Rusty Shackleford
Banned
wow, that is mad. Why are West Ham so low
Because they suck donkey balls in hell?
wow, that is mad. Why are West Ham so low
wow, that is mad. Why are West Ham so low
Because they generally finish in the bottom half of the table!
Certainly in the 3 points for a win days....
In the weighted figures, where all wins get 3 points regardless of when they were, they are 22 places higher at 42nd
Shame about the next year.:p
True That was no mean feat and is actually higher than we have ever finished . Our best being 12th . However , if you take the best 5 ever finishes we have 5 in the 2nd Tier (between 18 and 12) as well as 22nd and a 24th,
Add to that two championships, an 86 year uninterupted league status and a record attendance of over 31,033 .
When compared to 2 years in the 2nd tier , no Football league trophies , entry into the league 27 years after Southend , 2 years in the conference and a record attendance 19,072 , I think we shade the bragging rights on statistics .
Colchester are on a bit of a high at the moment, currently going through what is arguably, their best few years in their history. Bearing in mind that when We were "peaking" there was 4 divisions difference between the sides I personally don't feel it is anything particular to crow about and believe that the status quo will be resumed once the West Ham supporting "rural Abramovich wannabee" runs out of money and Col U once again have to rely on their supporters putting bums on seats and hands in pockets to meet the bills, the way a large number of other clubs (including ours) have to operate
Form is temporary, Class is permanent
Cheers guys, after a rough 1st post this turned into a very interesting statto like thread, bring on the game thats where our rivalry really kicks in.
talk about being a brown nose! scum
His post was quite good actually...FAO DWB:i dont know what your reply to my post said,because you are firmly on my ignore list(thank heavens for the ignore list so i dont have to put up with post from people like u?)
however YOU WAS THE 1 who decided maybe we should ignore each other as i quite clearly dont like u and feel the feelings mutal.GOOD
so why reply to my posts?
do u know what ignore means?
i suggest you place me on your ignore list......
because i certainly do not like you.
Now, now, gentlemen. We all sing from the same hymn sheet, so have a horlicks and chill out?.
His post was quite good actually...
Now, now, gentlemen. We all sing from the same hymn sheet, so have a horlicks and chill out?.
FAO DWB:i dont know what your reply to my post said,because you are firmly on my ignore list(thank heavens for the ignore list so i dont have to put up with post from people like u?)
however YOU WAS THE 1 who decided maybe we should ignore each other as i quite clearly dont like u and feel the feelings mutal.GOOD
so why reply to my posts?
do u know what ignore means?
i suggest you place me on your ignore list......
because i certainly do not like you.
Nicely put Steveo!So if he is on your ignore list, why are you replying to his post? Surely if you want to ignore him you should just ignore him.
So if he is on your ignore list, why are you replying to his post? Surely if you want to ignore him you should just ignore him.
i havent read his post but always has his hidden posts under everything i post,getting on my nerves.
i will from now on be ignoring him as it was his suggestion a couple of weeks a go maybe he should do the same?
i suggest your his friend so maybe you should ask your friend the full story?
Im not his friend, I dont know the bloke, but he is a regular poster on here and makes a worthwhile contribution but as he doesn't always agree with you I suppose that makes him scum.