Bielzibubz
President
More people moving from one place to another makes the odds of their being a terrorist in their number more likely, and a doctor being in their number more likely, and a 20 goal a year centre forward, and a scientist, and a pick pocket, and a road sweeper, and a stripper, and a magician, and a guy that is double jointed in an amusing way, and a teacher and a nurse and and and and
Any large collection of people will include the good the bad and the ugly.
Mass migration isnt the problem, if they wanted to support isil they would have embraced them as they burnt their towns and villages, without the need to make a thousand mile perilous journey , just to blow themselves up.
The root cause of radicalisation in Europe which needs to be addressed is why are these people being radicalised. Thier families have travelled to Europe to get to a safe haven away from a western socety hating regime, only to find that upon arrival, they are mistrusted, abused, insulted and marginalised, just like they were told by the regime they were escaping. The fair treatment Governments give these refugees is being entirely undermined by the day to day reaction they get from the , so called normal, people of their adopted homeland.
They become disenfranchised and seek solace in their only comfort, their religion, which in some cases has been undermined by the regimes they left behind , and the radicalisation process begins.
Treat people like human beings and they will react accordingly, abuse them, or treat them as inferiors and a small percentage will kick back.
***, we're not talking about a doctor, scientist or footballer here. We're talking about a terrorist willing to blow himself up together with countless innocents and one willing to go on a rampage with a semi automatic weapon. I don't doubt for one second that for every member of ISIS that has migrated to Europe with the other many thousands there are going to be many doctors, nurses and scientists among them. What difference does that make? That doesn't alter the fact that the open European border policy adopted by many countries in the wake of those fleeing Syria and other places has had a direct impact on the loss of lives in Paris. That's a fact you just cannot justify on any level.
Firestorm. I care not for the why's, if's, but's and maybes as to why they became radicalized in the first place. They are and they're here. That's it. It's got fek all to do with families being marginalized or disfranchised. The one identified as one of the Paris terrorists has been identified as coming from Syria and through Greece with the specific intention of carrying out the atrocities attributed to him.
I asked this earlier and no one has answered so I'll ask again. is the open migration policy still a valid way forward now we know that at least one ISIS terrorist came via this route and went on to kill innocent Parisiennes. No doubt there are more waiting in the wings that came via the same route.
IS THE MIGRATION POLICY ADOPTED BY THE WEST STILL THE WAY FORWARD AND WAS IT A WISE MOVE IN THE FIRST PLACE CONSIDERING THE WARNING SIGNS WERE THERE FOR ALL TO SEE?
Simple question.