Agree with all but the last sentence.This decision in no way reflects adversely on the Kimura company involved. It was a decision about the effect of an offer to Kimura to settle a claim before trial. It involved a decision about a technical point arising under the rules of court. Nothing to see here.
There is plenty to see here and this is a very interesting find, particularly if you trace it back to the original decision. We knew next to nothing about Kimura (something that people seem surprisingly ok with) and this offers us a real insight into their business, what sort of sums they were lending, details of their Cayman entity that actually carries out the business, the interest charged, their legal spend, what other preoccupations they may have had during the bidding process.
This also likely impacts their tolerance for legal risk as having just been stung for $5m they are likely going to be more cautious with the contractual negotiations with a character as slippery as Ron.
In a thread full of speculation here is some actually verified information on one of the parties involved.