Of course the older Brits who are retiring abroad cost nothing to overseas Medical services.. it is the same. We are no angels here.
http://www.economist.com/news/brita...-and-exports-creaky-old-ones-balance-ailments
Lookie a Linky^^^
The establishment have run the country for a billion year's,the establishment give our money away,the establishment never undertake any real work,the establishment invent silly laws to grab even more tax from us.
What have they ever done for us in real terms ?
The aqueduct?
The roads?
So you are guessing now...earlier it was a conclusion.
I have already concluded that 2 billion a year according to government stats is spent on health tourism....like Farage I would rather that money be spent on British patients.
If people want to spend money on treating overseas visitors that's fine, do it via charities.
As for the 4200 that are here from abroad, he doesn't want to treat them from NHS funds....according to your party the conservatives are killing the NHS....it cant be that bad if we can afford 2 billion can it?[/QUOTE
not at all, the first time I mentioned it I asked what the conclusion was to his stats and I kept asking and no one seems to have the answer. So his assertion that people won't like what he is about to say is correct because it was all blame and no solution. Maybe everyone else is actually better at saying what they think and he has the guts to point out problems but not the guts to state his solution. My first mention of it repeated below, I stated the two possible solutions I felt he was implying and asked for clarity. Posed as a question all the way through.
What was he suggesting for foreigners with HIV? Repatriation or left to die? Seemed to be one or the other.
But ***, buying your public sector cord trousers from charity shops, and some supplementary Guardian reading from a tramp, is hardly donating to charity. I don't have the stats, in fact no-one would have, but I'd be pretty sure that those on the right donate far more than those on the left - and don't expect anything in return (particularly not ****** trousers that some other scab has worn).
Isn't that up to those countries to clamp down on the abuse of their health systems? And something else you fail to notice(since you seem to be in a wind-up sort of mood tonight) is those Brits are spread out over several European countries, not concentrated in just one.
Nonsense. I was faced with a rather large A & E bill when I got into an accident in Greece a few years ago[/of B]. My retired Mum moved to France a few years ago and they also receive nothing of the kind.
Not since early 90's darling. The clue is in the name - net migration... http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/latest-immigration-statisticsI think you'll find that Brits abroad in other EU countries especially in Spain and France are roughly equivalent to the number of EU nationals living in the UK.
Another Surrey Shrimper;1722450 not at all said:For the 3rd time of answering he doesn't want their their treatment paid out of the NHS....I don't see why this so difficult for you to get.
So how about this scenario?......They pay for their treatment...no repatriation , not left to die.
And you think the kind of sums that treatment for major illnesses cost are readily available to most people?For the 3rd time of answering he doesn't want their their treatment paid out of the NHS....I don't see why this so difficult for you to get.
So how about this scenario?......They pay for their treatment...no repatriation , not left to die.
I suggest you take the precaution getting a (free) European Health Card before your next trip to another European country.That way you won't have to pay anything for emergeny health treatment.As has been my own case with recent trips to France and the UK.
For the 3rd time of answering he doesn't want their their treatment paid out of the NHS....I don't see why this so difficult for you to get.
So how about this scenario?......They pay for their treatment...no repatriation , not left to die...or sent back home
And you think the kind of sums that treatment for major illnesses cost are readily available to most people?
But he likes to play the part of the man who tells it as it is but in this case it's a bit more than that. The 240,000 people who were in this country that he would refuse treatment to - he didn't state what their outcome would be because the options don't make great headlines. When he is being all bullish and manly he fails to connect that with real effects on real people. So in this case they would have to find the funds themselves as you suggest, or failing that their choices would be repatriation or a painful death. Finally we are getting somewhere....Finally it's sunk in....of course not which is why we should put UK patients first.
Regardless of which party you support, the NHS has a budget paid for by British people and is for the British people.
Lets take the 2 billion that we spend on health tourism and use it for our own patients who are suffering.....now I know that goes against the Labour Parties morally repugnant social agenda....isn't it time to prioritise our people and give them the treatment and care they need and deserve?
But he likes to play the part of the man who tells it as it is but in this case it's a bit more than that. The 240,000 people who were in this country that he would refuse treatment to - he didn't state what their outcome would be because the options don't make great headlines. When he is being all bullish and manly he fails to connect that with real effects on real people. So in this case they would have to find the funds themselves as you suggest, or failing that their choices would be repatriation or a painful death. Finally we are getting somewhere....
It's painfully slow AAS, but there is light at the end of the tunnel.
He said that we are treating people from overseas for free of charge....that's how it is...a fact.
He said that we should put British people first....now that is his opinion....you disagree with that....you want to put foreigners ahead of British patients, based on foreigners needs are higher than our own people who suffer....how much suffering pain and possibly death, do uk patients have because this money isn't spent on them?
Out of interest how many people from abroad with life threatening illnesses do you want to treat with money that is supposed to be for the British?
5000?...10,000...100,000....more?
Where does the British tax payers responsibility end?
Should our hospitals just open up to everyone, and provide free treatment for the whole of the world?
If as Labour say the tories are killing the NHS, how can we afford this?