graysblue
Banned
You know, I'm really beginning to lose patience with this. I'll try one more time to explain it, then i'll just give up.
I'm not arguing either side of the drivers arguement, I'm arguing that the statistics are incomplete and one sided.
I'll give one more analogy as an example.
take the equation x = 4+y
what does x equal? You don't know, because you don't know what y equals.
Do you need to know what y equals to know that this equation doesn't contain enough information? Of course you don't.
The statistics you've given us are similar to this equation, and you're telling us what x equals. I'm merely saying that there is insufficient data top draw an analysis. I don't need to provide that data to prove that point, just show the hole where it would be.
Put simply, if I was debunking your views, I'd need to supply data. I'm merely debunking your data, and as such have just to show that data's missing (which I already have several times)
I hope this clears it up for you
you sir have accused me of being blinkered,bitter and your losing patience.
i have posted stats from reputable sources,you and others have shot those stats down without disproving them.
no one put a gun to your head to reply to this thread.
i hope this clears things up.