the RH challenge could be that any rent and/or upkeep paid to keep the doors open are subtracted from the final amount paid for FF when the time comes. This gives an incentive to get the building completed quickly for a bigger payment when the club moves in.
Something like that would be ideal.I was thinking along those lines. The club owner agrees to pay for the upkeep of RH to keep it useable in the short term, but no rent as such. Then RM has to pull his finger out to get the new stadium built asap.
I no nothing of financial situation ron martin is in but i ask this. If everyone walked away from any deals with rm and the club folded could he still sell roots hall for housing.
The Dellals have nothing to do with the club. Neither are any Dellals directors of the club. The involvement they may have is to do with the residential/stadium development at FF and RH via their companies Allied and Citizen Housing of which they are directors.People mention the Dellals ( sorry if i spelt it wrong ) and them being Billionaires ,also is a director of the club,, May i ask what is their stake in all of this as so many times they have been mentioned ,but ive never heard a word from them. Just asking, not trying to open a can of worms.
ls
Geography, time scale, costs, league approval, viability, logisticsif the new owners don’t purchase Roots Hall but buy FF, training pitches etc…. If Ron wants too much to play at Roots Hall, what’s stopping the new owners deciding we’ll ground share until FF is built?
Would that mean the covenant is now void?
As others have said, if the buyer and seller can agree on a price, of all the terms up for discussion, a lock in on rent for the interim period would not only be just about the easiest one to achieve, but also the most likely to come with an enabling (or reasonable) price tag. All relevant to the discussion, but barely worth a moment’s concern IMHO. This is the easy stuff.if the new owners don’t purchase Roots Hall but buy FF, training pitches etc…. If Ron wants too much to play at Roots Hall, what’s stopping the new owners deciding we’ll ground share until FF is built?
No mate, most of that stuff is under an NDA, aside from the fact that it appears the deal would include at least the new stadium and new training ground if successful.I assume you don't know the terms of any offer MB?
From my POV the guys linked with this purchase are no mugs. While they might not buy RH, surely the terms of any lease to be discussed would be repairing/ renewal but at a peppercorn rent?
I can't see anything being finalised this week. Possibly not even next week. There's a chance that we will hear this week whether or not RM has accepted the Kimura-led group's offer which would be good, but all accepting the bid would mean in reality is that a period of exclusivity for that party to complete their DD and finalise the deal will begin.So no updates at this point.
I was hoping to hear rumblings of a deal being finalised in the coming days or weeks.