Napster
No ⭐
If not there’s a few fans at Ron’s houseI’m travelling down from Lincolnshire so would be nice to know if it’s definitely on
If not there’s a few fans at Ron’s houseI’m travelling down from Lincolnshire so would be nice to know if it’s definitely on
I am pretty sure it's a legal issue. If they are not contracted, in order to play as a trialist the club would need insurance cover or at the least a waiver. Players won't sign a waiver in case of a career threatening injury and the club can't put insurance in place if there isn't any, due to embargo restrictions of not being allowed to register them. @BoyWonder2 - would this be accurate?One poroblem is the utterly rediculous league rules about trialists. It is absurd if we can't play them. It would be more evidence of the contempt the league have for player welfare.
Normally first friendly no-one would play for more than 45 minutes. With the current squad size thats impossible unless management put on their boots on or we can make up the numbers with the kids?
PS Stan still looks fit enough for 45 mins!!
A trialist is never registered? And may not have a current club either, but if the do then they have that cover. Can't believe insurance is a problem? But yes BW may be able to advise otherwise.It's almost certainly due to insurance
It is alleged they were told yesterday it would go ahead but no doubt we will have news laterFYI - the players haven't been informed as yet if the game is on or not.
I just spoke to one. They are in the dark still.It is alleged they were told yesterday it would go ahead but no doubt we will have news later
I believe it was Bridge and Sandat that got offered the contracts to make up the 16. Also heard that Lomas has a slight injury, nothing serious but without any medical/physio staff obvs he isnt getting the treatment he needsWe have 14 contracted players, we may assume that Bridge and Ralph have signed some sort of contract that allows our squad size of 16 under the embargo.
Now this may need clarification form others on the board as I don't know, in terms of scholarships, what are the status of Crowhurst and Sandat. I know they both played last season but I'm not sure if they played under professional contracts, if not and they are still scholarship age can they play in the friendly. IIRC there are some kind of rules on how many games you've played professionally (5?) to be added into a squad under an embargo.
If they are allowed then that's 18. Ndi can play the whole game in goal so we now need just 3 more which could be made up of youth players.
Then out of them 14 contracted players, it depends if Lomas or Mooney turn up
The only other way of doing it is players play 60 mins instead of 45
BTW what have you got JD down as? Suspect he will be there..We have 14 contracted players, we may assume that Bridge and Ralph have signed some sort of contract that allows our squad size of 16 under the embargo.
Now this may need clarification form others on the board as I don't know, in terms of scholarships, what are the status of Crowhurst and Sandat. I know they both played last season but I'm not sure if they played under professional contracts, if not and they are still scholarship age can they play in the friendly. IIRC there are some kind of rules on how many games you've played professionally (5?) to be added into a squad under an embargo.
If they are allowed then that's 18. Ndi can play the whole game in goal so we now need just 3 more which could be made up of youth players.
Then out of them 14 contracted players, it depends if Lomas or Mooney turn up
The only other way of doing it is players play 60 mins instead of 45
GK, RWB, CB, CM, CF, coach driver, physio, medic, kit man ...... he'll be thereBTW what have you got JD down as? Suspect he will be there..
JD is out of contract so not included in the 14 and may well not be allowed to play, however I'm sure he will be present in either a coaching capacity or just watching.BTW what have you got JD down as? Suspect he will be there..