Shrimper
Life President
How so? A winding up doesn't mean a deduction from my understandingAnother 10 points gone then
How so? A winding up doesn't mean a deduction from my understandingAnother 10 points gone then
Is that why they won't give consent? Will Ron pay the finance partner back once the council gives planning permission?Martins finance partner is owed 39million.
"it will be a condition of the license to ensure all new or any Football Creditors debts or HMRC debt are cleared on time to the satisfaction of the League at any point during the 2023-2024 season." From the NL statement before the season started.How so? A winding up doesn't mean a deduction from my understanding
This is not football creditors, nor is it HMRC. Should be okay I reckon in terms of any possible action from the league"it will be a condition of the license to ensure all new or any Football Creditors debts or HMRC debt are cleared on time to the satisfaction of the League at any point during the 2023-2024 season." From the NL statement before the season started.
Why would they when they are up to their limit on funding him. Without full planing on the new houses at FF instead of RH i can't see how they would. Trusting The Rat over a deal that is just air atm would be ridiculous.The issue seems to be that CBRE (the rats so called business partner) are not getting back to the consortium in regards to sign off for the RH Land and re development.
Obviously the rat and rat junior said not to panic, but are now also ignoring the consortium and playing their usual game of cat and mouse with everyone around them.
The creditor seems to be the last of our worries, especially with the season nearing completion and the council should do their part but the situation with their finance partner is the one that worries me.
Stewarts Law LLP. Unlikely they are short of a few quid.Depends who they are and their own financial position. It might be that they need that money or they face their own winding up order.
You say that, but the company launching the petition is a legal firm which represented the club in the past in various Winding-Up Petition matters. They argued to a judge on several occasions that the club is a community asset which couldn't be allowed to die, and for the club's creditors to be patient and wait til the sale of the club completed.You can’t exactly blame those wanting to wind us up. They are more than entitled to want their money at this point.
So in a nut shell.Why would they when they are up to their limit on funding him. Without full planing on the new houses at FF instead of RH i can't see how they would. Trusting The Rat over a deal that is just air atm would be ridiculous.
Ah ok so is the debt to them a Martin personal debt or a debt the club has genuinely incurred?You say that, but the company launching the petition is a legal firm which represented the club in the past in various Winding-Up Petition matters. They argued to a judge on several occasions that the club is a community asset which couldn't be allowed to die, and for the club's creditors to be patient and wait til the sale of the club completed.
The irony of this shouldn't be lost on anybody, and it's verging on hypocrisy.
Thank You, Sir.You say that, but the company launching the petition is a legal firm which represented the club in the past in various Winding-Up Petition matters. They argued to a judge on several occasions that the club is a community asset which couldn't be allowed to die, and for the club's creditors to be patient and wait til the sale of the club completed.
The irony of this shouldn't be lost on anybody, and it's verging on hypocrisy.
Disagree. When they're acting on behalf of the club they use the argument that is most likely to help their client.You say that, but the company launching the petition is a legal firm which represented the club in the past in various Winding-Up Petition matters. They argued to a judge on several occasions that the club is a community asset which couldn't be allowed to die, and for the club's creditors to be patient and wait til the sale of the club completed.
The irony of this shouldn't be lost on anybody, and it's verging on hypocrisy.
Backstabbing ****sYou say that, but the company launching the petition is a legal firm which represented the club in the past in various Winding-Up Petition matters. They argued to a judge on several occasions that the club is a community asset which couldn't be allowed to die, and for the club's creditors to be patient and wait til the sale of the club completed.
The irony of this shouldn't be lost on anybody, and it's verging on hypocrisy.
Sadly that's solicitors for you. There'll be one to argue any case if there's promises of money involved, and now they're just arguing their corner in this sorry saga.You say that, but the company launching the petition is a legal firm which represented the club in the past in various Winding-Up Petition matters. They argued to a judge on several occasions that the club is a community asset which couldn't be allowed to die, and for the club's creditors to be patient and wait til the sale of the club completed.
The irony of this shouldn't be lost on anybody, and it's verging on hypocrisy.