NockyNineDoors votes yes.
Fascinating.
Explanation please.
There are some people worth debating with and some not. I've had this with Wriggy before when it has told me that published accounts are wrong etc after I proved them wrong. There's just no point taking them serious. I think maybe they are as delusional as a certain chairman.
I think we're closer. I think we've been hugely unlucky - the calling in of the plans originally and the global financial crisis scuppered things. I also think the council are more on side now.
When issues such as this thread covers arise it is because sufficient Southend supporters feel very strongly about the future of the club. Of course if any action is taken running costs will need to be covered and that is where those that really want to see some changes will have to put their money where their mouths are. How many will do that, I don't know. All of that said,
Is it unreasonable that genuine supporters want to know what progress there has been made on building a new ground?
Is it unreasonable that supporters want to know what the financial viability of the club is if FF doesn't happen?
Is it unreasonable to know whether there is anything they can help with to achieve progress?
Is it unreasonable to know if there are other approaches that could be taken?
Is it unreasonable to want to know some information rather than nothing at all?
I think all of these things are very reasonable, and that is why threads like these begin life. We may be completely rubbish at organising anything, but doesn't mean that all those concerns arn't genuine.
If BL HAVE pulled out, and we have no planning application, are we closer, or are we back to square one ?
At the very least questions to RM when we are doing the business on the pitch, will show that it's not just a reaction to poor football performances
That said, it has still not been established what the action required is. A couple of concise bullet points will do,
Exactly ! refer to Page 8 on the thread below. What are your thoughts ?
http://www.shrimperzone.com/vb/showthread.php?87266-New-stadium-or-Dome-Discussion/page8
There was a suggestion of a tongue in cheek dig at our leader, with notification to the media of what it means. Obviously, if this, or the next steps, do not work then we've have to try other options. I don't think it would right to discuss these on an open forum, mind.
There was a suggestion of a tongue in cheek dig at our leader, with notification to the media of what it means. Obviously, if this, or the next steps, do not work then we've have to try other options. I don't think it would right to discuss these on an open forum, mind.
I am sure you can discuss what you want done , by either RM or others. Sure , how it will be achieved may be a bit more sensitive, but considering that RM keeping those things "under his hat" is one of the major criticisms of him, I am sure you would not want to do the same.
Don't think Ron cares, if he had the money he would build it today regardless. We aren't going to provide him with the millions he needs to finance it.Remember everyone waving flags at RH supporting the move ? Remember people marching down to the council offices supporting the move ? Remember being asked to view the BL designs ?
He'll get NIMBY's complaining anyway. What he needs is the fans support to carry it through. Perhaps we should make it clear he hasn't got our support anymore....unless he starts explaining exactly how this grand plan will benefit SUFC !
Any action, like you suggested, that goes on during the game will have a detrimental effect on the players, and as such would not get my support, and I would be surprised and disappointed if TBV supported this.
Don't think Ron cares, if he had the money he would build it today regardless. We aren't going to provide him with the millions he needs to finance it.
I am sure you can discuss what you want done , by either RM or others. Sure , how it will be achieved may be a bit more sensitive, but considering that RM keeping those things "under his hat" is one of the major criticisms of him, I am sure you would not want to do the same.