Sokolik set to leave.

[RHB]

The point is if PB had wanted Sokolik involved then he could have played Coker instead of Kip or Lenny instead of King and kept to the rules.

He wanted Timlin involved and I think you'll agree he was the best of a bad bunch. No surprises when he made the team for Bury. Tims has gone on to do really well at LB and showed us how useful he can be.

PB has his reason's for not finding room for Sokolik even at Stevenage. So no shock when his contract hasn't been extended. Maybe we already have another CB lined up....Perhaps someone on loan.

You certainly have a way with words. I didn't need that game to show me how useful Timlin can be, I knew it already. As for Sokolik, as I said in an earlier post, he was never going to get a decent run in the side this time round. That is a shame as I could see the makings of a decent player in him which needed nurturing. I don't think he was/is better than the current twosome but he was a very decent cover player who could have grown to be a first choice. Again, PB's decision, but not one I agreed with.

 

[Mad Cyril]

We would be crackers to get rid of Jakob.

 

[rigsby]

We would be crackers to get rid of Jakob.

It would certainly leave a dry taste in the mouth.

 

[Ironshrimper]

I'd rather keep Sokolik and send King back to Swansea...

yes I can't like your post (when will this bad boy ban lift) King currently is not good enough even for cover (I thought that was the idear of a loan) we will see.

 

[Rattus Norvegicus]

Sokko has signed for Plymouth says the B.B.C. interweb page.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/38508199