• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

When will the takeover go through? The Waiting Game...

A very good update.
I have to say I am not sensing this will be done in advance of the court date. Next Friday 7th June they will be reviewing answers to questions and further information regarding the first two areas of DD, but will be reviewing for the first time a "summary" (not detailed) report of the third area of DD. It then would seem very likely that this will slip into week ending 14th June.

Clearly then 2 weeks for external financial audit and 2 weeks for SCC is nowhere near compatible with completion by the court date on 26th June- what was suggested as needing 28 days would have say 11 days..? Unless I am missing something? And that assumes DD finally and at last complete by 14th June...

At some point this apparent conflict will have to be addressed? (PS no doubt someone will point out again the WUP was marked "final"- although I'm not sure it ever is)
 
Last edited:
A very good update.
I have to say I am not sensing this will be done in advance of the court date. Next Friday 7th June they will be reviewing answers to questions and further information regarding the first two areas of DD, but will be reviewing for the first time a "summary" (not detailed) report of the third area of DD. It then would seem very likely that this will slip into week ending 14th June.

Clearly then 2 weeks for external financial audit and 2 weeks for SCC is nowhere near compatible with completion by the court date on 26th June- what was suggested as needing 28 days would have say 11 days..? Unless I am missing something?

At some point this conflict will have to be addressed.?
I would like to think (maybe it’s wishful thinking) that if all parties can show significant progress has been made then an adjournment would be granted on the 26th.

If that happens then we still have the big issue regarding the national league authorities and licence to participate/points deductions etc….
 
I think the issue is the initial timescales were crap.

I'd argue it'd be a little difficult to go quicker at this stage - they've given what, 4 working days for third parties to work on the queries - now we obviously don't know what the queries are, but that doesn't seem to me like dragging their feet.

Rather than timescales i'm more concerned if there'll be agreement at all! If the deal still looks like going ahead I think it's more likely we get an adjournment than wound up.
 
Last edited:
I would like to think (maybe it’s wishful thinking) that if all parties can show significant progress has been made then an adjournment would be granted on the 26th.

If that happens then we still have the big issue regarding the national league authorities and licence to participate/points deductions etc….
Very probably there will be another extension. Probably Cllr Cowan may have to join Ron and Justin in court to assure the judge it really is very close (or write a nice letter) - in which case no judge would wind up.

The league may set a deadline just before season starts for something to happen- clear WUP and file overdue accounts or maybe not.

Kev will start pre-season with an embargo in place and no signings. If he wants to sign any players from clubs in lower divisions who desperately need a pre-season maybe they don't get one. Its Groundhog Day!
 
I would like to think (maybe it’s wishful thinking) that if all parties can show significant progress has been made then an adjournment would be granted on the 26th.

If that happens then we still have the big issue regarding the national league authorities and licence to participate/points deductions etc….
I agree. The aim will be to get best deal for creditors and if DD and just waiting audit and council sign off then I can see Stewart Law supporting an adjournment and judge rubber stamping. If the DD throws up problems they might not be as willing to support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JD
I think the issue is the initial timescales were crap.

I'd argue it'd be a little difficult to go quicker at this stage - they've given what, 4 working days for third parties to work on the queries - now we obviously don't know what the queries are, but that doesn't seem to me like dragging their feet.

Rather than timescales i'm more concerned if they'll be agreement at all! If the deal still looks like going ahead I think it's more likely we get an adjournment than wound up.
But can there be adjournment when it’s been marked final ?
 
Very probably there will be another extension. Probably Cllr Cowan may have to join Ron and Justin in court to assure the judge it really is very close (or write a nice letter) - in which case no judge would wind up.

The league may set a deadline just before season starts for something to happen- clear WUP and file overdue accounts or maybe not.

Kev will start pre-season with an embargo in place and no signings. If he wants to sign any players from clubs in lower divisions who desperately need a pre-season maybe they don't get one. Its Groundhog Day!
Justin will not be around he is heading back to Aus next week.
 
No urgency whatsoever and that’s coz they couldn’t give a toss about the football club. But yeah let’s just throw out a statement once a week to make it look like we are doing something where in reality nothing is happening

That's a bit harsh. If the council doesn't communicate they are criticised, if they do communicate they are criticised. Ron Martin has deliberately created and interwoven a web of companies in the financial dealings so it is no surprise that it is taking a long time to sort it out. Nobody is to blame but him.
 
Alternatively
Ronnie and Consortium chip in, along with Citizen Housing , the trust puts I another £1000 and the Council lend the club £15 k , au urgent charity ball is held and the postcode lottery manages a £10 contribution; ShrimperZone members donate another £5 k and Colchester send a friendly £10 k Banksy does a pic on the pier , Alison Moyet Knocks out an impromptu concert , proceeds to the Shrimpers , Stan joins the Consortium and best of all Cricko offers to auction his famous satin pyjamas and we’ve done it, raised £65 k Simples! The Wup is cleared in less than a fortnight
 
Outcomes 1&2 or 2&3….. big difference in confidence levels depending on the answer.
Someone has asked the question on X.
Yeah, I was wondering about this, I’m glad someone’s asked for clarification. While I appreciate the updates this part was as clear as mud.
 
Back
Top