• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Stewart’s Law to ask court to dismiss WUP proceedings - settlement reached with SUFC

All the other clubs have provided detailed finance and accounting info which demonstrates that they can be fully funded and meet their financial obligations throughout the season.

SUFC have not.
Have they? Or are the league just making that assumption because the other clubs are not currently involved in litigation?
 
Dullard is right. The Martins are obviously the lead villains here but the NL had no reason to do this with a takeover pending.
I guess the problem for them is the takeover has been pending for nearly 7 months with no end in sight, from their perspective at least.
 
Not denying that, but would they have done the same to another club who the D&R **** didn't have a hate on for?
Probably not. They've even been told they've been harsh on us in the past.

As I said on another thread, the problem is that we, and the rat, know what they're like so why give them the chance? Why should rat expect them to play nicely when he doesn't? Don't forget, he's still the owner, even if it is in name only.
 
Back
Top