• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

SUFC: The Future SUFC up for sale

Forums New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
MattE said:
See post 6249

Although the link now has the statement about exclusivity removed. Glad I cut and pasted the sentence.

So I guess CP has changed the article. And we can assume that exclusivity has not been granted
Click to expand...
No its still there on CP twitter feed in black and white for anyone who can be bother to read it.
Exclusivity granted to the Kimura group.

It was also retweeted by Matt slater on his feed.

So you have 2 respected journalist saying 3 days ago, that the Kimura group have exclusivity

I know who i believe.
 
Last edited:
shrimper61 said:
No its still there on CP twitter feed in black ana white for anyone who can be bother to read it.
Exclusivity granted to the Kimura group.

It was also re twitter by Matt slater on his feed.

So you have 2 respected journalist saying 3 days ago, that the Kimura group have exclusivity

I know who i believe.
Click to expand...
Yes but other people information you don't have! Will they tell you? No! Will they tease you but then refuse to elaborate, of course!

Personally, whether other posters, ITK posters, etc, like it or not, I personally think if you are not willing to elaborate on the info your sharing and create this game of guessing for fans who just want to know what's happening with their club, don't post it. In my eyes, the whole 'I have sources I respect', I do not understand because you've already broken the first barrier of trust by even teasing it. It's all just playing games with fans feelings because they know something you don't.
 
JAL said:
Yes but other people information you don't have! Will they tell you? No! Will they tease you but then refuse to elaborate, of course!

Personally, whether other posters, ITK posters, etc, like it or not, I personally think if you are not willing to elaborate on the info your sharing and create this game of guessing for fans who just want to know what's happening with their club, don't post it. In my eyes, the whole 'I have sources I respect', I do not understand because you've already broken the first barrier of trust by even teasing it. It's all just playing games with fans feelings because they know something you don't.
Click to expand...

Not at all.

If you, or anyone else wants to believe that, then that’s fine.

As I’ve always said, I post my bits, mainly on transfer targets and that type of thing, and stay clear of financial issues and haven’t got too involved in the takeover.

I post what I’m allowed to, to let other fans know what’s going on. Not to show off of anything like that. I’m obviously not allowed to name names, but I can say that we are interested in a player who was outstanding in the NLS last season. I can’t tell you a name, and I won’t confirm or deny names either. That is one that no-one else has hinted at yet. Let’s leave that to the Summer Transfer Rumour Thread for guesses on that.

If people don’t want to know, that’s fine.

No ITK poster will break the trust of their sources, they won’t be able to “prove it” like some people demand. You either take their word, or just skip by it.
 
BoyWonder2 said:
Not at all.

If you, or anyone else wants to believe that, then that’s fine.

As I’ve always said, I post my bits, mainly on transfer targets and that type of thing, and stay clear of financial issues and haven’t got too involved in the takeover.

I post what I’m allowed to, to let other fans know what’s going on. Not to show off of anything like that. I’m obviously not allowed to name names, but I can say that we are interested in a player who was outstanding in the NLS last season. I can’t tell you a name, and I won’t confirm or deny names either. That is one that no-one else has hinted at yet. Let’s leave that to the Summer Transfer Rumour Thread for guesses on that.

If people don’t want to know, that’s fine.

No ITK poster will break the trust of their sources, they won’t be able to “prove it” like some people demand. You either take their word, or just skip by it.
Click to expand...
I've not really ever had a problem around your posts, you've always been honest and to the point with information you know with transfers, but seeing some of the things that people 'know' on here regarding the sale and how they've gone about it is just plain sad really. It's hard to take someone's word of their information when they're pretending to sit on this pedestal and refuse to elaborate because they're cradling their sources at night, either share it or don't.
 
JAL said:
I've not really ever had a problem around your posts, you've always been honest and to the point with information you know with transfers, but seeing some of the things that people 'know' on here regarding the sale and how they've gone about it is just plain sad really. It's hard to take someone's word of their information when they're pretending to sit on this pedestal and refuse to elaborate because they're cradling their sources at night, either share it or don't.
Click to expand...
You think people should value their real-life relationships lower than the opinions of anons on a message board? I would say that's 'plain sad'.
 
As l am still temporarily 5 hours behind. Catching up on the majority of a days posts and making an overall judgement seems much simpler. May even try to carry it on when l get back.

In the meantime, it seems there is a little way to go, with or without a certain person possibly trying to complicate things, but l am hopeful of a successful conclusion, that will bring us all together with some stability and positive leadership at the top for a change.

In the meantime, I raise my banana Daquiri filled glass to each and everyone of you, hang in there and remember we are all Shrimpers to the core!
 
BoyWonder2 said:
Not at all.

If you, or anyone else wants to believe that, then that’s fine.

As I’ve always said, I post my bits, mainly on transfer targets and that type of thing, and stay clear of financial issues and haven’t got too involved in the takeover.

I post what I’m allowed to, to let other fans know what’s going on. Not to show off of anything like that. I’m obviously not allowed to name names, but I can say that we are interested in a player who was outstanding in the NLS last season. I can’t tell you a name, and I won’t confirm or deny names either. That is one that no-one else has hinted at yet. Let’s leave that to the Summer Transfer Rumour Thread for guesses on that.

If people don’t want to know, that’s fine.

No ITK poster will break the trust of their sources, they won’t be able to “prove it” like some people demand. You either take their word, or just skip by it.
Click to expand...
BTW I don’t see CP or Matt Slater sharing their sources either. Perhaps they should keep quiet too? Don’t think so.
 
How is it that a few days ago, it was Kimura are closing in on ownership and now it seems like it's far from certain.

What has changed.
 
The fact is that RM is playing with fire. No news or progress announced, the cost for the DD process could exceed £500k. For an entity to spend that without any guarantee or announcement is a very gutsy punt, especially when you are dealing with a complex structure with no transparency.
 
Ramesses III said:
the cost for the DD process could exceed £500k.
Click to expand...
If thats normal, perhaps where Ron is involved, might be worth doubling!

In all seriousness, as you suggest, in order to start throwing around that kind of money, you would hope to be given a period of exclusivity. It would be like having a survey on a house without first agreeing a price and sold subject to contract.
 
Exactly, do you think any right minded person would stomach that with a fresh air stadium? just built based on plans? its a very hard process.... especially now two other bidders have been thrown in. The fact that it seems to be public knowledge will hold everything up now. Greed is the bottom line here.
 
ColinMorrisWalksOnWater said:
As l am still temporarily 5 hours behind. Catching up on the majority of a days posts and making an overall judgement seems much simpler. May even try to carry it on when l get back.

In the meantime, it seems there is a little way to go, with or without a certain person possibly trying to complicate things, but l am hopeful of a successful conclusion, that will bring us all together with some stability and positive leadership at the top for a change.

In the meantime, I raise my banana Daquiri filled glass to each and everyone of you, hang in there and remember we are all Shrimpers to the core!
Click to expand...
Banana?? You are Kevin and I claim my £5
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

.



Club News
Fixtures and Results
League Table
SUFC Ticket Stats
Shrimpers Trust
SoccerBase
SUEPA (Ex Players)
Shrimperzone on Facebook
Shrimperzone on Twitter
Shrimperzone on Instagram


ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top