Cockle43
Manager⭐🦐
The documents make interesting reading and to be perfectly honest had I been a councillor in that meeting today I don't think I could have taken any other decision than to defer the application.
Basically Savills, for SUFC, are arguing that Southend Town Centre retail space is over trading the national average per sq metre by a fair percentage and therefore the impact of additional retail space at the new development would have less impact than assessed previously back in 2009. They assess that the impact on Southend Town Centre would be in the region of 3% therefore the S106 contribution should be reduced accordingly.
GL Hearn, for SBC, argue that they have had very little time to look at the figures as the applicant is exerting pressure on the Council as they want an early resolution, from that you could read that SUFC/Sainsbury are keen to get on with it. They argue that the original figures would still hold water but acknowledge that they are working from old figures whereas Savills appear to have done a bit more homework, they argue that the impact on Southend Town Centre would be in the region of pushing 7%.
I can't see that any planning officer or councillor would be happy making conclusions at this time so basically they've sent the two off to agree their figures and come back in 3 months with something much more concrete.
At the moment Savills are offering £2.25m as opposed to the original £6.6m so obviously there are serious stakes to be played for. I fully expect them to come back to Council with a revised figure as SBC will not want to see a Judicial Review as if they lose they will have to pay all the costs and will rarely go against their officers' recommendation. Would suggest that there's going to be a whole lot of horse-trading going on in the next couple of months...... I hope....
Basically Savills, for SUFC, are arguing that Southend Town Centre retail space is over trading the national average per sq metre by a fair percentage and therefore the impact of additional retail space at the new development would have less impact than assessed previously back in 2009. They assess that the impact on Southend Town Centre would be in the region of 3% therefore the S106 contribution should be reduced accordingly.
GL Hearn, for SBC, argue that they have had very little time to look at the figures as the applicant is exerting pressure on the Council as they want an early resolution, from that you could read that SUFC/Sainsbury are keen to get on with it. They argue that the original figures would still hold water but acknowledge that they are working from old figures whereas Savills appear to have done a bit more homework, they argue that the impact on Southend Town Centre would be in the region of pushing 7%.
I can't see that any planning officer or councillor would be happy making conclusions at this time so basically they've sent the two off to agree their figures and come back in 3 months with something much more concrete.
At the moment Savills are offering £2.25m as opposed to the original £6.6m so obviously there are serious stakes to be played for. I fully expect them to come back to Council with a revised figure as SBC will not want to see a Judicial Review as if they lose they will have to pay all the costs and will rarely go against their officers' recommendation. Would suggest that there's going to be a whole lot of horse-trading going on in the next couple of months...... I hope....