• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Zone Update Ron martin - non answered questions

Q: "and has always been close to this amount (o/site 3/10/06 - the stadium element will cost upwards of £25million excluding the hotel complex) no real difference here"

A: The difference between say £35M and £80M is the topic of the thread

The 35 million is for the stadium, the £45 million, i presume is for the Hotel, the flats, the shops, the academy, the training ground and the car park. Along with the improvements to the road system that we have to contribute to and the large amount of cash we have to give to southend council under some scheme that i'm not that hot on but all major developments have to give so much to the council, i believe to use on community projects ???

Q: Do you know that Morgan Stanley have insisted on this as i dont remember reading anywhere that this is the case, please correct me if i am wrong

A: This was reported in the Evening Echo I believe under quote from RM himself

I stand corrected, as i am not an avid reader of the Echo i did not realise that this was the case.


Q: Not quite true the official site on the 7/3/08 quotes a figure of just over £50million and had £80 million been cofirmed by Ron ?? It could be a bit of sensationalist journalism by round up figures. If this figure is correct is there a simple way of explaining why its has increased thos much e.g. credit crunch, higher fuel prices etc etc.

A: Are you RM's spokesperson and know this to be a fact ? A seat in any typical current build stadium is on all last known industry figures quoted at upper estimate = £1,600. Hence 1,600 x 22,000 = £35.2 million, so where does £50 or £80M come from ?

This exactly backs up my point ! the £35.2 million is for the stadium and i assume the rest is for all the bells and whistles that go with it and no i'm not Rons spokesman, the last one, Mr Main, didnt last very long.

That was the purpose of the thread, to seek clarification and your "credit crunch/fuel prices" does not account for up to £45M black hole.

No it doesnt but if you carefully read what i wrote you will see that i only threw it in as a suggestion but after thinking further you will see that i offer a few more suggestions as to where the money will be spent.
Q: correct me if i am wrong but Ron/Martin Dawn bought out the other owners of the club (Delancy) before we asked for planning permission, which was the reason for its delay in the first place so how can he be using some of the money to pay them off ???


A: Are you taling about SUFC or Fossett Park development site ?


RM simply says more or less that, but the ultimate ownership of FF is not transparent from UK company records. The trail goes to Cyprus, and a company called: Jetbury Ltd, who have a reg office in Jersey but are incorporated in Cyprus.

As far as i was aware, and i my be a little naive here but i thought that the project will be owned by the club and the club is owned by RM/Martin Dawn and the financing of the stadium will be done as an SUFC thing.

Have not yet asked a contact/agent to go along to the registry in Cyprus, as had expected openness/disclosure to not be a problem to RM [if the assumptions made in your question were true], but it seems not to be the case, hence suggest you re-issue the question to RM himself.


Q: Excuse the flippancy but, to build the stadium and complex ???


A: Exactly, so why is it "Spun" in relation to an article concerning SUFC, as RM has not made it clear what or whether any "complex" buildings are to be part of SUFC revenue streams .. viz the request for clarity of the wider details & questions in that repsect [non answered].

I would probably think that these income streams are sensitive information to SUFC/RM and any potential leesees to would not expect anything to be divulged.

Q: Nor does he have to and i truly belive that 90/95% of the clubs support dont want to know they just want to sit in a shiny new stadium watching their favourite football team without knowing how every penny was spent building it.

A: Depends on your viewpoint and if the management want to carry grass roots supporters along and satisfy their concerns against their high ticket prices etc being as a conseqnce of the club being ripped of by the developers and the development costs/rental terms under any future lease.

Well as you quote only 5% of shrimperzoners read the FF forum and this community is but a small section of the clubs fanbase who dont seem to be battering down Rons door for the answers then i would suggest the majority of fans just want the stadium built without knowing the ins and outs.

Q: The £80 million is to build the Fossetts Farm Stadium and Complex so isnt that really where the thread should be ???


A: No. The question is financial, pertaining to how this figure has been arrived at and what it actually relates to as we know the sum is far in excess of the projected cost of stadium as publicised.

We probably got three estimates and went for the mid price one, and we all know that you never pay under the estimated price . Plus the figure relates to the Fossetts Farm complex, so it should be there !

Suppose to that extent £35M can be attibributed to FF out of ther £80M so the mods could say they are 44% correct to t/f to FF or 56% wrong.

Either way it does not promote healthy debate by moving to the graveyard.



Q: Not knowing much about mortgage fraud i cant comment, but by the fact that you have mentioned it, even under caveat, suggests that you think this is what is going on. Again i dont know but perhaps you should be a little more careful when you bandy these words around.


A: Do not seek to "suggest" anything of the sort, or put words into my mouth or your slant/interpretation on my statements.

I always choose my words carefully but thank you [not] for the advice.

If you didnt seek to suggest it then why mention it at all ??? You must have been thinking something along those lines to write what you did. If not then why write it ??

Q: Seat for Life was mentioned as one way of raising income, it is very common in new stadia in the USA and as Ron spoke to an American Bank i'm not really suprised that it was mentioned. It has never been said that this WILL happen and certainly no figures have been published so how can you know that the seat for life price has doubled ???


A: I don't but by the same token, neither do you. That is the reason that grass roots supporters need input/answers upon these further questions or
issues of concern.

If it is decided that Seat for Life is a goer then we will be told and how much it will cost us. Doesnt matter what the original price was, RM might have thought about giving them free with a packet of Rice Krispies and then changed his mind and made it Frosties and then changed it again and come up with a figure, all we need to know is the end result and no doubt he will milk it for all he thinks he can get, thats business.



Q: I hope and believe that the new stadium will eventually be of great benefit to the club and its aspirations, however, i can see a tough few years not only until we get the stadium but for the first 5 or even 10 when we move in.


A: No question raised.

Can i respectfully suggest Ian that you phone or email Ron again and put these questions again, but at the same time phone or e-mail the Chief Executive of Sainsburys to ask them how they propose to pay for the new Superstore that will be going on the Roots Hall land as we want to be sure that they can pay for the land so that we can put it towards the new stadium.
 
Is it possible that 5,000 SUFC supporters could be found to each raise £7,000 or 7,000 to raise £5,000 each = £35M.

With added investment from local companies, feel £50M should be also achievable.

If RM were minded it coud be done, in fairly short time IMO, just needs the will and determination, if it is such a struggle to raise it through the financial marketplace.

We couldnt find 5,000 to shell out £200 for shares so unlikely you'll many willing to shell out £5000 or £7000.
 
I haven't got the time, or energy, to read all of the posts on this topic, but I do find peoples reactions odd at times.

It would appear that if someone dare contact the club, be it Ron or Tilly, someone on here takes great offence to that, and suggest that they should NEVER be questioned, nor should they be accountable to us - the fans.

I recently posted in another thread, merely as a side issue, that I had recently been in email conversation with Ron (he was, to be fair, very quick with his replies) and was immediately taken to task by someone who thought I was, as a mere supporter, getting ideas above my station for daring to raise a couple of concerns I had.

I can't comment on the conversation between you and Ron, nor can I speculate as to the reason why he has not come back to you, but you are 100% entitled to ask any qestions you feel you need answers to regarding your football club. As I pointed out, we are paying customers in a purely economic sense, and that entitles to question any level of service (or thereabouts) which we may not be satisfied with - and to take it a step further, if you're a shareholder, then Ron is in fact completely answerable to you.

Hope you get the answers you, and no doubt we, all want.
 
I haven't got the time, or energy, to read all of the posts on this topic, but I do find peoples reactions odd at times.

It would appear that if someone dare contact the club, be it Ron or Tilly, someone on here takes great offence to that, and suggest that they should NEVER be questioned, nor should they be accountable to us - the fans.

Not sure if thats directed at my posts, but to be fair I was supportive of the questioning, just felt that things were getting a bit over the top with the repeated posts. We would all like answers, but I just felt this was getting a bit OTT
 
Yours further questions and my replies

Q: The 35 million is for the stadium, the £45 million, i presume is for the Hotel, the flats, the shops, the academy, the training ground and the car park. Along with the improvements to the road system that we have to contribute to and the large amount of cash we have to give to southend council under some scheme that i'm not that hot on but all major developments have to give so much to the council, i believe to use on community projects ???


A: This is for RM to clarify. Speculation may be less healthy than no knowing RM's intentions & may give other supporters false hopes of what revenue streams from "associated" development are to enure to SUFC.

He did mention Roots Hall Ltd to be the company who are likely to "manage" some of the development, so part of [but not fully disclosed] revenues are not apprently to go to SUFC


Q: I stand corrected, as i am not an avid reader of the Echo i did not realise that this was the case.


A: Echo is also on-line and has an archive search facility. Also has been published in other threads on SZ.



Q: This exactly backs up my point ! the £35.2 million is for the stadium and i assume the rest is for all the bells and whistles that go with it and no i'm not Rons spokesman, the last one, Mr Main, didnt last very long.


A: Speculation and assumptions not healthy for the reasons above.



Q: No it doesnt but if you carefully read what i wrote you will see that i only threw it in as a suggestion but after thinking further you will see that i offer a few more suggestions as to where the money will be spent.


A: Speculation, assumptions and now suggestions, not really condusive.



Q: As far as i was aware, and i my be a little naive here but i thought that the project will be owned by the club and the club is owned by RM/Martin Dawn and the financing of the stadium will be done as an SUFC thing.


A: This goes to the hub of and concerns the first of the question raised. RM has not clarified or been prepared to answer... but certainly I will be astounded and very pleased if what you "thought" was true.

The reality is that SUFC will be a mere tenant only. If we were to revisit this site in say 30 years time, the prospects are that SUFC [via its supporters - us], will likely have paid twice over the original cost of development and still own zero + be liable to pay ever increasing rents to the then owners or face being evicted/closed down.

SUFC are the vehicle by which all this development [both Fossetts and Roots Hall] is possible. What if anything is the consideration ?

The legacy the current owners & RM bestows upon the club in the legal documents will determine our fate.

He will effectively be also signing us up & binding us in [as the paying public] to any lease, and the covenants/terms of it would also be a major concern.



Q: I would probably think that these income streams are sensitive information to SUFC/RM and any potential leesees to would not expect anything to be divulged.


A: So his business plan/model for SUFC is what we need to concentrate upon and that should not IMO be "sensitive" or non-divulged to supporters and shareholders alike.



Q: Well as you quote only 5% of shrimperzoners read the FF forum and this community is but a small section of the clubs fanbase who dont seem to be battering down Rons door for the answers then i would suggest the majority of fans just want the stadium built without knowing the ins and outs.


A: Maybe some don't want to think about the unthinkable.

Maybe others are running scared about what RM may or not do.

Either way he stated "we don't have much choice in the matter" viz: he
knows he holds all the aces.

Let me say we had a clear meeting of minds and fair to say he can be
equally Irate. We may not love each other, but we both I hope had put
other andpersonal issues aside as this is business.

He may be a despot - hence his preparedness to ignore the questions
from the likes of me & my suggestion to shareholders, that they consider
to table agenda items for the next AGM in advance, if they are of the
opinion that the questions, or any of them need answering.



Q: We probably got three estimates and went for the mid price one, and we all know that you never pay under the estimated price . Plus the figure relates to the Fossetts Farm complex, so it should be there !


A: References to "the complex" are complexities in themselves. SUFC are not borrowing money [apart from the players it has no substantive "assets"] and are not property developers.

Apart from the inner sanctum of cross directors/officers, we are completely in the dark as to the cost of developing the stadium.



Q: If you didnt seek to suggest it then why mention it at all ??? You must have been thinking something along those lines to write what you did. If not then why write it ??


A: Example drawn down from my business experience and dealings with
others.



Q: If it is decided that Seat for Life is a goer then we will be told and how much it will cost us. Doesnt matter what the original price was, RM might have thought about giving them free with a packet of Rice Krispies and then changed his mind and made it Frosties and then changed it again and come up with a figure, all we need to know is the end result and no doubt he will milk it for all he thinks he can get, thats business.


A: Agree, but grass roots supporters need a voice and venue to oppose and debate any unreasonable demands of them. This is the place ?



Q: Can i respectfully suggest Ian that you phone or email Ron again and put these questions again, but at the same time phone or e-mail the Chief Executive of Sainsburys to ask them how they propose to pay for the new Superstore that will be going on the Roots Hall land as we want to be sure that they can pay for the land so that we can put it towards the new stadium.


A: No thanks, I do not do [much] business over the telephone. Prefer to keep things formal, in writing, in avoidance as to any doubt as to how the spoken word may be interpretted, or dispute as to what may or not have been stated, on both sides.


RM has my emails and is fully aware of his reasons to not stated intention to reply.
 
Yours further questions and my replies

Q: The 35 million is for the stadium, the £45 million, i presume is for the Hotel, the flats, the shops, the academy, the training ground and the car park. Along with the improvements to the road system that we have to contribute to and the large amount of cash we have to give to southend council under some scheme that i'm not that hot on but all major developments have to give so much to the council, i believe to use on community projects ???


A: This is for RM to clarify. Speculation may be less healthy than no knowing RM's intentions & may give other supporters false hopes of what revenue streams from "associated" development are to enure to SUFC.

He did mention Roots Hall Ltd to be the company who are likely to "manage" some of the development, so part of [but not fully disclosed] revenues are not apprently to go to SUFC


Q: I stand corrected, as i am not an avid reader of the Echo i did not realise that this was the case.


A: Echo is also on-line and has an archive search facility. Also has been published in other threads on SZ.



Q: This exactly backs up my point ! the £35.2 million is for the stadium and i assume the rest is for all the bells and whistles that go with it and no i'm not Rons spokesman, the last one, Mr Main, didnt last very long.


A: Speculation and assumptions not healthy for the reasons above.



Q: No it doesnt but if you carefully read what i wrote you will see that i only threw it in as a suggestion but after thinking further you will see that i offer a few more suggestions as to where the money will be spent.


A: Speculation, assumptions and now suggestions, not really condusive.



Q: As far as i was aware, and i my be a little naive here but i thought that the project will be owned by the club and the club is owned by RM/Martin Dawn and the financing of the stadium will be done as an SUFC thing.


A: This goes to the hub of and concerns the first of the question raised. RM has not clarified or been prepared to answer... but certainly I will be astounded and very pleased if what you "thought" was true.

The reality is that SUFC will be a mere tenant only. If we were to revisit this site in say 30 years time, the prospects are that SUFC [via its supporters - us], will likely have paid twice over the original cost of development and still own zero + be liable to pay ever increasing rents to the then owners or face being evicted/closed down.

SUFC are the vehicle by which all this development [both Fossetts and Roots Hall] is possible. What if anything is the consideration ?

The legacy the current owners & RM bestows upon the club in the legal documents will determine our fate.

He will effectively be also signing us up & binding us in [as the paying public] to any lease, and the covenants/terms of it would also be a major concern.



Q: I would probably think that these income streams are sensitive information to SUFC/RM and any potential leesees to would not expect anything to be divulged.


A: So his business plan/model for SUFC is what we need to concentrate upon and that should not IMO be "sensitive" or non-divulged to supporters and shareholders alike.



Q: Well as you quote only 5% of shrimperzoners read the FF forum and this community is but a small section of the clubs fanbase who dont seem to be battering down Rons door for the answers then i would suggest the majority of fans just want the stadium built without knowing the ins and outs.


A: Maybe some don't want to think about the unthinkable.

Maybe others are running scared about what RM may or not do.

Either way he stated "we don't have much choice in the matter" viz: he
knows he holds all the aces.

Let me say we had a clear meeting of minds and fair to say he can be
equally Irate. We may not love each other, but we both I hope had put
other andpersonal issues aside as this is business.

He may be a despot - hence his preparedness to ignore the questions
from the likes of me & my suggestion to shareholders, that they consider
to table agenda items for the next AGM in advance, if they are of the
opinion that the questions, or any of them need answering.



Q: We probably got three estimates and went for the mid price one, and we all know that you never pay under the estimated price . Plus the figure relates to the Fossetts Farm complex, so it should be there !


A: References to "the complex" are complexities in themselves. SUFC are not borrowing money [apart from the players it has no substantive "assets"] and are not property developers.

Apart from the inner sanctum of cross directors/officers, we are completely in the dark as to the cost of developing the stadium.



Q: If you didnt seek to suggest it then why mention it at all ??? You must have been thinking something along those lines to write what you did. If not then why write it ??


A: Example drawn down from my business experience and dealings with
others.



Q: If it is decided that Seat for Life is a goer then we will be told and how much it will cost us. Doesnt matter what the original price was, RM might have thought about giving them free with a packet of Rice Krispies and then changed his mind and made it Frosties and then changed it again and come up with a figure, all we need to know is the end result and no doubt he will milk it for all he thinks he can get, thats business.


A: Agree, but grass roots supporters need a voice and venue to oppose and debate any unreasonable demands of them. This is the place ?



Q: Can i respectfully suggest Ian that you phone or email Ron again and put these questions again, but at the same time phone or e-mail the Chief Executive of Sainsburys to ask them how they propose to pay for the new Superstore that will be going on the Roots Hall land as we want to be sure that they can pay for the land so that we can put it towards the new stadium.


A: No thanks, I do not do [much] business over the telephone. Prefer to keep things formal, in writing, in avoidance as to any doubt as to how the spoken word may be interpretted, or dispute as to what may or not have been stated, on both sides.

Took along too credible witnesses to the meeting with RM on 6.3.08 so do you think I am about to go commando now ?

RM has my emails and is fully aware of his reasons to not run with his stated intention to issue replies.

We just don't ourselves know what those reason may be.
 
We couldnt find 5,000 to shell out £200 for shares so unlikely you'll many willing to shell out £5000 or £7000.


That was a mere donation and has been debated at length on SZ

In this proposition, you would get something in return, for a change - a seat in perpetuity or for life - but let's see what's offered and on what conditions before jumping to any conclusions.

IMO any financial development officer worth his salary, would be able to sell 5,000 seats [or exec boxes of 10-20] at this figure even in the current climate, if the package were attractive enough.
 
I haven't got the time, or energy, to read all of the posts on this topic, but I do find peoples reactions odd at times.

It would appear that if someone dare contact the club, be it Ron or Tilly, someone on here takes great offence to that, and suggest that they should NEVER be questioned, nor should they be accountable to us - the fans.

I recently posted in another thread, merely as a side issue, that I had recently been in email conversation with Ron (he was, to be fair, very quick with his replies) and was immediately taken to task by someone who thought I was, as a mere supporter, getting ideas above my station for daring to raise a couple of concerns I had.

I can't comment on the conversation between you and Ron, nor can I speculate as to the reason why he has not come back to you, but you are 100% entitled to ask any qestions you feel you need answers to regarding your football club. As I pointed out, we are paying customers in a purely economic sense, and that entitles to question any level of service (or thereabouts) which we may not be satisfied with - and to take it a step further, if you're a shareholder, then Ron is in fact completely answerable to you.

Hope you get the answers you, and no doubt we, all want.


Green rep for you Richard Cadette.

A very welcome voice of reason, amongst the numerous complainers, who think I or grass roots supporters should not dare to question the management of our club.

I feel resigned to RM not being prepared to comment, unless shareholders table advance question for the agenda at the next AGM, so have effectively given over the task for shareholders to consider if they may themsleves want any replies to any of these [or other] questons.
 
A very welcome voice of reason, amongst the numerous complainers, who think I or grass roots supporters should not dare to question the management of our club.

Good grief Ian, are you from this planet? I've tried explaining myself several times but it seems you're incapable of understanding, so I'll put it again nice and simply for you.


I have never at any point said it's wrong to question, and I have, on numerous occasions, said I support the questions. My complaint was the repetitive nature of your posting.

I hope that clears things up a bit for you, and helps allay your mounting paranoia!
 
Good grief Ian, are you from this planet? I've tried explaining myself several times but it seems you're incapable of understanding, so I'll put it again nice and simply for you.


I have never at any point said it's wrong to question, and I have, on numerous occasions, said I support the questions. My complaint was the repetitive nature of your posting.

I hope that clears things up a bit for you, and helps allay your mounting paranoia!


On the point of paranoia, I was not referring to you - your eyes are your best asset so may I [with respect] suggest you might look through the whole thread and you may will gain a better appreciation/perspective.

So yes I believe I am from this world and that in general I am a realist.

As far as I can see you have asked multiple questions, all of which I have taken some trouble to answer - despite some/many have been answered on other ocasions, hence others are perhaps justifiably getting fed up with going over ground that has been covered.

I took the view you may not have seen the prior threads & replies, so I have extended you the courtesy of detailed responses, as I quite like your style of questioning, & having been given the right of reply.

Just a pity that our Chairman does not take the same view eh ?
 
McScriven is just about omnipresent on SZ & RM himself is a possible member in cognito. RM is aware of the discontent amongst the natives.

Excuse me but............ WHAT THE ****????????????????????????
 
To be totally honest im just getting sick and tired of reading posts back to back of the meeting you had with ron in march this year

you just seem to keep repeating the questions in different formats and its
getting booring

why dont you just call RM on monday arrange another meeting and maybe
you might just get the answers to your questions
 
To be totally honest im just getting sick and tired of reading posts back to back of the meeting you had with ron in march this year

you just seem to keep repeating the questions in different formats and its
getting booring

why dont you just call RM on monday arrange another meeting and maybe
you might just get the answers to your questions


Are you having a laugh. I have only provided answers to others questions here on this thread and why you no whisten cookie boy:-

"I feel resigned to RM not being prepared to comment, unless shareholders table advance question for the agenda at the next AGM, so have effectively given over the task for shareholders to consider if they may themsleves want any replies to any of these [or other] questons".
 
Are you having a laugh. I have only provided answers to others questions here on this thread and why you no whisten cookie boy:-

"I feel resigned to RM not being prepared to comment, unless shareholders table advance question for the agenda at the next AGM, so have effectively given over the task for shareholders to consider if they may themsleves want any replies to any of these [or other] questons".

When i last looked this a Message Board for Shrimperzone and one can write
how they feel at the time and comment in any way they they like and i just
just adding my comments to the board

and dont call me Cookie Boy
 
When i last looked this a Message Board for Shrimperzone and one can write
how they feel at the time and comment in any way they they like and i just
just adding my comments to the board

and dont call me Cookie Boy


Well you are welcome to write what you like, and so will I.

Maybe engage the grey cells before hitting the keyboaord would help and take a look at the thread before making nonsence comment.
 
Last edited:
Yes well this is even becoming slightly tiresome to me in the "Chit Chat" thread, although I do agree Ian has some very valid questions that we would all like answering.

Therefore I have changed the title of the FF forum to include "and the future of SUFC" I hope this helps.

This thread is now moved.

No offence Harry mate.:)
 
When i last looked this a Message Board for Shrimperzone and one can write
how they feel at the time and comment in any way they they like and i just
just adding my comments to the board

and dont call me Cookie Boy

I think he is referring to your avatar and username though it should have been Donut boy not cookie. DOH!!! :)
 
Well you are welcome to write what you like, and so will I.

Maybe engage the grey cells before hitting the keyboaord would help and take a look at the thread before making nonsence comment.

just took offence at being called cookie boy
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top