I'd imagine if you owed someone money and you had the means to pay it, but those means were built in with high interest you'd wait until the last possible moment to draw down on it.So if its agreed, is Ron waiting until the last minute (so to speak) to draw it down for the reasons that have spoken of before?
I remember people saying that on here too. Just shows you it's not just 'pessimistic' rumours that should be dismissed out of hand.It is all very strange … I heard by a really reliable friend that works in this big company that has agreed this bridging loan it was signed off and a deal done in November….
Quite probably. I struggle to understand why that can't be communicated though. Still ****, and **** for the people waiting to be paid especially, but at least gives some hope that we will make it beyond the end of the month. Then we can turn attention to getting him to commit to a succession/exit plan and timetable.So if its agreed, is Ron waiting until the last minute (so to speak) to draw it down for the reasons that have spoken of before?
It is all very strange … I heard by a really reliable friend that works in this big company that has agreed this bridging loan it was signed off and a deal done in November….
Yeah, it is strange. I had heard (not sure how true) that it had been agreed on the side of the lender but that Martin was waiting to sign-off on it as he had other irons in the fire (external investment for a slice of the pie, etc.), but I was under the impression that these were recent developments. If the loan had been agreed on the side of the lender as far back as November then that opens up a whole other can of worms and poses another list of questions that will probably never be answered truthfully and transparently.It is all very strange … I heard by a really reliable friend that works in this big company that has agreed this bridging loan it was signed off and a deal done in November….
He owes money to all three Directors. I can understand them not being willing to lend him any more.As others have said, the debt to St John’s is peanuts to some of the people involved with the club. Why no one has paid that is beyond me..
I heard that it was approved 'in principle' with the o/s issue regarding the valuation of the collateral it was secured against to be agreedand yet, I've heard very recently the exact opposite from someone reliable.
I believe that Tara Brady was able to recover what he had lent the narcissist but only just before that went to court.He owes money to all three Directors. I can understand them not being willing to lend him any more.
Tara loved this club and the fans (who he mixed with frequently) he just wasn't prepared to put up with RM's ways anymore. Yes he eventually got his money back. He is a big cheese at Microsoft these days.I believe that Tara Brady was able to recover what he had lent the narcissist but only just before that went to court.
I guess he had little or no affiliation with the Club.
The rumour I heard that the difference was that it was a personal loan directly to RM and not one of his myriad of companies.Tara loved this club and the fans (who he mixed with frequently) he just wasn't prepared to put up with RM's ways anymore. Yes he eventually got his money back. He is a big cheese at Microsoft these days.
We might not not have a team leftHeard earlier on the radio a staff member at the club is seeking possible legal action over the non payment of wages, so guessing some staff members have finally had enough!
A land deal was held up due to planning refusal- resubmitted/appealed but he is looking to sell to developer at a discount now (or was). Also talk of an "investor"....personally given nonpayment of wages, St. Johns et al I think the other irons scenario is now more likely with the loan as a back stop. Generating all this pain just to avoid a months interest is I think unlikely..Yeah, it is strange. I had heard (not sure how true) that it had been agreed on the side of the lender but that Martin was waiting to sign-off on it as he had other irons in the fire (external investment for a slice of the pie, etc.), but I was under the impression that these were recent developments. If the loan had been agreed on the side of the lender as far back as November then that opens up a whole other can of worms and poses another list of questions that will probably never be answered truthfully and transparently.
True, although don't forget it's not pain for Ron Martin. He is a sociopath, he doesn't give a monkeys about anyone else.A land deal was held up due to planning refusal- resubmitted/appealed but he is looking to sell to developer at a discount now (or was). Also talk of an "investor"....personally given nonpayment of wages, St. Johns et al I think the other irons scenario is now more likely with the loan as a back stop. Generating all this pain just to avoid a months interest is I think unlikely..
Yep, sounds the most rational explanation. Do you know the exact location of the land by any chance ?A land deal was held up due to planning refusal- resubmitted/appealed but he is looking to sell to developer at a discount now (or was). Also talk of an "investor"....personally given nonpayment of wages, St. Johns et al I think the other irons scenario is now more likely with the loan as a back stop. Generating all this pain just to avoid a months interest is I think unlikely..
It's only a matter of time, I'm surprised it taken this long. Its certainly a case of unfair dismissal, and the courts take a dim view of these things.Heard earlier on the radio a staff member at the club is seeking possible legal action over the non payment of wages, so guessing some staff members have finally had enough!
No..Yep, sounds the most rational explanation. Do you know the exact location of the land by any chance ?