Ok - so we would still be reliant on rat not changing his mind on Thursday?In my previous experience one does not agree heads of terms unless they're generally happy with the contents of a deal. There could be changes but hopefully not.
The rat will still control the club, but I doubt he will run it between now and completion. In fact, I doubt he's run much of the club for a while now.
This is probably the burning question. If contracts are being thrashed out by the parties, then we have an intention to enter legal relations and I'd feel quite happy with it all.Ok - so we would still be reliant on rat not changing his mind on Thursday?
If so - champagne stays on ice for me.
Is this a pseudonym?Struggling to keep the cork in the bottle. Its frothing!
Is this quote just hopeful or has substance?
Struggling to keep the cork in the bottle. Its frothing!
Is this quote just hopeful or has substance?
troubled by the amount of liquid in this threadMOIST
Or maybe a euphemism?Is this a pseudonym?
Or, a play on wordsIs this a pseudonym?
Yeah. I can’t imagine JR would agree to pay £100k for hmrc debt without some kind of assurance that Ron won’t ignore him the next day. That’s the answer I wantThis is probably the burning question. If contracts are being thrashed out by the parties, then we have an intention to enter legal relations and I'd feel quite happy with it all.
Be interested to hear if we have a date set for completion as well.
What’s my style????Really hoping someone steps up and does an ORM-style thread...
Pre-Wallop.Wallop.
Pre pre wallopPre-Wallop.
95%+++Pre-Wallop.
Heads of terms for a business deal such as this could constitute a whole contract in itself.Yeah. I can’t imagine JR would agree to pay £100k for hmrc debt without some kind of assurance that Ron won’t ignore him the next day. That’s the answer I want
Just wait until it really goes off. Gonna get soaking in heretroubled by the amount of liquid in this thread