Quote[/b] (swanseashrimper @ Sep. 27 2006,16:50)]Elvis, you're spectacularly missing the point I feel.
We all want Southend to win every game. However, we also realise that their's next to no chance of hat happening.
What we're saying is, it's better to set a tough, but achievable target, then to set one that's nigh on impossible. Think about it, you're back at school, and have been told that you need to have an essay written by the end of the week, else you'll fail. Tough maybe, but you've a week to get it done, so it's possible if you work at it. now think about the sam situation, you're told you've got to have the essay written by home time else you'll fail.It's not possible is it? you know you'll never do it, so you know you'll fail, so why even bother trying? Ok, that may seem lazy, but that's the human psyche for you.
Last season, Tilly set the target of staying up, and then once we'd reached the magic figure, the next target was to push on too promotion. It worked! If he'd said promotion from the start, would it still have resulted in us champions?
Had tilly set a target of 80+ points from the off, the danger is some would look at how far there was to go, and panic. By splitting the season into sections (first 51 points, then promotion) it didn't seem quite so daunting.
Conclusion? Attainable targets are good, unrealistic targets are intimidating and counter productive.