• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

SUFC: The Future SUFC up for sale

Status
Not open for further replies.

huddersfield get the yankee dollar
Great: "reported that Hoyle will write off £40m as part of the deal in order to keep the Terriers out of administration, which would have led to the club receiving a 12-point deduction and almost certainly consigned them to relegation." Wonder if Ronnie will do similar.

Good: North American money. They will probably be well-financed.

Questionable: their intentions.

Not good: Faceless at the moment, and will be so until the takeover is complete. Feels a bit shady.
 
Today's Price of Football Podcast is quite interesting, as it covers your club and some of the key players at the organisation that is preparing it for sale. Specifically, Andy Appleby used to own Derby (and Kieran Maguire said he thought it was him who sold the club to Mel Morris).

He also mentions Jez Moxey, who has had involvement with a few clubs and Maguire says he is still a Director of the EFL. He (Maguire) expressed some unease about the potential conflicts of interest here, in terms of Moxey's potential access to EFL data and other sensitive information.

I'd have thought that more to the point would be him having a role at a club that still has aspirations to be an EFL club next season, but the conflicts may be more potential than actual.

Starts about 39 minutes from the end.

 
Not from BVI companies house but a credit report.

I'll copy it here

MEZCAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED 1002652

Business Name MEZCAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Country VIRGIN ISLANDS, BRITISH
Company Registration Number 1002652
Main Activity Code 7022
Main Activity Description Business and other management consultancy activities
Company Status Active (Active)
Latest Turnover Figure -
Latest Shareholder Equity Figure -
Common Credit Rating C
Common Rating Description Moderate Risk
Credit Limit 100.000 USD
Provider Credit Rating 11/20
Provider Rating Description Moderate Risk
Basic Information
Business Name MEZCAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Registered Company Name MEZCAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Company Registration Number 1002652
Country VIRGIN ISLANDS, BRITISH
VAT Registration Number
VAT Registration Date
Date of Company Registration 2006-01-03
Date of Starting Operations
Commercial Court
Legal Form International Business Company
Type of Ownership
Company Status Active (Active)
Principal Activity Code 7022
Principal Activity Description Business and other management consultancy activities
Contact Telephone Number +1-2844948184
Main Address
Address Country Telephone
C/O: Vistra (BVI) Limited Vistra Corporate Services Centre Wickhams Cay II,
Road Town, Tortola, VG1110
VIRGIN ISLANDS, BRITISH +1-2844948184
11//20
Credit rating: C
Number of Employees 0
Banker Information
Banker Name Banker Address Phone Number
HSBC British Virgin Islands
Advisors Information
No advisor information for this company.
Miscellaneous Information
Fax Number +1-2844945132
Export Countries
Import Countries
Additional Business Information MEZCAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED, is an International Business Company / Offshore Company incorporated in
the British Virgin Islands for tax purposes. However the company does not carry any operation in the
British Virgin Islands.
LINE OF BUSINESS : Finance and investment. Subject has the following purposes and
objects: The principal object is to engage either in the Virgin Islands or abroad, in the purchase, sell, disposal, dealing, transfer, barter, ownership, negotiate, finance, administration to grant guaranties in favor of obligation of third parties with or without mortgage or pledge of the corporation assets, give or borrowing money in loan, giving or taking in commission, mortgage, security, lease, use, usufruct, or receivership, any kind of property, whether real or personal stock or rights, and make and accept all kinds
of deals, contracts, operations, business and transactions of lawful commerce. The corporation could engage also in fulfilling all activities, contracts, operations, business or transactions allowed by Law to the Corporation. In particular it is engaged in financial intermediation operations, participation in overseas companies, shareholdings, overseas investments in general, etc. According to informed by subject\'s resident agent, it is legally registered in the British Virgin Islands, with head offices abroad. It means that
subject uses the British Virgin Islands territory only as its legal and administrative address, but all its operations are carried out abroad. It is under the same condition as many companies that are established in the British Virgin Islands, founded in order to protect their shareholder\'s investments and, to avail of tax exemption laws in that country. Subject\'s annual business volume is not disclosed by its Resident Agent.

Additional Rating Information Comments on the rating: A credit line may be considered.
Additional Payment Information
Additional Financial Information
Number of Employees at Address 0
Number of Employees at Group
Number of Employees at Factory
2/8
Additional Miscellaneous Information
Operation Status Not confirmed
Creation Date 2006; The supplier could get only information on year, not month and day at this time.”
Comments on data supplied Please find the correct legal address for the company. Telephone Provided +447710551445 could not be verified.
Registration Type Registration Number
Foreign/Domestic Domestic
Last Annual Report Date 2022-10-31
Mailing C/O: Vistra (BVI) Limited Vistra Corporate Services Centre Wickhams Cay II, Road Town, Tortola, VG1110, British Virgin Islands
SIC Codes 6719
Size Range Small
Comments on staff The subject uses the staff of the registered Agent.
Comments on suppliers In virtue of the nature of its business activities its local transactions are seldom. Therefore, commercial sources consulted in the marketplace report that they are unable to establish subject's payment performance and general reputation regarding commitments contracted as same it is UNKNOWN as making
use of credit facilities.
Comments on Shareholders The company is owned by foreign shareholders.
Comments on Management It is locally managed by the registered agent mentioned above. The agent declined to give any information on the subject, who is protected by the law of non disclosure.
Affiliations Comments We could not identify any affiliated Company during our investigation.

Financials
Currency Change USD
Listed at the stock exchange No
Capital Paid up N.A
Capital N.A
Number of shares 50,000
Annual Financials {Currency : USD}
Date 2021
Operating Income 6,150,000
Net Income 6,150,000
Legal Records
OFAC List No
Bankruptcy No
Lawsuit(s) No
Summary
Company
operations
Not confirmed
Size Small
Experience Good
Group International
Trade
references
N.A.
Payments Regular
Profitability Good
Indebtedness Nil
Legal
Records
No
General
Overview
Average
Credit risk
analysis
We are reporting upon a finance and investments company which belongs to foreign shareholders. Although it is registered in the British Virgin Islands, it uses such territory only as its legal and administrative address, but all its operations are carried out abroad. It is managed by a resident registration agent and it is unknown in the marketplace, so its commercial morality and general reputation cannot be assessed, although nothing detrimental is noted upon subject. As there are no visible assets, and taking into account also that it is unknown as making use of credit facilities, credit in general must be regarded as a matter of confidence, and amounts of certain importance would have to be secured by collateral. A credit line maybe considered for USD 100 000.

Interview
Contact
Name
Contact
Position
Interview
N.A. Registered
Agent
She confirmed the name of the company but declined to provide any other information. The name of PRESERVATION TREATMENTS
LIMITED was disclosed. Information in the report has been obtained from local official registry and third party sources.

Country Overview
Political
Regime
Economic
Risk
-
British
Overseas
Parliamentary
Nil BVI International Business Companies (IBCs) are the off-shore companies with a great number of advantages, such as: 1)
Exemption from payment of any income tax; 2) Can conduct most business transactions (except conducting banking and
insurance activities and other businesses with residents of the BVI; or to possess real estate in BVI); 3) Requires a minimum
of only one shareholder and one director; 4) The directors and shareholders can be entities or individuals resident in any
country; 5) The shares can be issued to the bearer or registered; 6) The Board of Directors can meet in any part of the world
and even by telephone; 7) The payment of minimum capital is not required, and the shares can be issued at par or non par
value; 8) The names of the Directors, Officers and shareholders do not need to be registered in a public record 9) No need to
file annual reports nor tax returns; 10) Can transfer its domicile and continue existing as a company incorporated under the
laws of a jurisdiction outside of BVI; a foreign company can also become a BVI IBC; 11) Neither the minutes book nor the
shares book need to be certified by any authority of BVI; 12) It is not necessary to carry out Directors or shareholder
meetings on a regular basis. 13) The name of the company must include the word 'Limited', 'Corporation' or 'Incorporation', or
the abbreviation 'Ltd.', 'Corp.', 'Inc.' or 'S.A.'. Names in Chinese characters may also be recorded. 14) It is not necessary to
issue shares of the company, unless the Board of directors decides so. 15) The IBC can be dissolved by resolution of the
Board of directors, if no shares have been issued. In case that the shares have been issued, the company must be
dissolved through a shareholders resolution. 16) All the dividends, interest, rents, royalties, compensations and other
amounts paid by company established under the IBC Act to persons that are non-residents of BVI are exempt from payment
of income tax. The capital gains earned from the sale of whatever shares or other securities of an IBC are also exempt from
payment of any tax.
Financial Year
Number of Weeks
Currency
Consolidated Accounts
4/8
Profit and Loss
Revenue - - -
Operating Costs - - -
Operating Profit - - -
Wages & Salaries - - -
Pension Costs - - -
Depreciation - - -
Amortisation - - -
Financial Income - - -
Financial Expenses - - -
Extraordinary Income - - -
Extraordinary Costs - - -
Profit before Tax - - -
Tax - - -
Profit after Tax - - -
Dividends - - -
Minority Interests - - -
Other Appropriations - - -
Retained Profit - - -
5/8
Balance Sheet
Land & Buildings 0 0 0
Plant & Machinery 0 0 0
Other Tangible Assets 0 0 0
Total Tangible Assets 0 0 0
Goodwill 0 0 0
Other Intangible Assets 0 0 0
Total Intangible Assets 0 0 0
Investments 0 0 0
Loans to Group 0 0 0
Other Loans 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 0 0 0
Total Other Fixed Assets 0 0 0
Total Fixed Assets 0 0 0
Raw Materials 0 0 0
Work in Progress 0 0 0
Finished Goods 0 0 0
Other Inventories 0 0 0
Total Inventories 0 0 0
Trade Receivables 0 0 0
Group Receivables 0 0 0
Receivables Due after 1 year 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Receivables 0 0 0
Total Receivables 0 0 0
Cash 0 0 0
Other Current Assets 0 0 0
Total Current Assets 0 0 0
Total Assets 0 0 0
Trade Payables 0 0 0
Bank Liabilities 0 0 0
Other Loans or Finance 0 0 0
Group Payables 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Liabilities 0 0 0
Total Current Liabilities 0 0 0
Trade Payables After 1 Year 0 0 0
Bank Liabilities After 1 Year 0 0 0
Other Loans or Finance due after 1 year 0 0 0
Group Payables After 1 Year 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Liabilities Due After 1 Year 0 0 0
Total Long Term Liabilities 0 0 0
Total Liabilities 0 0 0
Called Up Share Capital 0 0 0
Share Premium 0 0 0
Revenue Reserves 0 0 0
Other Reserves 0 0 0
Total Shareholders Equity 0 0 0
Other Financials
Contingent Liabilities
Working Capital 0 0 0
Net Worth 0 0 0
6/8
Ratios
Pre Tax Profit Margin
Return On Capital Employed
Return On Total Assets Employed
Return On Net Assets Employed
Sales / Net Working Capital
Stock Turnover Ratio
Debtor Days
Creditor Days
Current Ratio
Liquidity Ratio Or Acid Test
Current Debt Ratio
Gearing
Equity In Percentage
Total Debt Ratio
Credit Score
Current Common Credit Rating C
Current Common Rating Description Moderate Risk
Current Credit Limit 100.000 USD
Current Provider Credit Rating 11/20
Current Provider Rating Description Moderate Risk
Previous Common Credit Rating
Previous Common Rating Description
Previous Credit Limit -
Previous Provider Credit Rating
Previous Provider Rating Description
Current Contract Limit -
Date of Latest Rating Change
Creditsafe Common Score
Score Description
A Very Low Risk
B Low Risk
C Moderate Risk
D High Risk
E Not Rated
Directors/Managers
No directors information for this company
Share Capital Structure
Nominal Share Capital
Issued Share Capital
Shareholders
Shareholder Address % Shares Held
No Shareholders for this company.
Group Structure
No group structure information for this company
7/8
Negative Information
No negative information for this company
8/8
You win the prize for the longest copy-and-paste post that people will scroll through :-)
 
Well...we are a week into this thread. The momentum has slowed somewhat after early zeal. 56 pages and 62k views. Still, only 6 days in...plenty of time to get those posts in to make this the largest thread ever in Shrimperzone history - and what a history-changing thread it will be. Do we get new owners? Will they be loaded? Will the new stadium get started? Will Kev and his gang be able to access more players? Will onions become part of our culinary glory? Will the mushrooms please stop being harvested from the urinals?
 
Today's Price of Football Podcast is quite interesting, as it covers your club and some of the key players at the organisation that is preparing it for sale. Specifically, Andy Appleby used to own Derby (and Kieran Maguire said he thought it was him who sold the club to Mel Morris).

He also mentions Jez Moxey, who has had involvement with a few clubs and Maguire says he is still a Director of the EFL. He (Maguire) expressed some unease about the potential conflicts of interest here, in terms of Moxey's potential access to EFL data and other sensitive information.

I'd have thought that more to the point would be him having a role at a club that still has aspirations to be an EFL club next season, but the conflicts may be more potential than actual.

Starts about 39 minutes from the end.

EDIT: its actually around 41mins into the show...
 
my head hurts from all of this to and fro of the different debts owed and mortgages etc,
is there someone on here that can summarise exactly what is owed , are we talking to £25million to Martin, or is the debt higher. Is anyone buying the club ,going to own anything other than the name, or will they get a 3 sided stadium and thats it, will they own the retail outlets, etc. West Ham got themselves a good deal , brady and the 2sex pests(sorry 1 !!) get the local citizens to pay towards the stadium and take the profits from the outlets I believe
Just the stadium if it’s built. But it will be the club and the hope of a stadium. Unless rm has to give up a chunk of the property side for a cash injection. It’s all as clear as mud but that’s no surprise aha what a mess
Let’s hope we are told the details of the deal and who will own what of the flats
 
Last edited:
I'm hearing that Ron allegedly approached (directly) an extremely wealthy former NBA player in December with a view to selling up. The guy in question is particularly interested in a club that he could potentially grow in a traditional sense. I'm told the goal posts were moved several times and the guy pulled out.

Despite being Canadian and a former basketball player the person in question is a football purist with family in London.
Whether or not a deal can be resurrected now negotiations are being handled by a Sports Agency remains to be seen.
 
I'm hearing that Ron allegedly approached (directly) an extremely wealthy former NBA player in December with a view to selling up. The guy in question is particularly interested in a club that he could potentially grow in a traditional sense. I'm told the goal posts were moved several times and the guy pulled out.

Despite being Canadian and a former basketball player the person in question is a football purist with family in London.
Whether or not a deal can be resurrected now negotiations are being handled by a Sports Agency remains to be seen.
RM move the goal posts,,,surely not.🙄
 
I'm hearing that Ron allegedly approached (directly) an extremely wealthy former NBA player in December with a view to selling up. The guy in question is particularly interested in a club that he could potentially grow in a traditional sense. I'm told the goal posts were moved several times and the guy pulled out.

Despite being Canadian and a former basketball player the person in question is a football purist with family in London.
Whether or not a deal can be resurrected now negotiations are being handled by a Sports Agency remains to be seen.
Steve Nash ?
 
I'm hearing that Ron allegedly approached (directly) an extremely wealthy former NBA player in December with a view to selling up. The guy in question is particularly interested in a club that he could potentially grow in a traditional sense. I'm told the goal posts were moved several times and the guy pulled out.

Despite being Canadian and a former basketball player the person in question is a football purist with family in London.
Whether or not a deal can be resurrected now negotiations are being handled by a Sports Agency remains to be seen.
And there in lies thd problem, Ron. Instead of trying to offer a good deal to someone and something that would work, Ron will just move the goalposts.
 
Article shared by Shrimper Matt Slater from a colleague of his at The Athletic

Fear and losses in the National League: ‘Clubs of our size generally lose around £1m a year’

There is a scene in the Welcome to Wrexham documentary series when reality begins to bite at the Racecourse Ground.

Co-owner Rob McElhenney is on the phone with Shaun Harvey, advisor to the club’s board, and there are some financial issues to be addressed.

The planned playing budget of £1.5million ($1.8m) for a season in the National League — the fifth-tier of English football and its top division below the EFL — can be forgotten, confesses Harvey. “You’re going to be somewhere near £2.3million,” he says.

McElhenney, on the other side of the Atlantic, winces.

None of it, you suspect, can have come as a complete surprise. McElhenney and Ryan Reynolds, the famous faces in charge of the Welsh club, had already been told Wrexham were forecast to lose £1.1million in their first season of ownership. If they failed to win promotion to the EFL, which is what happened as they suffered defeat in the play-offs, and the same would happen again. “That’s scary as ****,” Reynolds said, bluntly.

Then came the sentence that has become emblematic of financial life for a large number of clubs beyond the three divisions of the EFL.

“You always talked about it being sustainable,” Harvey tells McElhenney. “Well, it’s sustainable as long as you’re happy to continue paying for it.”

Indeed.

Wrexham are yet to publish their first full set of accounts under McElhenney and Reynolds for a 2021-22 season that will juxtapose an enormous spike in revenues against unprecedented spending. However, plenty of their fellow National League clubs have already painted a stark picture of the investments being made to try to scramble up the ladder into the EFL.

Wrexham
A snack bar brings in some extra revenue at Wrexham’s Racecourse Ground (Photo: Oli Scarff/AFP via Getty Images)
Notts County, the club battling for the division’s sole automatic promotion spot this season with top-placed Wrexham, showed a loss of £1.7million for 2021-22. Total borrowing from the club’s owners, meanwhile, had climbed to £12million.

Woking, another club aiming for EFL promotion under American ownership this season, lost £965,000 when they finished 15th in the 23-team division. Their accounts detailed that director Drew Volpe had lent £575,000 to a club who have never made it out of non-League in their 136-year history.

The list of National League clubs reliant on the financial support of their owners is long and extends to the regional divisions that sit directly below it in the sixth tier. AFC Fylde and Ebbsfleet top National League North and South respectively, but both have spent heavily in pursuit of success.

Fylde, a Lancashire club with two EFL near-neighbours in Blackpool (Championship) and Fleetwood Town (League One), attract average home crowds of around 1,000 and have racked up borrowings of £1.3million to owner David Haythornthwaite. Meanwhile, Kent side Ebbsfleet lost broadly that amount in the 2020-21 season alone. Their last set of accounts, running to the summer of 2021, showed loans of £3.7million. “The company is reliant on its ultimate parent company, Kuwaiti European Holding Company (KSC), for continued financial support,” said a note in the accounts.

Non-League football is changing. Overseas investment has become increasingly common and so, too, is a willingness to chase success through increased spending. Making annual losses has become the norm. It has been estimated that the average annual deficit for a National League club is somewhere close to £700,000.

Chesterfield, who are next in line below the current top three of Wrexham, Notts County and Woking in the hunt for promotion out of National League, are another club operating in the red to stay in the arms race. Their financial support comes from Phil and Ashley Kirk, wealthy fans who last year agreed to invest an initial £1million into the club they grew up supporting. “Our only wish is to do good for the town and for the club,” the Kirks said last year.

Those resources have ensured Chesterfield remain able to compete under Paul Cook, a manager with many years of experience in all three EFL divisions, after posting losses of £2.37million last season, but also underline a stark reality. Without a willingness to take a heavy financial hit, the thought of reaching the EFL grows ever more fanciful. Losses are more of a necessity than a choice.

“It doesn’t make it right but, for clubs of a certain size, you’re almost expecting a loss,” says Chesterfield chief executive John Croot, a stalwart who joined the club’s board in 1987.

“I tend to think clubs of our size generally lose around the £1million mark a year at this level. If you’re serious about challenging in the National League, that’s almost what you have to do. There are exceptions, like Sutton, who went up in the COVID year (2020-21), but it’s very hard to avoid a loss if you’re trying to win promotion.

“We don’t accept it’s the way it has to be. We’re fortunate we’ve got an investor, but it comes back to trying to become sustainable. We accept we can’t do that this year, or the year after. It has to be long-term.”

Can a club such as Chesterfield, who were relegated from League Two in 2017-18, ever hope to be sustainable while playing in the National League? “That’s a bloody good question, to be honest,” says Croot, who has welcomed an impressive average attendance of almost 7,000 to games at Technique Stadium, just south of Sheffield, this season.

“We’re going to aim to be, but it’s not as if we can say we’ll have a budget of £700,000 because then our attendances would drop accordingly and, in all probability, we’d be bottom half of the National League. We need help trying to be sustainable.”

There are exceptions to the rule that says success can only come with spending in National League.

Wealdstone, a part-time club from the north west outskirts of London, are believed to operate on one of the division’s smallest budgets and yet are currently eighth. Boreham Wood, who are from the same area and reached the FA Cup fifth round last season, are another to command admiration for their ongoing progress. They are seventh.

However, to achieve promotion to the EFL is usually expensive.

Stockport County’s route back, achieved in 2022 after 11 years in non-League, came with losses of £2.6million last season and they were reliant on owner Mark Stott converting a £7.7million debt into equity in the summer after the side from Manchester’s southern outskirts had gone up as champions. “This puts the club in a strong financial position and for this, we are very grateful,” said their chief executive Jonathan Vaughan.

Grimsby Town, too, lost just short of £1million in the season that concluded with their win in the National League play-off final over Solihull Moors last May.

Wrexham are odds-on favourites to follow that lead and, even with two months of fresh streaming income of £225,000 between December and February, will already know any promotion comes at a cost.

The level of spending under McElhenney and Reynolds has set them far apart from the National League crowd in the past 18 months. Paul Mullin is thought to be the highest-earning player below the EFL, having joined on a free transfer in the summer of 2021 after his 32 league goals helped Cambridge United win automatic promotion out of League Two; fellow forward Ollie Palmer’s £300,000 move from third-tier AFC Wimbledon the following January pushed the wage bill up even higher.

This season has seen more signings from EFL clubs, including Elliot Lee (having just helped Luton Town win promotion to the Championship), Mark Howard (from League Two’s Carlisle United) and Jordan Tunnicliffe (League Two’s Crawley Town) on frees, as well as Eoghan O’Connell (Charlton Athletic of League One), Andy Cannon (the Championship’s Hull City) and Anthony Forde (League One’s Oxford United) for undisclosed sums.

Nothing was being left to chance ahead of Thursday’s National League transfer deadline, either.

Wrexham signed Billy Waters, second-leading goalscorer this season for League Two Barrow, before luring Ben Foster, the former Manchester United and Watford goalkeeper who played for England in the 2014 World Cup, out of retirement on a contract that will run until the summer. “Wages wise, it’s literally peanuts,” Foster told his Fozcast podcast.

The current playing budget at Wrexham is closely guarded, but some National League rivals believe it has climbed north of £3million and potentially as high as £3.5million. Some clubs in League One do not spend that much.

Paul Mullin
“We went to Wrexham (this week) last year and lost 6-5 in the 98th minute,” says Jim Parmenter, who has owned Dover Athletic, now in National League South, for 19 years.

“They were very pleased, but I told them our entire playing squad was on less than one of their strikers. That gives you a reflection of where we are with financial differences now.”

Dover finished bottom of the 2021-22 National League, winning just two of their 44 matches. A 12-point deduction, handed out after not fulfilling all games during the pandemic-affected previous season, meant they ended the campaign with just one point.

This season has been one of consolidation, but Parmenter accepts Dover, currently 16th in the 24-team table, cannot keep pace in an increasingly competitive field.

“It’s very challenging for us this season,” he adds. “Every week we’re wondering where the wages are going to come from. And I don’t believe we’re by any means unique in that. I’d say there’s 30 per cent of clubs thinking about how they’re going to get promoted and 70 per cent thinking about how they’re going to survive. You can put that across most of non-League football.

“There’s an unrealistic expectation for individuals to just keep putting their personal wealth into football clubs, even though it brings no guarantees. I’ve put a significant amount into Dover in the last 19 years — millions. Even if I put in another £1million over the next five years, it would make no difference to compete at the top table.

“The clubs spending a lot of the money (in the National League) are the ex-league clubs. It used to be a league of dreams, where small, well-run clubs could build and have a good chance of promotion to the Football League, but that’s gone. It’s sad.”

If the National League has developed competitive faults, though, its popularity continues to grow.

Six of its 24 clubs currently boast an average attendance of over 4,500 and another eight consistently top the 2,000 mark. Kidderminster Harriers, Chester and Dulwich Hamlet do the same in the regional divisions below.

And therein lies the attraction and appeal to outside investors.

The National League now presents opportunities and a route to the EFL without being hampered by spending restrictions. Significant TV money might not come with winning promotion — roughly £1million in solidarity payments per year as a League Two club — but there is no shortage of owners prepared to splash the cash to try to get there.

All but two or three of the 24 National League clubs now operate a full-time playing squad. It has become League Three in all but name.

The trickle-down is also evident.

As well as big-spending Fylde and Ebbsfleet, King’s Lynn Town and Havant & Waterlooville are both thought to be carrying big budgets in an attempt to get promoted to the National League this season. South Shields, with former England forward Kevin Phillips as manager, have also shown enormous ambition in their attempts to climb out of the seventh-tier Northern Premier League.

Everyone wants to be somewhere else, but some within non-League see risks in the benefactor model. It is only sound so long as your owner retains enthusiasm for the project.

Salary caps do not exist in National League, nor does any form of the financial fair play safeguarding in place for Premier League and EFL sides.

The National League says protection instead comes from its own financial reporting mechanism, where monthly checks are carried out to identify any clubs unable to meet their obligations, such as PAYE tax. Big-money signings, too, have to be approved by the league, which first seeks assurances the buying club can afford the deal.

One potential means of curbing clubs’ spending are the new contracts proposed by the Football Association this week.

The changes would see injured non-League players only paid in full for 12 weeks before reverting to statutory sick pay of £99.35 ($121.36) per week. The Professional Footballers’ Association, effectively the players’ trade union, says it will not support these new contracts and it remains to be seen if the National League’s top clubs would opt-in when signing a player from the EFL.

“There’s no restriction on what you pay your players, or what you spend on players,” says Dover’s Parmenter, who believes one club in the Isthmian League (the seventh and eighth tiers of the English game) are paying a player £1,000 per week this season. “Supporters of those clubs love it because they get success, but what happens when they don’t? And that’ll happen.

“The only answer for me is a salary cap — I’ve argued that when I was on the National League board. Some clubs will always be able to spend more than other clubs, that’s never going to change, but there needs to be a scale which enables the less well-off clubs to compete. At the moment, there’s no level playing field.”

The awkward question in all this is where a landscape dominated by benefactor-backed clubs leaves those that are fan-owned. Can they still hope to do what Exeter City did in 2007-08 and AFC Wimbledon three years later and win promotion out of the National League? On this latest annual Non-League Day in the football calendar, is romance still alive?

Chester FC, formed in the wake of former EFL club Chester City’s financial collapse in 2010, are hopeful this will be the season they get promoted from National League North. They are currently third. Fellow fan-owned sides Darlington (fifth) and Scarborough Athletic (seventh) are also in the mix to go up to non-League’s top tier.

“The way the game is set up at the moment, it presents challenges for supporter-owned clubs who are committed to sustainability,” says Jim Green, Chester’s vice-chairman.

“We’ve lobbied fairly extensively around the changes we feel English football needs to introduce and some of the stuff that’s come out of the recent white paper is really heartening. Whether it goes as far as we think it needs to, we’ll find out. But they are steps in the right direction.”

That UK government white paper for reforming English football, published in February, proposed an independent regulator which would go as far down the pyramid as the National League but no further. However, the hope is that a cultural change would follow. That was clear last week as Chester hosted the annual conference of Fair Game, a band of clubs campaigning to improve football governance.

“You look at what clubs are spending in the National League, less so in the National League North and South, and it’s eye-opening to see what we would be competing against up there,” Green says.

“Clubs are in a position where they can post multi-million-pound losses. We would say that’s not sustainable but the owners of the clubs I’m sure will say it’s sustainable as long as they keep putting their hands in their pockets.

“I can understand the incentives of getting into the EFL. The funding distribution in League Two is on a different level to what clubs get in National League, so I understand the attraction, but there are only two clubs that can go up each season.

“Whether it’s wages or transfer fees, there are astronomical amounts being paid for players and that will always be a gamble. Where does that club stand if one individual walks away? We can only focus on what we’re doing and build our club up.”

You can drive between Wrexham and Chester in half an hour, but their football clubs are worlds apart financially. It is the new National League in a nutshell.

Why Americans are investing in EFL clubs: Wrexham factor, promotion lure and a strong dollar
 
Most probably. Supports Spurs and think he owns part of another club abroad?
I think Steve Nash may indeed be the man in question.
Taken from Wikipedia:

Nash, whose father was born in the Tottenham district of London, is a lifelong Tottenham Hotspur supporter, and has expressed interest in owning a minority stake in the club. "I'd like to be an owner. It's something I could do for the rest of my life after my little window of popularity dies", he said in an interview with The New York Times.[163] Nash added, "I've been a passionate supporter all my life. My parents are from north London and so it's not like I'm some Yank who wants to make a profit out of football. I don't care about making money. I just want to see Spurs succeed and, if I can help, that's great." However, he said any participation in Spurs would come after his basketball career is over, and he has had only "casual contact" with chairman Daniel Levy and former director of football Damien Comolli.[164] Nash is also a fan of Spain's FC Barcelona,[77] and Brazilian team Sport Club Corinthians Paulista, which his former Suns teammate Leandro Barbosa supports. When Barbosa visited Corinthians in 2007, the club gave him a shirt with Nash's name and jersey number.[165]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top