get out there and vote

[C'mon you Shrimpers]

See UKIP have been getting in trouble again.Oh dear.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...stigation-racist-homophobic-facebook-comments

Also see that:-"the BBC's projected national share figure showed Ukip got less than the 23% it had in council elections last year. Moreover, the party does not control any local authorities."

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics...ed national share of the vote is down on 2012

I think Labour supporters should be more worried about getting a coherent economic policy sorted out or they don't stand a chance in hell of getting back in.

 

[Tangled up in Blue]

I think Labour supporters should be more worried about getting a coherent economic policy sorted out or they don't stand a chance in hell of getting back in.

Perhaps you could explain what exactly is so incoherent about the economic policy ideas mentioned here?

http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...conomic-policy-industrial-revolution-required

 

[slapheadsteve]

Expect a lot more of this at next year's general election.

Being a Libreal suppose i cant complain!!

 

[McNasty]

Being a Libreal suppose i cant complain!!

You told me you were a Lesbian because you like women.

 

[Benfleet A1]

Perhaps you could ask a question without adding a tedious Guardian link. We all know you will join any old witch hunt at anything as long as it isn't related to the Labour party yet duck anything that questions them and their flawed polices.

Bacon sandwich anyone?

 

[Another Surrey Shrimper]

I think Labour supporters should be more worried about getting a coherent economic policy sorted out or they don't stand a chance in hell of getting back in.

Although if we are in an era of 4 party politics - what is UKIP's economic policy?

 

[Tangled up in Blue]

Perhaps you could ask a question without adding a tedious Guardian link. We all know you will join any old witch hunt at anything as long as it isn't related to the Labour party yet duck anything that questions them and their flawed polices.

Bacon sandwich anyone?

What question would you like me to ask, GHG? :winking:

 

[slapheadsteve]

You told me you were a Lesbian because you like women.

A libreal lesbian wearing speedo's. Ha Ha

 

[Benfleet A1]

What question would you like me to ask, GHG? :winking:

Without falling back on your usual source of disinformation I seriously doubt you will be able to manage it.

 

[C'mon you Shrimpers]

Perhaps you could explain what exactly is so incoherent about the economic policy ideas mentioned here?

http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...conomic-policy-industrial-revolution-required

well I read it. Did not get your point. Muddled thinking IMHO. Jump on any old bandwagon sprang to mind. Maybe it's me but I think not.

 

[londonblue]

Oh God,mummys little solder didn't get what he wanted.

I think you'll find that UKIP are now is a state of flux.

:hilarious:

 

[Shrimper]

Nick Robinson ‏@bbcnickrobinson May 23
UKIP not party of power yet but are party with power to disrupt. BBC National Vote Share - Lab 29%, Con 25%, UKIP 23% & Lib Dems 14%.

Didn't expect them to be just two points behind Tories. Of course that doesn't really mean much at this stage. Also, need to see who was right in predicting the %.

 

[Benfleet A1]

It does matter. What matters is the gap between labour and the tories. According to these stats it's four points which is no where near enough for a working majority for labour to form a government. They will have to offer up a pact with the libdems but they could be wiped out completely after their showing in the last few days.

 

[Swiss Tony]

I think you'll find that UKIP are now is a state of flux.

:hilarious:

Is that all you've got,Christ on a bike.

 

[C'mon you Shrimpers]

Although if we are in an era of 4 party politics - what is UKIP's economic policy?

You've made my point. Labour need to look to themselves not UKIP. The sad answer is Labour have nothing to offer by way of economic policy but a return to the failed past orthodoxy.

 

[Tangled up in Blue]

It does matter. What matters is the gap between labour and the tories. According to these stats it's four points which is no where near enough for a working majority for labour to form a government. They will have to offer up a pact with the libdems but they could be wiped out completely after their showing in the last few days.

FYI,the Lib/Dems are widely expected to hang on to about forty of their seats in the next G/E.

That would be more than enough for them to "offer up a pact" with Labour

 

[Benfleet A1]

On the present polls and personal ratings of both Beaker and Clegg that could be highly unlikely. The man can't even eat a bacon sandwich without cocking it up.

 

[Tangled up in Blue]

On the present polls and personal ratings of both Beaker and Clegg that could be highly unlikely. The man can't even eat a bacon sandwich without cocking it up.

View attachment 2697

You clearly don't get it .

There will be a binary decsion for the British people to make at next year's election.

But it won't be between UKIP and Labour.

It'll be between the Tories and Labour.

Vote UIP at the G/E and you'll put Labour in power nationally.


http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...kip-will-make-Ed-Miliband-Prime-Minister.html

 

[Shrimpers are Magic]

FYI,the Lib/Dems are widely expected to hang on to about forty of their seats in the next G/E.

That would be more than enough for them to "offer up a pact" with Labour

Not even the slime that is Nick Clegg would walk away from the present coalition only to form one with Miliband. I would be utterly amazed if this happened. Labour will still be in opposition and looking for a new leader.

 

[Tangled up in Blue]

Not even the slime that is Nick Clegg would walk away from the present coalition only to form one with Miliband. I would be utterly amazed if this happened. Labour will still be in opposition and looking for a new leader.

I doubt if anyone on the Labour front benches would be prepared to work with Clegg, anyway.

In any case, he'll obviously step down after the G/E.