Firestorm
Pedant
250K to 400K is an increase of 60% or 4.6% pa over the 13 years ...So inflation is 300%
250K to 400K is an increase of 60% or 4.6% pa over the 13 years ...So inflation is 300%
Sorry, you can't issue one club a bond for just that reason, otherwise you should be asking every other club to provide a 1M bond!The bond is to satisfy the National League we can make it through the season, totally separate from the embargo/WUP. The bond will not be needed if the club is sold to COSU, if the club remains in Rons hands we need to pay the £1 million bond.
The WUP sounds as though Stewarts are happy but we haven't yet cleared PG Site Services, if we can settle with them then we just need the WUP officially to be dismissed and then the embargo should be lifted I would imagine. but the bond is separate.
i’ve really enjoyed the competition on the pitch / fans banter and so on.If all goes well and we get through this ****e I long for the day when we can say goodbye to this Micky mouse league with a large.![]()
Edited for accuracy & I suggest when we hopefully & eventually get promoted we organise coaches to Birmingham to cr@p all over their doorstep, or at least in the lift to the 4th Floor of Waterloo House where they lurk.If all goes well and we get through this ****e I long for the day when we can say goodbye to this Micky mouse league with a large.![]()
Wrexham were in a different position having been reformed in 2006 after going bust but in 2011 the latest accounts were to 2009 and showed they owed about 5M , so nowhere near our 25M even after inflationThey haven't, but they'll point to the fact they did a very similar thing to Wrexham in 2011. That bond was only £250k (just under £400k when you account for inflation) but I'm not sure if our balance sheet is worse than Wrexham's was:
![]()
Wrexham FC asked to provide £250k guarantee to Football Conference
Wrexham FC have been asked by the Football Conference to provide a £250,000 bond or bank guarantee by Monday, as well as proof that all players and staff have been paid.www.dailypost.co.uk
250K to 400K is an increase of 60% or 4.6% pa over the 13 years ...
All the other clubs have provided detailed finance and accounting info which demonstrates that they can be fully funded and meet their financial obligations throughout the season.Sorry, you can't issue one club a bond for just that reason, otherwise you should be asking every other club to provide a 1M bond!
Have they? Not publicly they haven't. Most clubs don't publish accounts anywhere near as detailed as ours.All the other clubs have provided detailed finance and accounting info which demonstrates that they can be fully funded and meet their financial obligations throughout the season.
SUFC have not.
No, not publicly. It gets submitted directly to the National League.Have they? Not publicly they haven't. Most clubs don't publish accounts anywhere near as detailed as ours.
I would imagine that proof of funds would be required for clubs, who have negative balance sheets being covered by wealthy owners, as wellNo, not publicly. It gets submitted directly to the National League.
No club can, with any certainty, guarantee in advance they are (and will remain) fully funded for a whole season.All the other clubs have provided detailed finance and accounting info which demonstrates that they can be fully funded and meet their financial obligations throughout the season.
SUFC have not.
Tin-pot is as tin-pot does. They’ve always been sh1te!If anyone is bothered, the National League Rules for the 23/24 Season can be downloaded here
https://www.thenationalleague.org.uk/downloads/rules
For a League that make it up as they go along so far there are 129 pages of rules.
Appendices D and E pages 77 to 88 cover detailed financial monitoring for all clubs.
With our financial accounting record is hardly surprising they have kept a close eye on our financial situation.
who's vice-chairman?That the vice chairman despises us and always has ?
Stephen Thompson MBE (Daggers MD)who's vice-chairman?