• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Breaking News Charley Kendall Signs

ā€œProlific striker at Eastbourneā€

Yeah, three years ago and a league below. Seven goals in three seasons since then.

Heā€™d be a gamble signing who could work and pay off, but if it was as a mid-season arrival as a Bim replacement Iā€™m not sure Iā€™d be too delighted.
 
ā€œProlific striker at Eastbourneā€

Yeah, three years ago and a league below. Seven goals in three seasons since then.

Heā€™d be a gamble signing who could work and pay off, but if it was as a mid-season arrival as a Bim replacement Iā€™m not sure Iā€™d be too delighted.
People said similar about Bim and look how that turned out? Think we need to give players a chance before being disappointed in them lol
 
There is more to personal terms than just length of contract and wages.
Some right weird ones inserted. Spencer Prior having to eat sheep's testicle before signing for Cardiff. Sounds like a bush tucker trial.

 
Let's just buy lots of strikers to solve goalscoring issue.

But let's ignore investment tactically and through certain player types on creating goals.

A large part of the reason why players succeed at new clubs is nothing to do with the club it's how the team plays
 
To be fair, Quigley would be right up our street - loads of games and zero goals to his name! I'll get my tin hat on.
 
Bonne - 0 goals
Waldron - 0 goals
Walker - 3 goals
Bim - 7 goals of which 3 were Saturday against Brentwood (although he offers way more than goals)

Rumour ive seen is that Bim might be going back to Luton and loaned back out to a L1/2 side. If so this may explain the story
I reckon Luton would be a bit silly to do that. Shown some promise and looks like he could be a real player, but heā€™s scored 7 goals in 17 appearances, 3 of which came against an Isthmian League North Division side.

Best thing they could do is leave him with us for the remainder of the season. 4 goals in 15 games at NL level doesnā€™t suggest heā€™s a League One or Two player at this stage in his career. Love the guy, but still got lots to learn and needs to keep playing regularly.
 
Last edited:
ā€œProlific striker at Eastbourneā€

Yeah, three years ago and a league below. Seven goals in three seasons since then.

Heā€™d be a gamble signing who could work and pay off, but if it was as a mid-season arrival as a Bim replacement Iā€™m not sure Iā€™d be too delighted.
In fairness it sounds like weā€™ve been a long term admirer and watched him a number of times. Sometimes players just donā€™t fit a side. Messi wouldnā€™t have put up the same numbers he did for Barcelona if he was playing for Stoke during their 4-4-2 hoofball ****house era. If we play a similar style to Eastbourne in which he could thrive, then it could be good business. I feel like we wouldnā€™t have chased him for this long if he was crap.
 
ā€œProlific striker at Eastbourneā€

Yeah, three years ago and a league below. Seven goals in three seasons since then.

Heā€™d be a gamble signing who could work and pay off, but if it was as a mid-season arrival as a Bim replacement Iā€™m not sure Iā€™d be too delighted.
Smells of Goodship

Beggars can't be choosers but I feel he will be underwhelming, more so as we don't really create chances for our strikers. Would much prefer a player like Dackers who while not scoring much, is a handful and links the midfield and attack or maybe a bigger unit a la Quigley.
 
Let's just buy lots of strikers to solve goalscoring issue.

But let's ignore investment tactically and through certain player types on creating goals.

A large part of the reason why players succeed at new clubs is nothing to do with the club it's how the team plays

We arenā€™t just after a striker as LS has pointed out. It just happens that we are able to bring in a striker first.

We arenā€™t going to say, hang on no not yet, we need others firstā€¦
 
Smells of Goodship

Beggars can't be choosers but I feel he will be underwhelming, more so as we don't really create chances for our strikers. Would much prefer a player like Dackers who while not scoring much, is a handful and links the midfield and attack or maybe a bigger unit a la Quigley.

Kendall has scored goals at the level below us. How many levels below did Goodship score his goals?

This ā€œsmellsā€ nothing like Goodship.

Weā€™ve been in for Kendall since two summers ago. We have a bid, for a fee (but obviously COSU arenā€™t putting money in on the footballing side) rejected in the summer just gone.

This couldnā€™t be any further than a ā€œGoodshipā€ signing. Whilst he may or may not work out better than Goodship did, it isnā€™t a panic signing, isnā€™t a desperation signing, and isnā€™t a ā€œGoodshipā€ signing.

Glad to see we are writing him off already.
 
Kendall has scored goals at the level below us. How many levels below did Goodship score his goals?

This ā€œsmellsā€ nothing like Goodship.

Weā€™ve been in for Kendall since two summers ago. We have a bid, for a fee (but obviously COSU arenā€™t putting money in on the footballing side) rejected in the summer just gone.

This couldnā€™t be any further than a ā€œGoodshipā€ signing. Whilst he may or may not work out better than Goodship did, it isnā€™t a panic signing, isnā€™t a desperation signing, and isnā€™t a ā€œGoodshipā€ signing.

Glad to see we are writing him off already.
Is the sz way!

Then he scores one off his arse, is the best player ever and going to Peterborough for 2.5m
 
Surely the guy from Brentwood would be a better punt?
Heā€™d be much more of a Goodship signing - step 4 non-league is 3 levels below us, at least Kendall is currently playing at our level and was banging in goals one level below.

I canā€™t see that Ogunleye from Brentwood Town would be a ā€œbetter puntā€ when weā€™ve seen how difficult it has been for Danny Waldron to make the step up just one level.
 
Smells of Goodship

Beggars can't be choosers but I feel he will be underwhelming, more so as we don't really create chances for our strikers. Would much prefer a player like Dackers who while not scoring much, is a handful and links the midfield and attack or maybe a bigger unit a la Quigley.
Looking at the video clips, Kendall is clearly a good finisher. However, look at how many of his chances were made by team mates sliding in balls between the centre halves for him to run onto. We just don't play like that. I fear that he'll just have his back to goal the whole time which is why I believe Quigley is the type of player we need right now.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top