A fluke maybe, but one that won the game.Just watched their goal
What a fluke
Hahahaha
He hasn't though has he. No criticism of tactics etc, or "I know, we're struggling to score, so let's take off a forward and put a midfielder on - that'll help!"One of Chris Phillips specials where he openly tells it as it is and puts his finger right on the pilse
He would probably be embargoed by Maher if he actually challenged some of the tactics or raised other important issues.He hasn't though has he. No criticism of tactics etc, or "I know, we're struggling to score, so let's take off a forward and put a midfielder on - that'll help!"
Dread to think what his plan will be this week….goalkeeping coach between the sticks, Cav Miley, playing on sticks, Husin back in going backwards, Gubbins cutting up the oranges, anything is now possible with this incompetent so called head coach?Maher will probably drop him from the squad and revert back to 5-3-2, with Waldron and Kendall/Walker on the bench
That's expected. The fans pay their money and can say what they like at the games. If they have any sense they won't read the message boards (I believe they are told not to). Anyway, the fans don't pick the team.Can they not read or hear the reaction they get from the same people voicing on here abd who watch them then berate them thus knocking their confidence more? Very public to me.
To be fair, I don't know where they get the stats from... in the write up they describe 8 shots on goal and that's not counting the ones not referred to (although there weren't many).Shots on target… 3 - that’s one for every league higher than them we were![]()
As it happens it did. We looked even better when Waldron and Bonne replaced Walker and Hopper. At the end of the day we had enough chances to have won several games. 3-4-3 should only be used when all else has failed. I hope that the lad from Slough lives up to what is expected. Then you have the forward thinking midfield player we need and add Coker to that. Morton or Miley to play just in front of the central defenders, 2 wing backs , plus 2 mobile forwards. Problem solved. If only it was that easy !!He hasn't though has he. No criticism of tactics etc, or "I know, we're struggling to score, so let's take off a forward and put a midfielder on - that'll help!"
Exactly.As it happens it did. We looked even better when Waldron and Bonne replaced Walker and Hopper. At the end of the day we had enough chances to have won several games. 3-4-3 should only be used when all else has failed. I hope that the lad from Slough lives up to what is expected. Then you have the forward thinking midfield player we need and add Coker to that. Morton or Miley to play just in front of the central defenders, 2 wing backs , plus 2 mobile forwards. Problem solved. If only it was that easy !!
I've seen it several times and I still can't work out wtfh Macauley Bonne was trying to doJust watched their goal
What a fluke
Hahahaha
I doesn’t seem to make any difference in this cup if we draw a top National League team or a team several steps down we get nowhereSittingbourne got Aldershot at home in the quarter final draw. *Sigh*
We played the same system yes siree, but with the old mentality like some weird hybrid animal that has no functional use , ie scoring goals and beating the opposition, all heil the double bus low block and the just one more slow square pass will do it all football a recipe for 0-0 usually, or a breakaway setpiece goal for the opposition. Yes let's see how they react in the next few games , do the players believe in their coaches methods and in each other as professional footballers for that matter.Firstly, well done to Sittingbourne. It was a fantastic achievement for them and a huge moment in their history. We just unfortunately had to be part of it.
I know the instinct is to go for the manager and I get that, however, the team selected on Saturday should have been more than enough to beat them. We played the same system that created so many chances against Fylde and Dagenham. We started with 3 strikers and played two midfielders that like to play forwards. That is more than enough to get the win. It wasn't the formation but the application of the team. We didn't press like we had been an were so static.
I've said this so many times, but Kensdale and now Golding, are so integral to our attacking play. We selected Goodliffe who doesn't bring the ball out. Therefore, one of Taylor or Gubbins had to do that, and they didn't. If we are playing with a 3 against a side who sit in, one of those has to join attacks. Gubbins looked so scared to do that. I don't know if we will see him play much again.
Kendall had an awful game. His touch was absolutely horrendous. I do fear that he will be a player that seems like he can't be dropped because of his work rate but in actuality, he has little attacking output.
Bonne will be criticised, but I actually thought Walker and Kendall looked lost without him. Of course, he made a mistake, but why have we let it get to the 95 minute where we need our striker to kick it into row z?! That situation should never have happend as we should have been in a comfortable position by that point. He can be blamed for the mistake but he can't be blamed for the dire performance of the team before that moment.
It was an unbelievably weird performance when you consider the form we have been in but all they can do is react on Saturday. I'm hugely disappointed and I'm still really feeling it today to be honest. They have to react against Maidenhead. If we do that, fans will start thinking about the league again.
Almost as if our "on paper" formation isn't as important as some on here would have you believe.We played the same system yes siree, but with the old mentality like some weird hybrid animal that has no functional use , ie scoring goals and beating the opposition, all heil the double bus low block and the just one more slow square pass will do it all football a recipe for 0-0 usually, or a breakaway setpiece goal for the opposition. Yes let's see how they react in the next few games , do the players believe in their coaches methods and in each other as professional footballers for that matter.
Exactly. Against Dagenham and Fylde our back three were Taylor, Golding and Ralph. Golding has the confidence and ability to make forward runs when there's space in front of him. Ralph has even been known to make the odd foray into the opposition penalty area playing in that position. Against Sittingbourne we had Taylor, Goodliffe and Gubbins, all of whom seemed wary of getting a nosebleed if they crossed the halfway line. Same formation, different players, different outcome.Almost as if our "on paper" formation isn't as important as some on here would have you believe.