Our fans don't appreciate the role of the targetman. Rory Fallon is better than both Matt Harrold and Alex Revell but had he signed for us he'd have been the new terrace hate figure within weeks.
Leave the guy alone, it's early days yet.
Is Matt still injured or just not in the 1st team picture now?
Wasn't on the subs bench so was wondering if we'll see him again much now with all these new strikers.
Difficult to say at this stage after only a few games but .. Harrold seems more adept at holding the ball up and better distribution, and yet Revell seems more capable of heading for a man of his height, and looks like being able to get on the end of crosses.. Revell will get more goals, but probably less likely to contribute overall to others
But we will see..
Irate Ian;59835 and if I were a betting man said:Gambling is a bad game, I don't know anyone who has had a decent win on the gee-gees.
Revell may in time develop. Harold had his chances and failed miserably.
I recall Bill Garner. He was useless in many peoples eyes for his first year at Roots Hall but flourised into an accomplished centre forward and terrorised opponents.
How can anyone judge anyone after a few games.
Not sure about that...Matty effectively didn't lose a header in the last few games he played, and he also seems more adept with the ball at his feet. Harrold's passing ability is grossly underplayed on this board, and as much as I am willing Alex to do well, I honestly can't quantify these statements that he offers more than Harrold from what I have seen thus far.
Absolutely agree. I guess it comes down to whether or not you're seen as a panick. We signed Harrold at the last minute, and people saw it as a just that, and haven't given him a chance.
Personally I thought Revell was rather anonymous yesterday. At least with Harrold you know he's around because he puts himself about. That said, Revel needs to be given time to settle, and i'm sure in time he'll be as good as Harrold.
and haven't given him a chance.
Excuse me while I splutter in my cereal! As good as Harrold? You aren't serious are you?! Yeovil were pleased to see the back of him, whether he was a panic buy or not. Brighton weren't at all pleased to see the back of Revell. That suggests quite definitely that one is a better player than the other.
Revell "put himself about" every bit as much on Saturday as Harrold does and he had the added bonus of actually laying the ball off on more occasions, something Harrold isn't very good at. I know Harrold runs around a lot but if you think he does more than Revell did maybe it's because you notice him more with his hair so he stands out? I don't know, but I really don't agree with what you're saying.
I agree with you most of the time, OBL, but YOU had ME spluttering into my cereal with that one. Harrold's lay offs are often superb, which is why he has so many assists this season. Go back over the Virgin goal highlights and see how many times Harrold has chested, headed or flicked the ball on in the move.
Sorry, we'll have to agree to disagree there. I accept he's had some pretty good assists but IMO he really doesn't get successful lay offs on the majority of headers he wins.
Fair point, it wasn't his headers that I had particularly in mind, though a couple of the goals on virgin do come from his headers - but he tries to bring the ball down under control a lot more than Revell, so he isn't trying flick ons from headers so much. I think that a lot of emotion is invested in Harrold now (from both points of view) but I would love to revisit videos of his matches in a few years time and assess his performances dispassionately - I feel that an independent assessor would be a lot less harsh on Matt than some are at the moment.
He's a striker that hasn't scored in 52 competitive league games... I think that's a little more than what constitutes a fair chance.