londonshrimper.
Striker
Can confirm Kendall has been made available for transfer
See Quigley 13 games 0 goals. How many has Kendall scored and why would Woking let him go?
@London Shrimper its say, deal subject to personal terms, so in a way, Kendell only have to agree years on contract and wages to sign for us?
Can confirm Kendall has been made available for transfer
@London Shrimper its say, deal subject to personal terms, so in a way, Kendell only have to agree years on contract and wages to sign for us?
People said similar about Bim and look how that turned out? Think we need to give players a chance before being disappointed in them lolāProlific striker at Eastbourneā
Yeah, three years ago and a league below. Seven goals in three seasons since then.
Heād be a gamble signing who could work and pay off, but if it was as a mid-season arrival as a Bim replacement Iām not sure Iād be too delighted.
Some right weird ones inserted. Spencer Prior having to eat sheep's testicle before signing for Cardiff. Sounds like a bush tucker trial.There is more to personal terms than just length of contract and wages.
I reckon Luton would be a bit silly to do that. Shown some promise and looks like he could be a real player, but heās scored 7 goals in 17 appearances, 3 of which came against an Isthmian League North Division side.Bonne - 0 goals
Waldron - 0 goals
Walker - 3 goals
Bim - 7 goals of which 3 were Saturday against Brentwood (although he offers way more than goals)
Rumour ive seen is that Bim might be going back to Luton and loaned back out to a L1/2 side. If so this may explain the story
In fairness it sounds like weāve been a long term admirer and watched him a number of times. Sometimes players just donāt fit a side. Messi wouldnāt have put up the same numbers he did for Barcelona if he was playing for Stoke during their 4-4-2 hoofball ****house era. If we play a similar style to Eastbourne in which he could thrive, then it could be good business. I feel like we wouldnāt have chased him for this long if he was crap.āProlific striker at Eastbourneā
Yeah, three years ago and a league below. Seven goals in three seasons since then.
Heād be a gamble signing who could work and pay off, but if it was as a mid-season arrival as a Bim replacement Iām not sure Iād be too delighted.
Smells of GoodshipāProlific striker at Eastbourneā
Yeah, three years ago and a league below. Seven goals in three seasons since then.
Heād be a gamble signing who could work and pay off, but if it was as a mid-season arrival as a Bim replacement Iām not sure Iād be too delighted.
Let's just buy lots of strikers to solve goalscoring issue.
But let's ignore investment tactically and through certain player types on creating goals.
A large part of the reason why players succeed at new clubs is nothing to do with the club it's how the team plays
Smells of Goodship
Beggars can't be choosers but I feel he will be underwhelming, more so as we don't really create chances for our strikers. Would much prefer a player like Dackers who while not scoring much, is a handful and links the midfield and attack or maybe a bigger unit a la Quigley.
Is the sz way!Kendall has scored goals at the level below us. How many levels below did Goodship score his goals?
This āsmellsā nothing like Goodship.
Weāve been in for Kendall since two summers ago. We have a bid, for a fee (but obviously COSU arenāt putting money in on the footballing side) rejected in the summer just gone.
This couldnāt be any further than a āGoodshipā signing. Whilst he may or may not work out better than Goodship did, it isnāt a panic signing, isnāt a desperation signing, and isnāt a āGoodshipā signing.
Glad to see we are writing him off already.
Heād be much more of a Goodship signing - step 4 non-league is 3 levels below us, at least Kendall is currently playing at our level and was banging in goals one level below.Surely the guy from Brentwood would be a better punt?
Looking at the video clips, Kendall is clearly a good finisher. However, look at how many of his chances were made by team mates sliding in balls between the centre halves for him to run onto. We just don't play like that. I fear that he'll just have his back to goal the whole time which is why I believe Quigley is the type of player we need right now.Smells of Goodship
Beggars can't be choosers but I feel he will be underwhelming, more so as we don't really create chances for our strikers. Would much prefer a player like Dackers who while not scoring much, is a handful and links the midfield and attack or maybe a bigger unit a la Quigley.
Waldron was 'prolific' from only 1 league below. The step up is unbelievably difficult. Of course, it can happen but for every Langstaff, there will be 20 Goodship's.Surely the guy from Brentwood would be a better punt?