Boreham Shrimper
President
GET IN!!!!
No problem, kiddo ...[b said:Quote[/b] (mattlovell6 @ Nov. 04 2006,17:19)]Not sure I asked exactly but thanks for the update all the same Mr Armstrong
No they didn't rise so quickly but while I respect your opinion IMHO the speed of our rise means nothing in relation to comparison with Col U - at the end of the day regardless of where we came from we still finished 6pts above them last season.[b said:Quote[/b] (Xàbia Shrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:15)]But, the argument goes, they didn't rise so quickly up the Football League. They spent a few seasons in 'consolidation' in Division Two / League One before rising to this level. Therefore a fair proportion of their players are not quite as out of their depth as some of ours clearly are. Maybe ...[b said:Quote[/b] (Angell Delight @ Nov. 04 2006,17:11)]... look at Col U, their squad is a similar squad to us and they're doing extremely well ...
... in a very weak league, as I suggested in the summer. We got lucky ...[b said:Quote[/b] (Angell Delight @ Nov. 04 2006,17:27)]... at the end of the day regardless of where we came from we still finished 6pts above [Col******r] last season ...
I saw Kem Izzet play against us at Layer Road last season and he was barely a football league player.[b said:Quote[/b] (Angell Delight @ Nov. 04 2006,16:27)]No they didn't rise so quickly but while I respect your opinion IMHO the speed of our rise means nothing in relation to comparison with Col U - at the end of the day regardless of where we came from we still finished 6pts above them last season.[b said:Quote[/b] (Xàbia Shrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:15)]But, the argument goes, they didn't rise so quickly up the Football League. They spent a few seasons in 'consolidation' in Division Two / League One before rising to this level. Therefore a fair proportion of their players are not quite as out of their depth as some of ours clearly are. Maybe ...[b said:Quote[/b] (Angell Delight @ Nov. 04 2006,17:11)]... look at Col U, their squad is a similar squad to us and they're doing extremely well ...
I personally reckon the many more players in their squad with Championship experience compared to us plays a major part in how much better they've adapted to this division.
I think with the Digital Rights Management system that has now been implemented by PremiumTV, it is no longer possible to do that SS.[b said:Quote[/b] (Spaceman Spiff @ Nov. 04 2006,16:22)]ANYONE GOT A LINK TO COMMENTARY PLEASE?
Thanks
PM sent SS[b said:Quote[/b] (Shrimp in a Kilt @ Nov. 04 2006,16:29)]I think with the Digital Rights Management system that has now been implemented by PremiumTV, it is no longer possible to do that SS.[b said:Quote[/b] (Spaceman Spiff @ Nov. 04 2006,16:22)]ANYONE GOT A LINK TO COMMENTARY PLEASE?
Thanks
Thanks mate[b said:Quote[/b] (swanseashrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:30)]PM sent SS[b said:Quote[/b] (Shrimp in a Kilt @ Nov. 04 2006,16:29)]I think with the Digital Rights Management system that has now been implemented by PremiumTV, it is no longer possible to do that SS.[b said:Quote[/b] (Spaceman Spiff @ Nov. 04 2006,16:22)]ANYONE GOT A LINK TO COMMENTARY PLEASE?
Thanks
It wasn't a weak league. Thats b******s.[b said:Quote[/b] (Xàbia Shrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:29)]... in a very weak league, as I suggested in the summer. We got lucky ...[b said:Quote[/b] (Angell Delight @ Nov. 04 2006,17:27)]... at the end of the day regardless of where we came from we still finished 6pts above [Col******r] last season ...
I agree the division was weak(ish) but the fact still remains that we won it - 6pts ahead of Col U and a lot more than Barnsley so there's obviously some major difference between us and Col U......[b said:Quote[/b] (Xàbia Shrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:29)]... in a very weak league, as I suggested in the summer. We got lucky ...[b said:Quote[/b] (Angell Delight @ Nov. 04 2006,17:27)]... at the end of the day regardless of where we came from we still finished 6pts above [Col******r] last season ...
It was. In my opinion. The gao between top and bottom was closer than it has been for some time ... that's indicative of a weak league, no?[b said:Quote[/b] (Beefy @ Nov. 04 2006,17:39)]It wasn't a weak league. Thats b******s.
or it could be a strong league, with even the weaker sides not far behind?[b said:Quote[/b] (Xàbia Shrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:45)]It was. In my opinion. The gao between top and bottom was closer than it has been for some time ... that's indicative of a weak league, no?[b said:Quote[/b] (Beefy @ Nov. 04 2006,17:39)]It wasn't a weak league. Thats b******s.
Either way I think it would be difficult to tell without going to a few games[b said:Quote[/b] (swanseashrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:48)]or it could be a strong league, with even the weaker sides not far behind?[b said:Quote[/b] (Xàbia Shrimper @ Nov. 04 2006,16:45)]It was. In my opinion. The gao between top and bottom was closer than it has been for some time ... that's indicative of a weak league, no?[b said:Quote[/b] (Beefy @ Nov. 04 2006,17:39)]It wasn't a weak league. Thats b******s.