Maidstone Shrimper
Old Fella⭐⭐
This latest Echo article says: "If the red cards are not overturned, Taylor will be handed a two match ban and Scott-Morriss will be given a two-match suspension." I'm sure Taylor's is a one match ban.
Extra ban for losing the appeal I thinkThis latest Echo article says: "If the red cards are not overturned, Taylor will be handed a two match ban and Scott-Morriss will be given a two-match suspension." I'm sure Taylor's is a one match ban.
I don’t think that’s how it works. You only get an extra game if it’s deemed a frivolous appeal. Even if we lose, it’s not a completely unreasonable appeal. I’m sure it will stay as a 1 match ban.Extra ban for losing the appeal I think
No there isn't. This belief has lived amongst the SUFC fanbase for 18 years because we are one of the few clubs to ever get done for this when Eastwood has his ban extended in 2005 (unjustly, too). They believed we did it to delay his suspension, if memory serves me correctly, as we played Southampton in the cup on TV on the Monday after he was sent off.Extra ban for losing the appeal I think
Three cases listed being heard at 14.00 tomorrowThe court case tomorrow is down to unpaid npower bills apparently so tomorrow no keeper or probably floodlights!... another fine day at Southend!
Tight hamstring ?Oli is hoping to be OK. I spoke to him this morning.
It's ridiculous.... There's only so many utility access points one van can be moved to cover!Three cases listed being heard at 14.00 tomorrow
Somewhat surprised if they ,NPower , have issued a complaint re debt enforcement ( a debt I think that we were told RM had agreed to personally pay ) but it’s not impossible but could it be the reason of the hearing is two or three fold and one is to get a warrant to gain access to enable disconnection
Or another Bentley?t's ridiculous.... There's only so many utility access points one van can be moved to cover!
Gonna have to find another van!
A Dan Bentley would be useful if Colin is injured!Or another Bentley?
Totally agree, I've never seen an appeal result in an additional suspension, either before or after this. Still no idea why we were punished this way. Seen so many examples of players being pushed which resulted in no booking, let alone a sending off, therefore an appeal wasn't frivolous. It's not as if Eastwood punched the guy!!No there isn't. This belief has lived amongst the SUFC fanbase for 18 years because we are one of the few clubs to ever get done for this when Eastwood has his ban extended in 2005 (unjustly, too). They believed we did it to delay his suspension, if memory serves me correctly, as we played Southampton in the cup on TV on the Monday after he was sent off.
It has seldom happened to anyone else.
No.So were we successful with the appeals?