MK Shrimper
Striker
Yeah I'm rather looking forward to seeing Hugh Grant playing a mockney hard man after seeing the trailer.Btw,did I ever tell you my old man was a real ****ney?
So was mine, born into the Bow slums in 1925.
Yeah I'm rather looking forward to seeing Hugh Grant playing a mockney hard man after seeing the trailer.Btw,did I ever tell you my old man was a real ****ney?
must admit when I saw it at the cinema it was really noticeable that literally no one got up to go to the loo, people didn’t talk, people didn’t even fidget/ change poisons in their seat.I totally and utterly disagree. Despite being set in WW1 it's not a war film as such. IMHO it is absolutely stunning on every level and I've never been in a cinema where the audience (and there were a lot or varying ages) where deathly silent when the film ended. It affected me on a level that films very rarely do.
I can't wait to see Parasite (it was a date night toss-up) but it'll have to go some to beat 1917.
must admit when I saw it at the cinema it was really noticeable that literally no one got up to go to the loo, people didn’t talk, people didn’t even fidget/ change poisons in their seat.
For the very final scene I thought to myself “ this makes no sense, what’s going to happen in the last 40 mins”. I had been totally absorbed and thought I had only been sitting down for 90 mins.
Would like to see it again, but I get why people have different views.
I love war films and it’s not in my top 5.
But if I was marking it from an artistic viewpoint I would have a different view.
You see, I'm not really a war film fan. I've been recommended to watch Paths of Glory which I shall but I really can't gush anymore about 1917- I found it moving on so many levels.
must admit when I saw it at the cinema it was really noticeable that literally no one got up to go to the loo, people didn’t talk, people didn’t even fidget/ change poisons in their seat.
For the very final scene I thought to myself “ this makes no sense, what’s going to happen in the last 40 mins”. I had been totally absorbed and thought I had only been sitting down for 90 mins.
Would like to see it again, but I get why people have different views.
I love war films and it’s not in my top 5.
But if I was marking it from an artistic viewpoint I would have a different view.
Paths of Glory is a masterpiece. No false heroics, no stirring music, grainy black and white photography giving it a documentary feel and a fitting memorial to Kirk Douglas, who was instrumental in getting the film made when none of the big studios wanted to touch it.You see, I'm not really a war film fan. I've been recommended to watch Paths of Glory which I shall but I really can't gush anymore about 1917- I found it moving on so many levels.
1917 was massively overrated.
Parasite on the other hand wasn’t. Absolutely amazing
You see, I'm not really a war film fan. I've been recommended to watch Paths of Glory which I shall but I really can't gush anymore about 1917- I found it moving on so many levels.
I have to agree on 1917, the way it was talked up I was expecting much more.
Haven’t seen Parasite, might have to give that one a go. Don’t even know what it’s about.
Not all films suit everyone's taste. I really enjoyed it.Saw most of A Beautiful Day in the neighbourhood before giving it the heave ho. It's incredibly dull, Hanks is just plain creepy. How it's good such good reviews is beyond me.
Saw most of A Beautiful Day in the neighbourhood before giving it the heave ho. It's incredibly dull, Hanks is just plain creepy. How it's good such good reviews is beyond me.