• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Breaking News WUP Court Hearing - 4th October- Case Dismissed.

Will be interesting to see what happens on Tuesday 3rd October wont it.

Bailiffs/nPower workers I guess will again be waiting to shut the power off at RH, pending the judgement, just before we kick off v Oxford City.

Will the lights go out for one final time? ☹️
If they were successful the other day, they would not have been able to shut the power off before the game.

Hopefully should they succeed on the 3rd October, they won't be able to access the site the same day...
 
I would say going 14 points adrift from safety Ron gone, that’s a worthwhile trade… Only if our new owners promise money for signings…
 
Tweet above has been shared - but it's now been confirmed that the appeal was refused yesterday and the 10 point deduction remains in place (no surprise there).

I do, however, stand corrected and it is in fact a further 10 point deduction if we enter administration (https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/files.pitchero.com/leagues/13676_1691057466.pdf) - not that it eases the pain much.


Just to clarify a few points from my Tweet:
  • The case involving nPower is at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on 3 October 2023 at 10am - not the Crown Court, as someone said above, or in the High Court, as the Echo are reporting.
  • When I tweeted "will not be at High Court on 4 Oct, but would not say why" - this is about the club, not specifically Ron (perhaps could have been worded better on my part, but restricted to a character limit).
  • Ron was certain about the court hearing not going ahead 4 October 2023 - which suggests either the money owed will be settled in full, he hopes to have some sort of deal done with HMRC and the other creditors, or he is content for us to enter administration.
  • I fear the latter, and Justin Rees' statement (https://www.shrimperzone.com/forums/threads/justin-rees-statement-20th-september.116191/) the following day noted "As such, it has been our strong preference to avoid Administration, however this is of course not within our control." For me, the fact he is addressing administration makes it seem that this is inevitable and he is making clear that this is not his fault, hence mention of the two bids this week that have failed.

Been told Sky Sports News mentioned the toy rat protests during the game the other night. Also great that ITV News highlighted the protests and current situation at the club last night - we need as much national exposure as we can get at present. ITV will continue to monitor the situation.

A few people jumped on my back 3 or so months ago when I tweeted "Little reported by Chris Phillips & the Echo.". I made it clear that I wasn't knocking Chris or his efforts. His footballing reporting is great. However, there had been little pressure or exposure of Ron Martin at the time by the Echo. The front page today, though, is excellent, albeit too late.

The protests need to be ramped up. Two home games left before 4 October, one of which is a Tuesday night game the day before. This Saturday is key. Hopefully something else is on the horizon, in addition to the march, which will again bring us some much-needed coverage.

If we enter administration then the consequences are ghastly:
  • 10 point deduction (almost certainty for relegation to the NL South, but you never know with these boys)
  • The hope would be to generate a better return for creditors than they would get in a liquidation and try to rebalance the books so to speak
  • The club would first need to pay in full the salaries of all players and management, as well as the league and other clubs for any transfer fees not yet paid (understand Altrincham are still waiting to be paid in full for Dan Mooney)
  • The accountants put in charge then try and secure the best deals on all the monies owed to the creditors - this is preferential for them as they'd get less if we were liquidated
  • HMRC would obviously only then be paid a fraction of what it is owed
  • Likely that our most valuable assets would be sold to assist with this, i.e. our best players
  • The club cannot be in administration for more than 18 months
  • Liquidation is a threat - if the accountants find that the club does not own enough assets to pay the creditors then we will be liquidated and closed down (look at Chester, Darlington, Bury, etc.)
  • Administration is not necessarily the end though (look at Southampton, Huddersfield, Derby, Stockport, etc.)
If we do enter administration the protests need to be like never before.

I am told that Justin Rees is still working away on a negotiations, but Ron is yet to accept anything on the table.

Also been told that there was someone from another group at the game on Tuesday night possibly interested in buying the club, but that is no where near as advanced as the Australian consortium.

Just praying for this mess to come to an end. The players, management staff and fans do not deserve this.

#MartinOut 🐀
 
Will be interesting to see what happens on Tuesday 3rd October wont it.

Bailiffs/nPower workers I guess will again be waiting to shut the power off at RH, pending the judgement, just before we kick off v Oxford City.

Will the lights go out for one final time? ☹️

No surrender
 
LS

“The club would first need to pay in full the salaries of all players and management, as well as the league and other clubs for any transfer fees not yet paid (understand Altrincham are still waiting to be paid in full for Dan Mooney”

Wasnt Mooney signed on a free ?


I guess if anything was due it could be training compensation but even if that were that case is there not a case therefore that all football creditors weren’t paid ?

My head hurts !
 
LS

“The club would first need to pay in full the salaries of all players and management, as well as the league and other clubs for any transfer fees not yet paid (understand Altrincham are still waiting to be paid in full for Dan Mooney”

Wasnt Mooney signed on a free ?



I guess if anything was due it could be training compensation but even if that were that case is there not a case therefore that all football creditors weren’t paid ?

My head hurts !

Mooney was 22 when he signed - maybe compensation under age of 24?

Perhaps it’s payable over the length of his contract - so due in stages?
 
Excellent post.
The mention of Scunthorpe is particularly relevant and I would suggest everyone read this statement issued by their current chairman

Whilst it of course deals with Scunthorpe its wo the looking at some of the numbers quoted to try and gain some true context in terms of the sums involved in running a NL club


Jeez...... that's a mountain of money...
 
Mooney was 22 when he signed - maybe compensation under age of 24?

Perhaps it’s payable over the length of his contract - so due in stages?

Correct.

95% of transfer fees are paid over the duration of the players contract. Previously, we’ve owed transfer fees on a player we’ve sold. That’s how Chelsea have avoided FFP penalties for their spend. The players have been given massive length of contracts, so the transfer fee is distorted. Also, selling academy products help as they are classed as 100% profit.

We fell behind on the payment schedule for Mooney. However, I believe we’ve fully paid off Kensdale’s move.
 
I still can't understand that as the club has no assets and no money how can it pay its creditors? If the only assets are the player's registrations, how much would that bring in?
 
Will be interesting to see what happens on Tuesday 3rd October wont it.

Bailiffs/nPower workers I guess will again be waiting to shut the power off at RH, pending the judgement, just before we kick off v Oxford City.

Will the lights go out for one final time? ☹️
when bailiffs turn up unexpectedly…
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0612.jpeg
    IMG_0612.jpeg
    19 KB · Views: 18
Tweet above has been shared - but it's now been confirmed that the appeal was refused yesterday and the 10 point deduction remains in place (no surprise there).

I do, however, stand corrected and it is in fact a further 10 point deduction if we enter administration (https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/files.pitchero.com/leagues/13676_1691057466.pdf) - not that it eases the pain much.


Just to clarify a few points from my Tweet:
  • The case involving nPower is at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on 3 October 2023 at 10am - not the Crown Court, as someone said above, or in the High Court, as the Echo are reporting.
  • When I tweeted "will not be at High Court on 4 Oct, but would not say why" - this is about the club, not specifically Ron (perhaps could have been worded better on my part, but restricted to a character limit).
  • Ron was certain about the court hearing not going ahead 4 October 2023 - which suggests either the money owed will be settled in full, he hopes to have some sort of deal done with HMRC and the other creditors, or he is content for us to enter administration.
  • I fear the latter, and Justin Rees' statement (https://www.shrimperzone.com/forums/threads/justin-rees-statement-20th-september.116191/) the following day noted "As such, it has been our strong preference to avoid Administration, however this is of course not within our control." For me, the fact he is addressing administration makes it seem that this is inevitable and he is making clear that this is not his fault, hence mention of the two bids this week that have failed.

Been told Sky Sports News mentioned the toy rat protests during the game the other night. Also great that ITV News highlighted the protests and current situation at the club last night - we need as much national exposure as we can get at present. ITV will continue to monitor the situation.

A few people jumped on my back 3 or so months ago when I tweeted "Little reported by Chris Phillips & the Echo.". I made it clear that I wasn't knocking Chris or his efforts. His footballing reporting is great. However, there had been little pressure or exposure of Ron Martin at the time by the Echo. The front page today, though, is excellent, albeit too late.

The protests need to be ramped up. Two home games left before 4 October, one of which is a Tuesday night game the day before. This Saturday is key. Hopefully something else is on the horizon, in addition to the march, which will again bring us some much-needed coverage.

If we enter administration then the consequences are ghastly:
  • 10 point deduction (almost certainty for relegation to the NL South, but you never know with these boys)
  • The hope would be to generate a better return for creditors than they would get in a liquidation and try to rebalance the books so to speak
  • The club would first need to pay in full the salaries of all players and management, as well as the league and other clubs for any transfer fees not yet paid (understand Altrincham are still waiting to be paid in full for Dan Mooney)
  • The accountants put in charge then try and secure the best deals on all the monies owed to the creditors - this is preferential for them as they'd get less if we were liquidated
  • HMRC would obviously only then be paid a fraction of what it is owed
  • Likely that our most valuable assets would be sold to assist with this, i.e. our best players
  • The club cannot be in administration for more than 18 months
  • Liquidation is a threat - if the accountants find that the club does not own enough assets to pay the creditors then we will be liquidated and closed down (look at Chester, Darlington, Bury, etc.)
  • Administration is not necessarily the end though (look at Southampton, Huddersfield, Derby, Stockport, etc.)
If we do enter administration the protests need to be like never before.

I am told that Justin Rees is still working away on a negotiations, but Ron is yet to accept anything on the table.

Also been told that there was someone from another group at the game on Tuesday night possibly interested in buying the club, but that is no where near as advanced as the Australian consortium.

Just praying for this mess to come to an end. The players, management staff and fans do not deserve this.

#MartinOut 🐀
I think administration in the way you describe it is unlikely.

Can't see us being able to trade under an administrator as we are in practical terms insolvent.

A sale of any players that have any meaningful value (and within the NL as EFL window is shut) will raise probably not enough to cover the administrator's costs let alone allow a creditors distribution. And it all takes time, and we have to be able to fulfil fixtures.

If its not a pre-arranged (pre-pack) sale with either a new buyer or Ron putting an agreed and meaningful sum in to meet a % of creditors liabilities (and in line with league requirements to retain license) then I can't see administration being approved by the court? Maybe others who know more know better?

What JR's statement does indicate to me (and I could be wrong) is that some sort of pre-pack option has been floated in talks as an alternative if the consortium can't meet the asking price. JR wants to avoid this and so its at the same time both a negotiating ploy/threat and an option?

West Stand is right that such arrangements take time and aren't easy. But if administration without a pre-pack is unrealistic, and given this has been going on for weeks, and the WUP for months, then surely in the background plans have been developed for such an eventuality? Of course, another hint was creating floating charges on debt as has been mentioned- and again this was months ago.
 
Last edited:
Correct.

95% of transfer fees are paid over the duration of the players contract. Previously, we’ve owed transfer fees on a player we’ve sold. That’s how Chelsea have avoided FFP penalties for their spend. The players have been given massive length of contracts, so the transfer fee is distorted. Also, selling academy products help as they are classed as 100% profit.

We fell behind on the payment schedule for Mooney. However, I believe we’ve fully paid off Kensdale’s move.
Whilst you are correct that in the vast majority of transfer fees are paid over a period of time LS said “All the fee” which to me suggested nothing had been paid


You are correct that selling academy players is classed as a 100% profit . Chelsea however have merely taken advantage of the rules around amortisation of the fee .

A players fee is amortised over the period of the contract. Pay £2 million on a 5 year deal and a sum of £400k is written off ( depreciated) it matters not a jot how much if the fee has paid or remains outstanding its a simple division of the fee.
 
I still can't understand that as the club has no assets and no money how can it pay its creditors? If the only assets are the player's registrations, how much would that bring in?
Out of the EFL window, and a distressed sale, in realistic terms not enough..
 
Whilst you are correct that in the vast majority of transfer fees are paid over a period of time LS said “All the fee” which to me suggested nothing had been paid


You are correct that selling academy players is classed as a 100% profit . Chelsea however have merely taken advantage of the rules around amortisation of the fee .

A players fee is amortised over the period of the contract. Pay £2 million on a 5 year deal and a sum of £400k is written off ( depreciated) it matters not a jot how much if the fee has paid or remains outstanding its a simple division of the fee.

The first instalment of Mooney’s fee was paid. I believe that is the only one however.
 
So EOn are really planning to send bailiffs in? The dirty no good b@st@rds!

FRANKFURT, July 27 (Reuters) - E.ON (EONGn.DE), Europe's largest energy networks operator, on Thursday reported a 64% rise in adjusted net profit during the first six months of the year, citing a stabilisation in energy markets, and it raised its forecasts for 2023.

The profit increase and upgrade in outlook underscore a broader sector recovery from last year's energy crisis in the wake of the Ukraine war.

Adjusted net profit was 2.3 billion euros ($2.53 billion) in the first six months of the year, up from 1.4 billion a year earlier, E.ON reported in an unscheduled release.

https://www.reuters.com/business/en...orecasts-energy-markets-stabilise-2023-07-27/
 
Tweet above has been shared - but it's now been confirmed that the appeal was refused yesterday and the 10 point deduction remains in place (no surprise there).

I do, however, stand corrected and it is in fact a further 10 point deduction if we enter administration (https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/files.pitchero.com/leagues/13676_1691057466.pdf) - not that it eases the pain much.


Just to clarify a few points from my Tweet:
  • The case involving nPower is at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on 3 October 2023 at 10am - not the Crown Court, as someone said above, or in the High Court, as the Echo are reporting.
  • When I tweeted "will not be at High Court on 4 Oct, but would not say why" - this is about the club, not specifically Ron (perhaps could have been worded better on my part, but restricted to a character limit).
  • Ron was certain about the court hearing not going ahead 4 October 2023 - which suggests either the money owed will be settled in full, he hopes to have some sort of deal done with HMRC and the other creditors, or he is content for us to enter administration.
  • I fear the latter, and Justin Rees' statement (https://www.shrimperzone.com/forums/threads/justin-rees-statement-20th-september.116191/) the following day noted "As such, it has been our strong preference to avoid Administration, however this is of course not within our control." For me, the fact he is addressing administration makes it seem that this is inevitable and he is making clear that this is not his fault, hence mention of the two bids this week that have failed.

Been told Sky Sports News mentioned the toy rat protests during the game the other night. Also great that ITV News highlighted the protests and current situation at the club last night - we need as much national exposure as we can get at present. ITV will continue to monitor the situation.

A few people jumped on my back 3 or so months ago when I tweeted "Little reported by Chris Phillips & the Echo.". I made it clear that I wasn't knocking Chris or his efforts. His footballing reporting is great. However, there had been little pressure or exposure of Ron Martin at the time by the Echo. The front page today, though, is excellent, albeit too late.

The protests need to be ramped up. Two home games left before 4 October, one of which is a Tuesday night game the day before. This Saturday is key. Hopefully something else is on the horizon, in addition to the march, which will again bring us some much-needed coverage.

If we enter administration then the consequences are ghastly:
  • 10 point deduction (almost certainty for relegation to the NL South, but you never know with these boys)
  • The hope would be to generate a better return for creditors than they would get in a liquidation and try to rebalance the books so to speak
  • The club would first need to pay in full the salaries of all players and management, as well as the league and other clubs for any transfer fees not yet paid (understand Altrincham are still waiting to be paid in full for Dan Mooney)
  • The accountants put in charge then try and secure the best deals on all the monies owed to the creditors - this is preferential for them as they'd get less if we were liquidated
  • HMRC would obviously only then be paid a fraction of what it is owed
  • Likely that our most valuable assets would be sold to assist with this, i.e. our best players
  • The club cannot be in administration for more than 18 months
  • Liquidation is a threat - if the accountants find that the club does not own enough assets to pay the creditors then we will be liquidated and closed down (look at Chester, Darlington, Bury, etc.)
  • Administration is not necessarily the end though (look at Southampton, Huddersfield, Derby, Stockport, etc.)
If we do enter administration the protests need to be like never before.

I am told that Justin Rees is still working away on a negotiations, but Ron is yet to accept anything on the table.

Also been told that there was someone from another group at the game on Tuesday night possibly interested in buying the club, but that is no where near as advanced as the Australian consortium.

Just praying for this mess to come to an end. The players, management staff and fans do not deserve this.

#MartinOut 🐀
The Administrator will attempt to sell the Club as a going concern, which is a sort of positive. However, I fear more for our management team remaining intact as he or she would be looking to cut costs to try and match expenditure to income.
 
Administration and another 10 point deduction. That’s 20 point deficit.

Based on last season we’d have escaped relegation by 1 point.

If we can keep the players we currently have, find a buyer and get a few more faces in then I’d be confident we’ll survive in the NL. Won’t be that simple sadly.
 
The Administrator will attempt to sell the Club as a going concern, which is a sort of positive. However, I fear more for our management team remaining intact as he or she would be looking to cut costs to try and match expenditure to income.
I worked for a Print Co in 1990 which went into administration, They are brutal in so much as their simple aim is to cut costs, & they don't give a damn about who they discard to save money. IF this happens with us, i fear we'd be ruined?.
It's gonna be a long 2 weeks.
 
Back
Top