Breaking News Jeacock appeal successful

[Yorkshire Blue]

eventually got the red out having been surrounded by Yeovil players. Haven’t seen anything about any action on that? Would it have to be in her report?

Let’s hope not as we can’t afford to have Gus suspended again.

 

[HML]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1855706385771561216

Now this is interesting. Was going to be a yellow before being influenced by players, that has to be sackable?!?

Not to mention surrounding the ref is a bookable offence

 

[Medway Blue]

So the one thing the referee was supposed to have got right she got horribly wrong. It’s worse, as I said before, because I believe she went for the yellow initially and eventually got the red out having been surrounded by Yeovil players. Haven’t seen anything about any action on that? Would it have to be in her report?

Actually I didn’t comment on here about whether a red was correct. I don’t know the rules well enough- but some were adamant she had got it wrong. They were right.

I wonder if Kev will have his red for putting his hands up overturned- or was that a second yellow?

That played a part in appeal evidence too, I think. Was outrageous. She didn't book any Yeovil players for surrounding her either. Madness.

I think it's a simple case of, by the letter of the law, Jeacock didn't deny an obvious goalscoring opportunity, so it should have been a yellow rather than a red.

Maher's was for 2 yellows, so that can't be appealed.

 

[davewebbsbrain]

So the one thing the referee was supposed to have got right she got horribly wrong. It’s worse, as I said before, because I believe she went for the yellow initially and eventually got the red out having been surrounded by Yeovil players. Haven’t seen anything about any action on that? Would it have to be in her report?

Actually I didn’t comment on here about whether a red was correct. I don’t know the rules well enough- but some were adamant she had got it wrong. They were right.

I wonder if Kev will have his red for putting his hands up overturned- or was that a second yellow?

Yeah I mentioned this on the post match thread. The rules of only the captain can appeal to the ref went right out of the window. Yeovil must be brought to book for failing to control their players at that point

 

[tommy tucker]

some fans need to make there minds up .The ficled fans were saying Jecock should not start ahead of Colin In the next breath some as saying colin makes too many mistakes . So who should start colin or Zach . After all Zach did not do any keeper has done a rush of blood to the head .Many keepers have done the same .

 

[kentblues]

That played a part in appeal evidence too, I think. Was outrageous. She didn't book any Yeovil players for surrounding her either. Madness.

I think it's a simple case of, by the letter of the law, Jeacock didn't deny an obvious goalscoring opportunity, so it should have been a yellow rather than a red.

Maher's was for 2 yellows, so that can't be appealed.

Surely she would know the laws (not knowing would be unforgivable). I think she initially made the right decision and then was surrounded and changed it to the wrong decision. Not sure that’s much better.

If you then look at the over reaction and seeming hyper sensitivity to the managers doing anything at all on the touchline it does all rather hint at a lack of confidence

 

[davewebbsbrain]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1855706385771561216

Now this is interesting. Was going to be a yellow before being influenced by players, that has to be sackable?!?

Not to mention surrounding the ref is a bookable offence

Clearly gets the yellow card out then puts it away under pressure from the Yeovil players and gets the red out.
She's not strong enough to ref the mens game

 

[kentblues]

Yeah I mentioned this on the post match thread. The rules of only the captain can appeal to the ref went right out of the window. Yeovil must be brought to book for failing to control their players at that point

I suspect given she changed her decision that didn’t make it into her report…

 

[davewebbsbrain]

I suspect given she changed her decision that didn’t make it into her report…

It's clear to see she got the yellow card out. It's also clear to see the Yeovil players surrounded her, she put the yellow away and got the red out.
I don't care about her report, all the evidence is there to see. The NL needs to act

 

[kentblues]

Clearly gets the yellow card out then puts it away under pressure from the Yeovil players and gets the red out.
She's not strong enough to ref the mens game

Nothing to do with gender. Women can be just as confident and assertive as men and I have seen some good refereeing performances from women referees- and certainly not any more prone to bad performances than the men.

Unfortunately when you ignore gender that fact remains it was by near universal opinion a very poor display and the card being overturned is the cherry on the cake.

 

[Cockle43]

That played a part in appeal evidence too, I think. Was outrageous. She didn't book any Yeovil players for surrounding her either. Madness.

I think it's a simple case of, by the letter of the law, Jeacock didn't deny an obvious goalscoring opportunity, so it should have been a yellow rather than a red.

Maher's was for 2 yellows, so that can't be appealed.

Was Maher's two yellows? About as far away as you can get, at the back of W block, but I only saw a red card not a yellow...

 

[kentblues]

It's clear to see she got the yellow card out. It's also clear to see the Yeovil players surrounded her, she put the yellow away and got the red out.
I don't care about her report, all the evidence is there to see. The NL needs to act

On the last bit don’t hold you breath- especially given the decision being overturned. Taken together it would look really bad and I think there will be an element of keeping up appearances. Not saying there should be but realistically….do you remember Wrexham? We got done for two players going over to the assistant!

 

[Medway Blue]

Was Maher's two yellows? About as far away as you can get, at the back of W block, but I only saw a red card not a yellow...

Yep, he'd already been booked earlier on. Had a feeling then that he'd end up getting a 2nd!

 

[Stuart W]

So she was either intimidated by the Yeovil players into changing her mind, or she didn’t know the correct ruling. Either way she needs to be called out for this, perhaps a three game ban for her.
Oh and that is not being mysogonistic, in fact now we know the outcome, I would say anyone defending her is showing discrimination.
Those lost points at the end of the season could be crucial.

 

[thenobster]

Can we appeal against the 3 points we lost as who knows, he might have saved the fluke shot…. Just saying.

 

[kentblues]

Was Maher's two yellows? About as far away as you can get, at the back of W block, but I only saw a red card not a yellow...

I admit the only card I saw was a red, certainly no showing of a yellow and then a red. We shall see.

 

[davewebbsbrain]

Nothing to do with gender. Women can be just as confident and assertive as men and I have seen some good refereeing performances from women referees- and certainly not any more prone to bad performances than the men.

Unfortunately when you ignore gender that fact remains it was by near universal opinion a very poor display and the card being overturned is the cherry on the cake.

Yeah that's a fair point in that score. Add in the fact sheblew for a foul every time Bim won the ball because of his strength I really do feel she doesn't have the skills required to referee the mens game. She had an absolute mare amd hopefully is kept away for an extended period and is given more training on the mens game, their physical strength etc

 

[Alex]

My initial thought from the south upper when it happened that it was not a red card because I believed it was not deliberate handball. I genuinely believe when he came out he was either trying to block it with his foot or volley it clear but the Yeovil attacker got their first, kicked the ball and it hit Jeacocks arm. If that was an outfield player then a yellow card would have been given, the fact that Jeacock is a keeper should be irrelevant imho because when he is outside the box he should be treated as an outfield player

 

[davewebbsbrain]

On the last bit don’t hold you breath- especially given the decision being overturned. Taken together it would look really bad and I think there will be an element of keeping up appearances. Not saying there should be but realistically….do you remember Wrexham? We got done for two players going over to the assistant!

Yeah Wrexham and the lino changing his mind under pressure from the Wrexham players. We don't have much luck do we

 

[Cockle43]

Yep, he'd already been booked earlier on. Had a feeling then that he'd end up getting a 2nd!

Saw he'd got the first yellow but I didn't see her show him a second yellow followed by the red, I just saw the red come out...