fair point. totally agree it is a good ratio. but surely someone of his calibre would be banging more goals at this level?Five goals in 11 games is a very decent ratio and better than anyone else at the club.
fair point. totally agree it is a good ratio. but surely someone of his calibre would be banging more goals at this level?Five goals in 11 games is a very decent ratio and better than anyone else at the club.
If we still had the likes of Sawyer and Robson-Kanu I think Freedman probably would score more because they would be able to pick out his runs more effectively. Unfortunately at the moment we don't have any genuine wide players who can consistently get crosses in for our strikers and no-one of real quality in the centre of the park.fair point. totally agree it is a good ratio. but surely someone of his calibre would be banging more goals at this level?
fair point. totally agree it is a good ratio. but surely someone of his calibre would be banging more goals at this level?
fair point. totally agree it is a good ratio. but surely someone of his calibre would be banging more goals at this level?
so? does it matter if it gets to 400 pages? in my book that makes a good debate and that's what this forum is all about. it's got to be far better than 3 pages of everyone agreeing on 1 topic. or is it a case of your point is across and that should be then end of it? if you don't want to read it, no-one is forcing youWe had this exact same thread last week that got to 8 pages, now we have this one thats got to 7 pages. I'm staggered at this, I really am.
.
so? does it matter if it gets to 400 pages? in my book that makes a good debate and that's what this forum is all about. it's got to be far better than 3 pages of everyone agreeing on 1 topic. or is it a case of your point is across and that should be then end of it? if you don't want to read it, no-one is forcing you
Let's face it. If Fernando Torres came to us on loan for the rest of the season he'd score no more than 5-10 goals in 15 games, not 30 goals in 15 just because he's a world class player.
One man does not make a team, Dougie is a great player with a proven track record but please remember the guy isn't playing against pub team defences, these are defences who are going to up their game as a proven natural goalscorer is up against them. Maybe he shouldn't go about shouting his head off at players as much, but he's doing the job that he's been asked to do. If Tilson disagreed then he'd stop doing it, it's not as if he's a law unto himself (well you'd hope not anyway).
he is amazingly crap!!;) just kidding. i just don't understand why people see his positives but none of his negatives! honestly i DO think he can offer us something but not for 90 minutes and his attitude has to change! he has no god given right to berate other players, i'm all for encouragement, but i think certain players i.e. francis have been effected by him at certain times in matchesI think this is the correct statement you have made in the thread ;) Now admit Dougie is amazing.
exactly. so why play the guy for nearly 90 mins, when surely he would be more effective in the last quarter. as you said they will up their game. so maybe if they came up against 2 unknown strikers i.e. laurent and robbo, they would underestimate them? just like many people said this happened with freddy. in league 2 and league 1 no-one REALLY knew what to expect. but when he's played in the CCC defenders of better quality know his game and keep him in check. i don't neccessarily agree with this though.
he is amazingly crap!!;) just kidding. i just don't understand why people see his positives but none of his negatives! honestly i DO think he can offer us something but not for 90 minutes and his attitude has to change! he has no god given right to berate other players, i'm all for encouragement, but i think certain players i.e. francis have been effected by him at certain times in matches
exactly!!!! it's not the first time he's done this but here's a perfect example. against crewe, just in front of the black seats in the east, freedman had a shocking first touch, tried to regain control, then made a hash of that and the ball rolled out for a throw-in, why was he not given the same treatment as francis? is it;I think the crowd are doing more to get at Franno than than that one man. Oh when he gave the ball away on Tuesday I think the area of the west where I was sitting got more animated than when we scored!
so? does it matter if it gets to 400 pages? in my book that makes a good debate and that's what this forum is all about. it's got to be far better than 3 pages of everyone agreeing on 1 topic. or is it a case of your point is across and that should be then end of it? if you don't want to read it, no-one is forcing you
exactly!!!! it's not the first time he's done this but here's a perfect example. against crewe, just in front of the black seats in the east, freedman had a shocking first touch, tried to regain control, then made a hash of that and the ball rolled out for a throw-in, why was he not given the same treatment as francis? is it;
a) no-one wants to acknowledge his faults
b) the 23-year old making his way in the game deserved to get ripped apart more than an experienced pro
c)it wasn't dougies fault, the glare from the floodlight got in his eye
weel done. good input. so what should i do now? agree because everyone else does? maybe i should put on something made of wool and go around saying BAAAH BAAAH.We do all agree, its just you that disagrees (oh and one other person now).
:)
this, unlike some responses on here is very good. no condecending, no personal jibes, no your wrong im right, just a sensible response.d) the fact that Francis has been doing this kind of thing constantly the whole season. I am sure if Freedman did that non stop all the time then people would get on his back to.
d) the fact that Francis has been doing this kind of thing constantly the whole season. I am sure if Freedman did that non stop all the time then people would get on his back to.
Can only concur here, Mildenhall for example is now getting praise as he's really upped his game, Francis hasn't. Dougie's giving those around him thoughts and ideas, if someone wants to throw their toys out of their pram cos they're being told how to do something better on the pitch then that's their fault, we're lucky, we've got two great motivators playing in the team, one who would practically walk through bullets for the club they cherish leading from the back and another who is coming to the end of their career and wants to help a club that they see has some sort of promise and wants to be able to say that he helped be a catalyst for it and move on to something when their career is over with this on their CV. The way the guy conducts himself here in a more senior role could shape whether he has a career in football when he hangs up his boots or if he needs to pursue something elsewhere.
Personally I think once we're mathematically safe it's time to rest the players like Freedman, Laurent et al who have been slightly injured and give some of the kids a chance with nothing to play for, let's see what they can do and give people like Freedman the chance to show these kids just what his experience can give them...
(This based on the assumption that we're not in the play offs)
Also Theo's probably getting better coaching here than at Watford thanks to Dougie and that's worth him going out on loan on it's own.