He did have tough hand! If I'm honest I never rated the guy but you can't say he didn't have tough hand though..... transfer embargo and 2 strikers sold without being replaced isn't ideal start to his time at Southend. Klopp and pep wouldn't done much better with that hand molesley had.Told you all when he was here he is a **** manager and people trying to justify him having a tough hand is just wrong. Didn’t he bring something stupid like 20 players. He is a clueless PE teacher. Just like almost all of the games he was manager for us his football was absolutely shocking and after going to aldershot away game this season it shows his negative style of football and his absolute cluelessness.
Is he though lol?Still a better manager than Phil Brown...
Doesn’t matter how many strikers we had - our top scorer was a defender that season and we played so negatively the strikers wouldn’t have done much anyway. Look at the aldershot strikers against us I thought they looked like pacy players who under the right manager and style of football would be decent but it was just hoof ball and they couldn’t do anything. I understand why people thought he had a bad hand but he is a very very poor manager so he needs to shoulder a good deal of the responsibility too.He did have tough hand! If I'm honest I never rated the guy but you can't say he didn't have tough hand though..... transfer embargo and 2 strikers sold without being replaced isn't ideal start to his time at Southend. Klopp and pep wouldn't done much better with that hand molesley had.
Phil bought in Arnold, Bridge and Dalby, so made some good signings at least. The only player MM brought in who’s still a regular is Hobson. Molesley was undoubtedly hampered by embargoes but when he had the chance his signings were poor.Still a better manager than Phil Brown...
And his man management style that isnt up to date. The whole constantly punish and shame ethos just doesnt work anymore.And Atkinson. Think brown actually made some decent signings it was also his negative style of play that was his downfall.
Bridge and Dalby were mostly thanks to Ricky Duncan. Phil Brown has no decent contacts left, either managers or agents.Phil bought in Arnold, Bridge and Dalby, so made some good signings at least. The only player MM brought in who’s still a regular is Hobson. Molesley was undoubtedly hampered by embargoes but when he had the chance his signings were poor.
Maher’s signings so far have been head and shoulders above both the aforementioned by the way.
To be fair, Maher has spent significant money on the likes of Cardwell, Husin and Powell. These are great signings, but MM never had that sort of backing from the Chairman.Phil bought in Arnold, Bridge and Dalby, so made some good signings at least. The only player MM brought in who’s still a regular is Hobson. Molesley was undoubtedly hampered by embargoes but when he had the chance his signings were poor.
Maher’s signings so far have been head and shoulders above both the aforementioned by the way.
Kind of does though, it's where your main sauce of goals comes from (unless your man city) if we had dalby and murphy in last season side I'm sure we would of stayed up. I wasn't fan of molesley but he did have bad hand! Going into new managerial job, with transfer embargo and 2 of your main strikers sold. It took till December for hart and akinola to be registered to play. Know doubt ron sold molesley pack of lies before he took the job. Many managers wouldn't done much better with that hand.Doesn’t matter how many strikers we had - our top scorer was a defender that season and we played so negatively the strikers wouldn’t have done much anyway. Look at the aldershot strikers against us I thought they looked like pacy players who under the right manager and style of football would be decent but it was just hoof ball and they couldn’t do anything. I understand why people thought he had a bad hand but he is a very very poor manager so he needs to shoulder a good deal of the responsibility too.
That was 1 frustrating watch....... I also remember that loan keeper molesley brought in taking his time on goal kicks when we need 3 points. All very frustrating. 1 thing I will never understand is in January that year, molesley decided for whatever reason to change the formation....we was doing ok 4231 formation but molesley went with 532 and it backfired big time with 3 straight loses, with the worse defeat coming at port vale.Molesley did have a bad hand, and no manager would have done much better until the embargo was lifted. But he didnt help himself either with his terrible formations and decisions. The breaking point for me was oldham away, we were dominating and on the attack and for no reason took a striker off and replaced him with a midfield player. It totally killed any impetus we had and we walked away with a draw.
Yes and it’s not even close.Is he though lol?
You should caveat that with PB being at the end of his career and having lost the plot a bit.Yes and it’s not even close.
It’s why Molesley has a job and Brown doesn’t.
Molesley inherited the worst side in Southend history. Under Bond and then Campbell we’d won 4 out of 35 matches and been relegated. We’d conceded 85 goals in 35 games. What little talent there was was then sold off, first in the January window under Sol (no replacements allowed) and then under Molesley, who was only appointed what should have been 2 weeks into pre-season was then allowed to sign just two players - a 20 year old who had never played a league game but has since been an ever present under Maher and a loanee winger, who having beaten his man once too often was then cynically injured and never played for us again.
Unsurprisingly we lost our first game 4-0, a result that bookended Brown’s spell as well. But whilst Molesley lost his first game 4-0 to a team who was up for it and from there on we showed steady progress for Brown it was the opposite and we got more and more disorganised ending in a 4-0 humiliation to a team who didn’t get out of second gear.
Molesley was far from perfect - understandably from a rookie in his first full-time job - but under him we improved. He showed he could coach and organise what had been a rabble, to make a team that had conceded 85 goals in 35 games keep clean sheets. Under Brown we just went backwards. Whilst the embarrassing performances under Molesley were at the start, with Brown they were at the end (although nothing compares to that shambles v Col Ewe) with games like Chesterfield, Solihull, and against a winless Aldershot where we were gifted a lead but still managed to throw it away against a truly woeful side, who sacked their manager soon after.
He benefits from the lowest bar of all-time but Molesley was better than the 2 managers who preceded him and the manager who succeeded him. Thankfully Maher outshines them all.
I think you might be surprised at how little money was used to sign those players. But yes MM was shafted in that department for sure.To be fair, Maher has spent significant money on the likes of Cardwell, Husin and Powell. These are great signings, but MM never had that sort of backing from the Chairman.
Mods can’t e lose this thread ?????If hes a samba football manager trapped by clubs who wont give him the proper resources then he needs to go back to non league and find a chairman that will let him prove his ethos, at the moment hes doing his career no favours by playing boring football.