Husin's stats are absolutely horrid for such a talented player. I'm pretty sure his assist tally isn't much better either.
Goal involvements for central midfielders 2024/25 (league only):
Coker: 5 goals + 4 assists in 1899 minutes (a goal involvement every 211 minutes)
Parillon: 0 goals + 4 assists in 995 minutes (a goal involvement every 249 minutes)
Appiah-Forson: 2 goals + 1 assist in 1635 minutes (a goal involvement every 545 minutes)
Morton: 0 goals + 2 assists in 3101 minutes (a goal involvement every 1551 minutes)
Husin: 1 goal + 0 assists in 3281 minutes (a goal involvement every 3281 minutes)
Miley: 0 goals + 0 assists in 1258 minutes (no goal involvements)
Last season Husin scored 4 league goals and contributed 1 assist in 3690 minutes, so a goal involvement every 738 minutes. I would say that he (as well as Coker (6+3 in 2274 minutes, a goal involvement every 253 minutes) on occasions) was deployed in a more deep-lying role at times when Miley wasn't available so this season, with Miley or Morton able to perform that role more often, this demonstrates how disappointing a campaign Husin has had. Husin had an average of 1.5 shots per game in 2023/24; this season that has dropped significantly to 0.9.
Midfielders who score exist - we simply don’t seem interested in signing them. If Coker wasn’t already ours maybe we would take sign him either.
Local boy Josh Rees has 75 goals in 295 appearances (start or sub) in the NL with 21 assists.
29 goals and 11 assists in 89 appearances most recently at Daggers…
352 provides a great opportunity to accommodate an attacking MF
Other alternatives exist.
No doubt would involve a level of investing in the team but what is the point of 9k plus gates if you can’t compete with Daggers…
Just for comparison, Josh Rees has 13 goals and 4 assists in 3510 minutes (in a struggling Daggers team) this season, which is a goal involvement every 207 minutes, so Coker compares fairly well with that.
The Academy has consistently produced decent attacking midfield options to play either in midfield or as a number 10 in modern parlance. Jack Bridge came through in that position, then Jack Payne, followed by Coker and then Henry Sandat, so I don't believe it's a role that the club ignores purposefully, even if we haven't necessarily recruited heavily in that position.
I actually think, and have said before, Coker is a more rounded player now than he was coming through in the Academy, and his output shouldn't just be judged by goal involvements (as, indeed, it's not worth doing with Morton and Miley because they are performing a different role for the team). He does a lot of unfussy, unnoticed things in midfield; he makes intelligent runs off the ball, he links play with crisper passing than many of his team-mates and defensively he is improving; if you check out Pepple's goal at Halifax, which was largely heralded as a goal out of nothing, it came about before Morton pressed an opponent into a mistake, turning over possession, and that was only possible because Coker swept round to cover the space he would normally occupy, creating a solid base from which to press from.
I suspect the club have plenty of data on Parillon that isn't as freely available on the internet, and that he is being eyed as the preferred option in an attacking midfield role, but I agree that 3-5-2 provides an opportunity to play at least one goalscoring midfielder, if not two options in that role.
As for tomorrow, I'd probably stick with the midfield that started at Ebbsfleet, allowing us to bring Parillon off the bench as a genuine attacking option if the game is tight and we need something in the second half, although I appreciate there's also a valid argument for starting with Parillon and Coker and trying to get ahead of the game early.